Posted on 01/01/2004 3:39:25 PM PST by doug from upland
FReepers, I am sorry that I am not able to provide too many details. A group I know that has been a source of news items for me in the past, has a project that may be able to stop Hillary Clinton once and for all. They do not want too much info out there for the enemy to see.
The group may need some help doing research. The reasearch must be impeccable. No mistakes can be made. The head of the group has seen the series I did of 30 articles called THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON.
The purpose of the project is to expose once and for all the real Hillary Clinton. The real Hillary Clinton is not the one that is seen in public. If people get to know the real Hillary Clinton as we know her, it will scare the hell out of all but the true believers.
With the talent on this forum, we may be able to help do the research that is needed. An example would be finding a nurse from the Georgetown University medical center who will go on record that Hillary's photo-op with sick children was totally phony. The kids in the picture were really children of staff members. The sick kids would not have been a good enough photo-op for her.
I hope we can get people to come out of the woodwork for this effort. Juanita Broaddrick has told us how Hillary grabbed her wrist and held onto her a few weeks after she was raped by Hillary's husband. We need to hear from Paul Fray, the guy who was called an Effing Jew B*stard. He passed a lie detector exam, and she has publicly denied it. We need to here from Jerome Zeifman, chief Democratic counsel during the Nixon inquiry. He did not give a referral to two of the lawyers who worked for the committee -- Bernie Nussbaum and Hillary Rodham.
I am sure that Dick Morris has lots of good stuff to share. There should be many, many others who finally want to set the record straight. If all the public learns about the real Hillary Clinton, her aspirations for national office will finally be shattered.
Please check in on this thread if you can be of help. Perhaps this could become the longest running thread ever on FreeRepublic. Thanks.
Any clues ?
(Harlem will cost Clinton more)
Barbara Olson reported, “Hillary has never repudiated her connection with the Communist movement in America or explained her relationship with two of its leading adherents. Of course, no one has pursued these questions with Hillary. She has shown she will not answer hard questions about her past, and she has learned that she does not need to-remarkable in an age when political figures are allowed such little privacy.”
Seems to me that putting our troops at risk by giving aid to the enemy (talking
down OUR SIDE) while she was in Iraq would have been enough for most
mainstream folks, Doug ...
Hillary to Troops: Support for War Fading
(Click here or on pic)
Thank you, Tom Ridge !:
And then, there was this !:WARNING. Reading the following comment may cause spewing of liquids on to keyboard and monitor. Please swallow before continuing. No animals were injured in the making of this post. Any similarity to reality is purely coincidental. Any factual statement is not the intent of the poster. Views expressed by the poster are not necessarily shared by the poster. Price is for 24 month lease with $2500 down. Your mileage may vary. Objects are closer than they appear. No shirt, no shoes, no service. You must be at least this tall to ride. Do not remove under penalty of law. Remain seated until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Reading this post may cause low birth weight. Not recommended for viewers with heart conditions, back or neck injuries, breathing difficulties, recent surgery or illness, high blood pressure and carpal tunnel syndrome.
[Disclaimer courtesy of Conspiracy Guy]
Any idea when this took place?
1997 is a long time ago in a nurse's career, especially around here. Hospitals are fighting one another for nurses, offering bonuses, novel work schedules and other perks, to get and hold onto competent nurses. I wonder if any of them would still be at Georgetown seven years after the event?
There are a couple of thought that come to mind. The first is an american motto "if at first you don't succeed, try try again".
The second thought that comes to mind is would be a variation of the joke "how do you get to carnegie hall, practice, practice, practice." That is "how do get control of congress after 40 years of democrat control?, you keep trying, trying and then succeeding".
The best thought was provided to me by Kristinn Taylor of Free Republic, dc chapter. He said that "a fanatic is someone who after failing against impossible odds, merely redoubles their effort, and I am a fanatic."
I would have to say that I volunteered for Sauerbrey's campaign for Gov. of MD in 1994 and we lost, I did it again in 1998 and we lost, I did it again for Bob Ehrlich and for the first time in 32 years in a state with a 2-1 democrat registration edge, we won.
I am a fanatic and proud to be one.
Yep. Unless she has a ranch somewhere where she plies small girls with wine, candles, soft music, internet porn, and crawls into bed with them, the media just ain't gonna bite.
2. the multiple deaths that surround the two of them (be very careful, remember the DEAD British news person who had discovered some info--think it had to do with their offshore accounts);
3. the fact that after repeated discretions she has not filed for divorce.... Spouses cannot testify against each other.
Will try to help keep thread bumped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
