Skip to comments.
Brit Hume: Special Report [Excellent Analysis of 2004 Elections]
FoxNews ^
| 1-01-04
| FoxNews
Posted on 01/01/2004 4:22:27 PM PST by Salvation
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:38:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; democrats; elections; governors; house; president; republicans; senate; south
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-151 last
To: Salvation
"Barone said the Republicans would probably lose Oklahoma."
Why would he have said that? I don't understand why they would make a prediction like that about one of the South's most Republican states (at the federal level, at least). Brad Carson isn't a god. Personally, I think the GOP will hold this one ... does anybody have a good reason why they won't?
To: nutmeg
ping
142
posted on
01/02/2004 5:35:41 AM PST
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: BroncosFan
Richardson has had at least 1 affair, and I don't think Dean wants to deal with those issues like Clinton did.
143
posted on
01/02/2004 9:31:01 AM PST
by
Pubbie
(* Bill Owens 2008 *)
To: No Dems 2004
I don't understand why they would make a prediction like that about one of the South's most Republican states (at the federal level, at least). Brad Carson isn't a god. Personally, I think the GOP will hold this one ... does anybody have a good reason why they won't?
The only reason I've heard is that Carson could turn it into a rural vs. city contest with Carson uniting all the rural folk behind him. However, Carson loses if the "liberal" label is stuck to him, which Kirk Humphreys is already getting started on doing. The OK GOP saw what happened with Largent and seem determined not to make the same mistakes twice.
144
posted on
01/02/2004 4:50:38 PM PST
by
Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
(Why is Hillary a good cure for constipation? She scares the crap out of people.)
To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
"The only reason I've heard is that Carson could turn it into a rural vs. city contest with Carson uniting all the rural folk behind him. However, Carson loses if the "liberal" label is stuck to him, which Kirk Humphreys is already getting started on doing. The OK GOP saw what happened with Largent and seem determined not to make the same mistakes twice."
Don't forget that Largent and Henry were locked in a dead heat, with Henry winning by a few votes. There is no Democratic 'comeback' here. Kirk Humphreys is a Republican and will no doubt stand for conservative ideals - Carson isn't even very conservative as a Democrat, from what I hear.
To: No Dems 2004
Alos, Largent had a third party candidate sucking a tremendous amount of votes from him, and he still only narrowly lost.
About Carson, we know he's not that conservative, but it'll be up to Humphreys to define him that way to the voters who don't follow politicians like we do. One too many a Democrat has fooled the electorate into thinking they're "middle of the road centrists" (Case in point: Senator Mary Landrieu). Humphreys looks like he could expose Carson good.
146
posted on
01/03/2004 6:47:27 PM PST
by
Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
(Why is Hillary a good cure for constipation? She scares the crap out of people.)
To: TruthNtegrity; Salvation
Let's all be honest here...
We just like watchin' Brit bring on the pain!
= P
147
posted on
01/06/2004 3:14:11 PM PST
by
Mr. Thorne
("But iron, cold iron, shall be master of them all..." Kipling)
To: Mr. Thorne
Brit is better when he's on the panel answering as a guest and not a host.
148
posted on
01/06/2004 3:17:40 PM PST
by
OXENinFLA
("Freedom is God's gift to every man and woman who lives in this world." - Pres. Bush 1-5-03)
To: Mr. Thorne
But I love it anytime Brit smacks down Juan.
149
posted on
01/06/2004 3:18:50 PM PST
by
OXENinFLA
("Freedom is God's gift to every man and woman who lives in this world." - Pres. Bush 1-5-03)
To: Dont Mention the War
If that happens, it means that the Dems will be ripping themselves apart for most of the year, and that a reconciliation behind the eventual winner will be very late, causing many Dems to be still PO'ed at the winner (whoever he is) come November. McAwful made sure that the bloodletting won't be going on most of the year by moving up and compressing the primaries. It will all be over by the end of March. The only caveat is if no one can obtain enough delegates to sew up the nomination through the primaries and must depend on a brokered convention.
150
posted on
01/06/2004 3:31:48 PM PST
by
kabar
To: OXENinFLA
No doubt, no doubt...
= )
151
posted on
01/10/2004 6:14:30 PM PST
by
Mr. Thorne
("But iron, cold iron, shall be master of them all..." Kipling)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-151 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson