Posted on 12/17/2003 12:59:10 PM PST by Catspaw
Just breaking on MSNBC: John Hinckley has been granted unsupervised visits with his parents.
Granted by a member of the Clintonista Star Chamber, I might add. Filthy animals.Filthy RATS.
That did not stop her from breaking the gun laws she championed when she purchased a shot gun for her son.
She ought to have known that purchasing a gun for someone else is illegal. However, true to liberal tenets she was not charged.
ha ! I had no idea.Thank you Google Search:
What Feminist Celebrity Eugenics Teaches Us about Immigration Policy
Part 1: Jodie Foster's Baby
Feminist heroine / single mother / glamour queen Jodie Foster apparently undertook a more methodical search for the perfect sperm donor. According to numerous reports in the British press in 1998, she had proudly announced that after a long hunt, she had had herself impregnated with the gametes of a tall, dark, handsome scientist with an IQ of 160.
While Miss Foster will neither confirm nor deny these articles, this does not at all seem out of character. In her movies and personal life, Miss Foster has often appeared to be loyally trying to reproduce her unusual upbringing. According to her ne'er-do-well brother Buddy's tell-all book Foster Child, Alicia Foster's nickname of "Jodie" is a tribute to "Aunt" Jo, who was their mother's pistol-packing live-in lesbian lover. [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN /0525941436/qid%3D961272014/026-1856608-9588403 ] Jodie was a child prodigy who thrived in this environment, reading at 18 months, becoming the Coppertone Kid at three, and later on graduating summa cum laude from Yale. Thus, her first directorial effort was Little Man Tate, in which she played a single mother raising a seven-year-old genius. Similarly, her production company received multiple Emmy nominations for Baby Dance, a Showtime cable movie with Stockard Channing playing a wealthy, high-powered woman who wants a baby but can't get pregnant in the traditional manner. Not surprisingly, Jodie named her firm Egg Pictures.
I guess this is a good example of what happens when someone (SPECIFICALLY CONGRESS) doesn't do their job correctly.....
But his Justice Department had better appeal this ruling.
And in every instance they are the same.
This is the funniest, albeit black humor, post I have seen in a long time!
That is funny but it's not black humor. Now if he had said "Has anyone told him that Al Sharpton's been porking Jody Foster?" it would have been black humor
I love being politically incorrect
Mental illness or not, I disagree completely that he should get unsupervised visits....in fact, he should never be allowed out of the mental hospital/institution to which he was "sentenced." Regardless of his mental condition then or now, the man attempted to assasinate the POTUS...he should still have to pay an "ultimate" consequence for his action, and in his case, IMHO, given his mental state, should have meant that he NEVER saw the light of day outside an institution. And he and his parents should count themselves amongst the most fortunate that he never had to serve one day in a federal penitentary nor had to face the death penalty for what he did. In addition to President Reagan and Jim Brady, didn't a Secret Service officer get shot as well and later died? (don't remember this part for sure).
Suffice to say, the man caused such life altering damage to so many, that frankly he never DESERVED to see the light of day...and he's lucky to have "served" time the way he has all these years instead of in the federal penal system.
WELL SAID, brewcrew!!!! If you're well enough to go on unsupervised visits, then you're sure as hell well enough to spend the rest of your life behind bars in a federal prison!!!!! This is such a mockery of justice!...bought and paid for by the Hinchleys themselves and their liberal weenie co-enablers. It never ceases to amaze me to see what you can get away with if you have enough money and know to whom to dole it out....(a sad, sad day for America, for our system of jurisprudence....and a slap in the face to ALL who have had to endure unspeakable pain and suffering at the hands of the mentally-disturbed. This is not to say that I don't have compassion for the mentally-disturbed, because I do...However as a society, we should never, EVER allow a single innocent life to be put at risk.
She ought to have known that purchasing a gun for someone else is illegal. However, true to liberal tenets she was not charged.
It was a rifle, suitable for sniping, IIRC. However she did not break the law. Buying a gun as a bona fide gift is legal, as long as the person you give it to is not prohibited person. There are details, but in general that's the deal.
If you buy the gun with someone elses money, that's a straw purchase, and illegal. If you buy it with the intent to sell it to them, that too is probably illegal (dealing without a license) and certainly is if they are a prohibited person. AFAIK her son is/was not a prohibited person. She *should* be, but isn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.