Skip to comments.
The Bush Betrayal
CATO ^
| 12/23/03
| David Boaz
Posted on 12/23/2003 11:26:47 AM PST by jimkress
In 2000 George W. Bush campaigned across the country telling voters: "My opponent trusts government. I trust you."
Little wonder that some of his supporters are now wondering which candidate won that election.
Federal spending has increased by 23.7 percent since Bush took office. Education has been further federalized in the No Child Left Behind Act. Bush pulled out all the stops to get Republicans in Congress to create the biggest new entitlement program -- prescription drug coverage under Medicare -- in 40 years.
He pushed an energy bill that my colleague Jerry Taylor described as "three parts corporate welfare and one part cynical politics . . . a smorgasbord of handouts and subsidies for virtually every energy lobby in Washington."
It's a far cry from the less-government, "leave us alone" conservatism of Ronald Reagan.
Conservatives used to believe that the U.S. Constitution set up a government of strictly limited powers.
It was supposed to protect us from foreign threats and deliver the mail, leaving other matters to the states or to the private sector -- individuals, families, churches, charities and businesses.
That's what lots of voters assumed they would get with Bush. In his first presidential debate with Al Gore, Bush contrasted his own vision of tax reduction with that of his opponent, who would "increase the size of government dramatically." Gore, Bush declared, would "empower Washington," but "my passion and my vision is to empower Americans to be able to make decisions for themselves in their own lives."
Bush was tapping into popular sentiment.
In fact, you could say that what most voters wanted in 2000 was neither Bush nor Gore but smaller government. A Los Angeles Times poll in September 2000 found that Americans preferred "smaller government with fewer services" to "larger government with many services" by 59 to 26 percent.
But that's not what voters got. Leave aside defense spending and even entitlements spending: In Bush's first three years, nondefense discretionary spending -- which fell by 13.5 percent under Ronald Reagan -- has soared by 20.8 percent. His more libertarian-minded voters are taken aback to discover that "compassionate conservatism" turned out to mean social conservatism -- a stepped-up drug war, restrictions on medical research, antigay policies, federal subsidies for marriage and religion -- and big-spending liberalism justified as "compassion."
When they're given a chance to vote, Americans don't like big government.
Last November 45 percent of the voters in the most liberal state in the Union, Ted Kennedy's Massachusetts, voted to abolish the state income tax.
In January, Oregon's liberal electorate rejected a proposed tax increase, 55 percent to 45 percent.
In September Alabama voters rejected Gov. Bob Riley's $1.2 billion tax hike by 2 to 1.
California voters tossed out big-spending Gov. Gray Davis, and 62 percent of them voted for candidates who promised not to raise taxes to close the state's deficit.
Bush and his aides should be worrying about the possibility that libertarians, economic conservatives and fed-up taxpayers won't be in his corner in 2004 in the same numbers as 2000.
Republican strategists are likely to say that libertarians and economic conservatives have nowhere else to go. Many of the disappointed will indeed sigh a deep sigh and vote for Bush as a lesser evil.
But Karl Rove, who is fascinated by the role Mark Hanna played in building the post-1896 Republican majority, should remember one aspect of that era: In the late 19th century, the Democratic Party of Jefferson, Jackson and Cleveland was known as "the party of personal liberty." More so than the Republicans, it was committed to economic and cultural laissez-faire and opposed to Prohibition, protectionism and inflation.
When the big-government populist William Jennings Bryan claimed the Democratic nomination in 1896, many assumed he would draw industrial workers from the Republicans and bring new voters to the polls. Instead, Bryan lost in a landslide, and turnout declined for the next few elections. As the more libertarian Democrats found less reason to go to the polls, the Republicans dominated national politics for the next 36 years.
It could happen that limited-government voters decide to stay home, or vote for an independent candidate in the mold of Ross Perot or Jesse Ventura or vote Libertarian.
They could even vote for an antiwar, anti-Patriot Act, socially tolerant Democrat.
Given a choice between big-government liberalism and big-government conservatism, the leave-us-alone voters might decide that voting isn't worth the trouble.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cato; constitutionparty; davidboaz; dissentnotallowed; imdbushuwillbsml8ed; keywordsprovacateur; libertarians; nodissentplease; peroutka; peroutka2004; stophillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Bush is a Big Government Liberal. The grotesque expansion of entitlements (e.g. Medicare), his 'Fuel Economy' program, the infringement of Free Speech via CFR, and the recently announced implementation of more draconian air pollution rules, are yet more examples of Bush's Liberal, Big Government agenda.
The US Constitution Party is our only hope to escape the tyranny being imposed by Democrats and Republicans.
1
posted on
12/23/2003 11:26:47 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: jimkress
Busy whining day, huh?
Hey, do you think you can find an article blaming President Bush for the Redskins' lousy season? Thanks!
2
posted on
12/23/2003 11:28:14 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: jimkress
I suppose you thing Al Gore was better?
Grow up.
3
posted on
12/23/2003 11:28:38 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(Noise proves nothing. Often the hen who merely laid an egg cackles as if she had laid an asteroid.)
To: jimkress
The US Constitution Party is our only hope Nah. The pendulum is still swinging right.
4
posted on
12/23/2003 11:30:09 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: jimkress
This is just ridiculous. Perhaps the record of Reagan needs to be revisited, also we were not at war at the time. The President campaigned on most of the things that he has done, it is just that some didn't listen and now act betrayed. I am so sick of this bashing from all sides.
5
posted on
12/23/2003 11:31:23 AM PST
by
ladyinred
(If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door!)
To: jimkress
Presidency of George W. Bush -- the first 35 months |
Banned Partial Birth Abortion Reversed Clinton's move to strike Reagan's anti-abortion Mexico Policy
Killed the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty
Killed U.S. involvement in the International Criminal Court
Killed Clinton's CO2 rules that were choking off all of the electricity surplus to California.
Killed Clinton's "ergonomic" rules that OSHA was about to implement; rules that would have shut down every home business in America.
Killed the U.S. - CCCP ABM Treaty that was preventing the U.S. from deploying our ABM defenses Has CONSTRUCTION in process on the first ten ABM silos in Alaska so that America has a defense against North Korean nukes
Pushed through THREE raises for our military.
Increased Defense Dept funding which had deteriorated during the previous 8 years Stopped foreign aid that would be used to fund abortions.
Supported and upheld the ban on abortions at military hospitals
Signed E.O. reversing Clinton's policy of not requiring parental consent for abortions under the Medical Privacy Act
Signed TWO bills into law that arm our pilots with handguns in the cockpit
Currently pushing for full immunity from lawsuits for our national gun manufacturers
Ordered Attorney-General Ashcroft to formally notify the Supreme Court that the OFFICIAL U.S. government position on the 2nd Amendment is that it supports INDIVIDUAL rights to own firearms, NOT a leftist-imagined *collective* right
Told the United Nations we weren't interested in their plans for gun control (i.e. the International Ban on Small Arms Trafficking Treaty)
Disarmed Libya of its Chemical, Nuclear, and biological WMD's without bribes or bloodshed Successfully executed 2 wars: Afghanistan and Iraq. 50 million people who had lived under tyrannical regimes now live in freedom
Executed a WAR ON TERROR by getting world-wide cooperation to track funds/terrorists (has cut off much of the terrorist's funding and captured or killed many key leaders of the al Qaeda network)
Brought back our EP-3 intel plane and crew from China without any bribes or bloodshed
Started withdrawing our troops from Bosnia and has announced withdrawal of our troops from Germany and the Korean DMZ.
Signed the LARGEST nuclear arms reduction in world history with Russia
Initiated comprehensive review of our military, which was completed just prior to 9/11/01, accurately reported that ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE was critical.
Changed the tone in the White House, restoring HONOR and DIGNITY to the Presidency
Reorganized bureaucracy...after 9/11, condensed 20+ overlapping agencies and their intelligence sectors into one agency: the Department of Homeland Security.
Initiated discussion on privatizing Social Security and individual investment accounts.
Improving govt. efficiency with .8 million jobs put up for bid...weakening unions and cutting undeserved pay raises. Wants merit based promotions/raises only.
Orchestrated Republican control of the White House, the House AND the Senate.
Killed the liberal ABA's role in vetting federal judges for Congress.
GWB signed an executive order enforcing the Supreme Court's Beck decision (re: union dues being used for political campaigns against individual's wishes)
Turned around an inherited economy that was in recession.
Passed tough new laws to hold corporate criminals to account as a result of corporate scandals.
Signed 2 income tax cuts ---- 1 of which was the largest Dollar value tax cut in world history Reduced taxes on dividends and capital gains
In process of eliminating IRS marriage penalty.
Increased small business incentives to expand and to hire new people
Signed into law the No Child Left Behind legislation delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations)
Reorganized the INS in an attempt to safeguard the borders and ports of America and to eliminate bureaucratic redundancies and lack of accountability.
Signed trade promotion authority
Committed US funds to purchase medicine for millions of men and women and children now suffering with AIDS in Africa
Passed Medicare Reform (authorized $39.5 Billion per year for preventive medicine such as drugs and doctor visits as well as included a ten year Privatization option)
Urging federal liability reform to eliminate frivolous lawsuits
Supports class action reform bill which limits lawyer fees so that more settlement money goes to victims
Submitted comprehensive Energy Plan--awaits Congressional action (works to develop cleaner technology, produce more natural gas here at home, make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy, improve national grid, etc.)
Endorses and promotes The Responsibility Era ("In a compassionate society, people respect one another and take responsibility for the decisions they make in life. My hope is to change the culture from one that has said, if it feels good, do it; if you've got a problem, blame somebody else -- to one in which every single American understands that he or she are responsible for the decisions that you make; you're responsible for loving your children with all your heart and all your soul; you're responsible for being involved with the quality of the education of your children; you're responsible for making sure the community in which you live is safe; you're responsible for loving your neighbor, just like you would like to be loved yourself. " -----this quote was too good to leave out)
Started the USA Freedom Corps
Initiated review of all federal agencies with a goal to eliminate federal jobs (completed September 2003) in an effort to reduce the size of federal gov while increasing private sector jobs.
Part of coalition (Russia, Israel, EU, Palestine, USA) for Israeli/Palestinian "Roadmap to Peace"
Challenged the United Nations to live up to their responsibilities and not become The League of Nations ( in other words, completely irrelevant)
Nominated strong, conservative judges to the judiciary.
Changed parts of the Forestry Management Act to allow necessary clean-up of the national forests in order to reduce fire danger.
As part of the national forests clean-up, the President restricted judicial challenges (based on the Endangered Species Act and other challenges) and removed the need for an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) before removing fuels/logging to reduce fire danger.
Significantly eased field-testing controls of genetically engineered crops.
President Bush signed the workplace verification bill to prevent hiring of illegal Aliens S. 1685, the Basic Pilot Extension Act of 2003, was signed by President Bush on December 3, 2003. It extends for five years the workplace employment eligibility authorization pilot programs created in 1996. It expands the pilot programs from the original five states to all 50 states.
|
6
posted on
12/23/2003 11:31:52 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: RightWhale
this should last about 4 mins before being locked or deleted
To: Capitalist Eric
I suppose you thing Al Gore was better? No Al Gore would not have been better. However, that doesn't mean that we should not criticize Bush when criticism is due. The facts speak for themselves - Bush and the current Republican majority have been expanding government, not shrinking it - not even trying.
8
posted on
12/23/2003 11:32:35 AM PST
by
Spiff
(Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: jimkress
HO HO HO!!
10
posted on
12/23/2003 11:33:27 AM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: jimkress
I am sorry, but 9/11 modified the game plan. As it is, there are very few politicians I would want as President in times like these. Fortunately, GWB is one of them.
11
posted on
12/23/2003 11:33:34 AM PST
by
CatOwner
To: jimkress
I suggest that mainline conservatives should have a problem with both CATO and Bush. CATO cannot be counted on to defend Western Civilization; I've seen them anti- or ambivalent on the War on Terror. Bush is a spendthrift protectionist, which is not what we thought we were electing.
Given a conservative foreign and domestic policy, I'd be happier, and neither CATO nor Bush is offering both.
12
posted on
12/23/2003 11:34:00 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Leave Pat Leave!)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Southack
This list would be even more impressive if the PUB-controlled Senate (and to some extent, the House) showed some real cajones.
15
posted on
12/23/2003 11:35:57 AM PST
by
CatOwner
To: Southack
I'm bookmarking your post. If the thread gets the ZOT, could ya please FReepmail me that list?
Thanks!
16
posted on
12/23/2003 11:36:07 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: ladyinred
Perhaps the record of Reagan needs to be revisited, also we were not at war at the time. How is the war an excuse for non-defense related spending increases?
17
posted on
12/23/2003 11:36:47 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: girlfromnumber4
this should last about 4 mins Yep. Merry Christmas!
18
posted on
12/23/2003 11:37:16 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: Coop
I agree with the viewpoint that Bush is a big-government type, and has liberal leanings in his policies. He hasn't vetoed a single bill in his time in office. He's indicated a willingness to renew the assault weapons ban. Steel tariffs. Medicare drug plan. Enormous boosts to education spending. In the process of negotiating another amnesty for illegals. And on and on. He's somewhat placated the conservative wing with tax cuts, pursuit of terrorists, and partial-birth abortion ban, and for that I applaud him. But the basic makeup of his political philosophy appears to be more liberal than not. It's only the fact that the Democrats have slammed the liberal needle against the far stops that makes Bush look conservative at all. That said, who am I going to vote for, one of the nine dwarves? Not a chance. I'll vote for Bush with gritted teeth, unless someone better happens along.
To: jimkress
Given a choice between big-government liberalism and big-government conservatism, the leave-us-alone voters might decide that voting isn't worth the trouble. With barbarians at the games who intend to kill millions of us I see the author is recommending the Pat Buchanan strategy to draw so-called conservative lemmings into political irrelevancy.
He might at least suggest Ralph Nader as the VP candidate to complete the Buchanan-like farce.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson