Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: John Jorsett
The word got around that to fight the Americans was to die quickly. I sure hope this word gets around the whole Middle East.
To: John Jorsett
And they are mostl in their late teens or early twenties. Better than any Harard PhD., IMHO.
To: John Jorsett
I would add another very important factor: The troops were given the authority to do what was necessary to win. The President did not sit in the Oval Office selecting targets.
To: John Jorsett
The word got around that to fight the Americans was to die quickly. Nothing worked against them, and they would keep coming at you and kill you.Superior training coupled with superior weapons coupled with superior tacts destroyed the Iraqis. This old addage is proven true yet again: "The more you sweat in training, the less you bleed in battle."
5 posted on
12/29/2003 12:37:59 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: John Jorsett
Somebody "gets it" around here!
8 posted on
12/29/2003 12:41:33 PM PST by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Testimonial to the troops! We have great tech, but it takes even greater people to use it!
10 posted on
12/29/2003 12:42:21 PM PST by
TEXOKIE
(Hold fast what thou hast received!)
To: John Jorsett
I think a telling video was one I saw where an Iraqi tank was hiding a berm on three sides, leaving an escape path behind, with its gun just peeking out over the top, as the missile zeroed in on it from above (thus the pictures). They never saw what hit them.
The thing is, the Iraqi's were doing all the right things. Their mistake, however, was in fighting the tactics of the last war, while the USA was inventing the tactics of the next war.
-PJ
To: John Jorsett
The full article is a worthwhile read as well.
14 posted on
12/29/2003 12:45:31 PM PST by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: John Jorsett
They forgot to add one other reason.
Many of the Iraqi's wanted to be liberated from Saddam and refused to fight.
15 posted on
12/29/2003 12:45:42 PM PST by
Chewbacca
(I talk to myself because it is the only way I can have an intelligent conversation.)
To: John Jorsett
"Shock and Awe," it turns out, worked. Despite what "disbelievers" argued....
16 posted on
12/29/2003 12:47:16 PM PST by
Theo
To: John Jorsett
The word got around that to fight the Americans was to die quickly. Or as it is more commonly phrased:
Mess with the best; Die like the rest.
18 posted on
12/29/2003 12:53:58 PM PST by
Plutarch
To: John Jorsett
I would add to this a brilliant plan by Gen. Franks and his staff. I am convinced the Iraqi's expected another 4-6 week preparatory aerial bombardment, as in Gulf War I, which would have given them additional preparation time. Instead, Franks launched the ground attack BEFORE the air attack, judging, correctly, that with the tremendous improvements in precision guided munitions he didn't need the extra time to soften up the Iraqis. They were taken off guard, which may have explained why they hadn't produced an inventory of chemical munitions to distribute to the field commands.
19 posted on
12/29/2003 12:54:31 PM PST by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: John Jorsett
This sounds like the 23 day campaign was a success. I seem to recall at the time the media was saying weather and supply problems and fierce unexpected resistance was creating a quagmire for the good guys. Was the media reporting at variance with the facts?
20 posted on
12/29/2003 12:56:04 PM PST by
xp38
To: John Jorsett
Didn't you get sick of hearing from the media that the "ELITE" Republican Guard was going to get the best of our guys? Fat chance!
22 posted on
12/29/2003 1:08:39 PM PST by
Ditter
To: John Jorsett
Everyone please note that our next REAL opponent, the Chinese, are preparing to meet our modern tactics with satellite-killing technology, and their usual penchant for overwhelming quantities of lower-tech weapons. And they're not coming here; they'll settle for both Koreas, Taiwan, Northern Viet Nam, some of India and Siberia, and every oil field in sight.
To: John Jorsett; snippy_about_it; Darksheare; Matthew Paul; PhilDragoo; radu; bentfeather
A common reaction among the 700 embedded reporters was along the lines of, "these guys are real pros." Yes they were, and that's why Baghdad fell 23 days into the campaign.God Bless Our Troops!
26 posted on
12/29/2003 1:32:38 PM PST by
SAMWolf
(Being french means always having to say "I surrender")
To: John Jorsett; Ragtime Cowgirl; BOBTHENAILER; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Travis McGee; Squantos; ...
To our great warriors! They may just be the best!
"The word got around that to fight the Americans was to die quickly. Nothing worked against them, and they would keep coming at you and kill you."
Add that reality to the reality of the Rat Soddomite being rooted out of his root cellar and getting his medical exam on world wide tv, and the despots around Iraq understand Shock and Awe. A prime example is Krazy Kaddaffi, who ain't dumb enought to be the next guy in our cross hairs.
27 posted on
12/29/2003 1:36:05 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Kaddaffi, "I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq. ")
To: John Jorsett
To: Rose in RoseBear
ping...
43 posted on
12/29/2003 3:01:00 PM PST by
Bear_in_RoseBear
(... on the shores of the Sea comes the end of our fellowship in Middle-earth.)
To: John Jorsett
I salute our armed forces and the individual's skill and bravery.
46 posted on
12/29/2003 4:05:19 PM PST by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson