Rich Lowry (back to web version) |
SendPosted on 12/23/2003 3:22:03 AM PST by LinnieBeth
townhall.com
A fool's hope
Rich Lowry (back to web version) | Send
December 22, 2003
Lo! (Cue heraldic music here.) Out of Hollywood rises an epic of courage and hope so thunderously wonderful that it is almost enough to redeem a year's worth of pop-culture detritus, to make us forget endless reality-show hot-tub scenes, "Gigli" and even Paris Hilton as we marvel at what can be wrought by the entertainment industry when it uses its powers for good.
The occasion for such effusion is "The Return of the King," the third installment of the movie adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings." It is (with apologies to "Elf" and "Bad Santa") a perfect Christmas movie. Its themes of sacrificial love and redemption reflect Tolkien's Christianity and point to a Providence. But "The Lord of the Rings" is not a sectarian work. Some 50 million people have bought the books, and millions more will watch the movies, beguiled by the tale's artistry and its statement of human longing and purpose.
The story's outline is familiar: A great battle rages in Middle-earth over a Ring of Power. Two hobbits, Frodo and Sam, seek to destroy the ring to deny it to the Dark Lord, who fights to establish a reign of darkness throughout the land. For all the fantastic creatures -- elves, dwarves, giant spiders, etc. -- that prompt eye-rolling from cynics, the story has a ring of truth. Tolkien believed that fantasy was only a vehicle for a deeper reality, and grounded his work in what he thought were the fundamentals of our existence.
This gives "The Lord of the Rings," written in the 1950s and chronicling a time before history, a timelessness. Indeed, "The Return of the King" can seem shockingly relevant. You could be forgiven -- putting aside the anti-Bush ravings of some of its actors -- for thinking that the movie was released as pro war-on-terror propaganda. One character speaks of a "sleepless malice" rising in the East. Sounds familiar. The forces resisting the Dark Lord are arrayed in the West, and their leader's battle cry has a special post-9/11 resonance: "By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!" Hurrah!
But "The Lord of the Rings" resists easy political categories. Tolkien's work has always been rejected by the literary establishment, partly because its depiction of a battle between good and evil is supposedly too "simplistic." This is an egregious misreading. For Tolkien, evil is very real, but it is also pervasive, meaning it can tempt and corrupt anyone. Even the hobbit hero of his tale, Frodo, struggles with temptation, at times unsuccessfully.
The story's hobbits are meant to be like us, middle class and unprepossessing. At 4 feet tall or less, they seemingly stand no chance in a hostile world of wizards and monsters. But they soldier on and, in remaining true to their duty, help save the world. For all their weakness and failings, they are part of something larger that infuses their struggles with purpose. This is what we all want to believe of our own lives, and when we do, we have hope.
The word "hope" is studded throughout "The Return the King." The leader of the forces of the West is told: "The men have found their captain. They will follow him to battle. Even to death. You have given us hope." At a dark moment, a hobbit asks Gandalf, a wizard who has achieved a kind of saintliness: "Is there much hope for Frodo and Sam?" He replies, "There never was much hope, just a fool's hope." Ah, but the beauty of "The Lord of the Rings" is its message that such hope can be realized, that a beneficence beyond our understanding underpins the universe.
As the world pauses this week to celebrate a holiday marking the birth of a Savior born in a manger, it is the season for cherishing the hope of fools.
 Ring Ping!! |
Anyone wishing to be added to or removed from the Ring-Ping list, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Hmmm, that quote reminds me of somebody else who sacrificed himself for the sake of others. ;-)
You know Elrond raised Aragorn, after the death of his father...
Then Aragorn, being now the Heir of Isildur, was taken with his mother to dwell in the house of Elrond; and Elrond took the place of his father and came to love him as a son of his own. But he was called Estel, that is "Hope", and his true name and lineage were kept secret at the bidding of Elrond; for the Wise then knew that the Enemy was seeking to discover the Heir of Isildur, if any remained upon earth.
Aragorn's mother is quoted by Elrond and Aragorn in elvish during the movie...very moving, imo...
From the book:
"This is our last parting, Estel, my son. I am aged by care, even as one of lesser Men; and now that it draws near I cannot face the darkness of our time that gathers upon Middle-earth. I shall leave it soon." 'Aragorn tried to comfort her, saying: "Yet there may be a light beyond the darkness; and if so, I would have you see it and be glad." 'But she answered only with this linnod:Ónen i-Estel Edain, ú-chebin estel animand Aragorn went away heavy of heart. Gilraen died before the next spring.
It means "I gave Hope to the Dunedain, I have kept no hope for myself." I love the capitalization of the first word Hope. One of my favorite parts of the book, as I'm sure you can tell by the way I'm running on about it...but my heart just broke when Elrond started saying the Gilraen quote.
Yes, and God Bless them, the soldiers, every one.
Good essay...but to put the fine point of criticism on it, Hollywood cannot take much (or any) credit for it. It was created essentially by New Zealanders in New Zealand.
If Hollywood had had a hand in it, then it would not be the movie it is today. It would have been corrupted, and Tolkien's vision completely distorted and misinterpreted. It would have been "politically-corrected", if you will. Thank God it was made *away* from that poisonous and sick environment.
This is the socialist perversion of "Greater love has no one that this, that one lay down his life for his friends." (John 15:13).
The former says the "good of the one" has less value than the "good of the many." Consequently it can be used (and has been used) by the State to plunder the one (or the few). What motivates Frodo is love, not socialist economics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.