Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Hinckley Granted Unsupervised Visits
MSNBC ^ | 12/17/2003 | MSNBC

Posted on 12/17/2003 12:59:10 PM PST by Catspaw

Just breaking on MSNBC: John Hinckley has been granted unsupervised visits with his parents.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hinckley; johnhinckley; nuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: Viking2002
Granted by a member of the Clintonista Star Chamber, I might add. Filthy animals.
Filthy RATS.
141 posted on 12/18/2003 3:23:19 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: veronica
One who doesn't like Republicans, either.

Blown call - hope there's an appeal.
142 posted on 12/18/2003 5:43:34 AM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
She used the opportunity of her husband's horrific injuries to exploit the gun issue for personal gain. Earning huge sums of money from the various gun grapping organizations she 'founded'.

That did not stop her from breaking the gun laws she championed when she purchased a shot gun for her son.

She ought to have known that purchasing a gun for someone else is illegal. However, true to liberal tenets she was not charged.

143 posted on 12/18/2003 6:07:55 AM PST by OldFriend ( BLESS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I don't recall seeing a first name mentioned in post 9.
144 posted on 12/18/2003 6:26:02 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: contessa machiaveli
No
145 posted on 12/18/2003 6:28:33 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder; billorites; potlatch; nopardons; ntnychik
ha ! I had no idea.

Thank you Google Search:

What Feminist Celebrity Eugenics Teaches Us about Immigration Policy
Part 1: Jodie Foster's Baby


Jodie Foster

Feminist heroine / single mother / glamour queen Jodie Jodie Foster in Silence of the LambsFoster apparently undertook a more methodical search for the perfect sperm donor. According to numerous reports in the British press in 1998, she had proudly announced that after a long hunt, she had had herself impregnated with the gametes of a tall, dark, handsome scientist with an IQ of 160.

While Miss Foster will neither confirm nor deny these articles, this does not at all seem out of character. In her movies and personal life, Miss Foster has often appeared to be loyally trying to reproduce her unusual upbringing. According to her ne'er-do-well brother Buddy's tell-all book Foster Child, Alicia Foster's nickname of "Jodie" is a tribute to "Aunt" Jo, who was their mother's pistol-packing live-in lesbian lover. [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN /0525941436/qid%3D961272014/026-1856608-9588403 ] Jodie was a child prodigy who thrived in this environment, reading at 18 months, becoming the Coppertone Kid at three, and later on graduating summa cum laude from Yale. Thus, her first directorial effort was Little Man Tate, in which she played a single mother raising a seven-year-old genius. Similarly, her production company received multiple Emmy nominations for Baby Dance, a Showtime cable movie with Stockard Channing playing a wealthy, high-powered woman who wants a baby but can't get pregnant in the traditional manner. Not surprisingly, Jodie named her firm Egg Pictures.

Click here for entire article


146 posted on 12/18/2003 6:42:14 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Hillary is a TRAITOR !!: http://Richard.Meek.home.comcast.net/HitlerTraitor6.JPG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Well, I heard from Joe DiGenniva (sp) on IMUS this am that the judge had no choice but to do this (so I guess I can't blame it on a clinton appointee). It apparently has to do with the way the Congress wrote the law regarding these nut cases and how they are handled....

I guess this is a good example of what happens when someone (SPECIFICALLY CONGRESS) doesn't do their job correctly.....

147 posted on 12/18/2003 6:47:08 AM PST by b4its2late (I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Their logic bypasses me. Why would Pres. Bush want to release a man who attempted the assassination of a former president--one who is often compared to the present president?
148 posted on 12/18/2003 6:54:44 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Bush has nothing to do with the court ruling.

But his Justice Department had better appeal this ruling.

149 posted on 12/18/2003 7:20:27 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: international american
There are liberals and there are Reagan haters.

And in every instance they are the same.

150 posted on 12/18/2003 7:43:49 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Has anyone told him that Clinton's been porking Jody Foster?

This is the funniest, albeit black humor, post I have seen in a long time!

That is funny but it's not black humor. Now if he had said "Has anyone told him that Al Sharpton's been porking Jody Foster?" it would have been black humor

I love being politically incorrect

151 posted on 12/18/2003 7:46:31 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Oh, I agree. The idiocy of these people astound me.
152 posted on 12/18/2003 8:00:42 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: twigs
*Their* logic is that Bush-I was VP and would have become President had Hinckley killed Regan.

Sick minds.
153 posted on 12/18/2003 8:06:36 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
If in fact he was truly suffering from a mental illness when he shot the President, and if in fact he has been largely treated, then good for him if he gets unsupervised vists.

Mental illness or not, I disagree completely that he should get unsupervised visits....in fact, he should never be allowed out of the mental hospital/institution to which he was "sentenced." Regardless of his mental condition then or now, the man attempted to assasinate the POTUS...he should still have to pay an "ultimate" consequence for his action, and in his case, IMHO, given his mental state, should have meant that he NEVER saw the light of day outside an institution. And he and his parents should count themselves amongst the most fortunate that he never had to serve one day in a federal penitentary nor had to face the death penalty for what he did. In addition to President Reagan and Jim Brady, didn't a Secret Service officer get shot as well and later died? (don't remember this part for sure).

Suffice to say, the man caused such life altering damage to so many, that frankly he never DESERVED to see the light of day...and he's lucky to have "served" time the way he has all these years instead of in the federal penal system.

154 posted on 12/18/2003 8:19:48 AM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew
In other words, once you're well, you go to the big house, NOT GO ON UNSUPERVISED FIELD TRIPS TO MOMMY'S HOUSE!

WELL SAID, brewcrew!!!! If you're well enough to go on unsupervised visits, then you're sure as hell well enough to spend the rest of your life behind bars in a federal prison!!!!! This is such a mockery of justice!...bought and paid for by the Hinchleys themselves and their liberal weenie co-enablers. It never ceases to amaze me to see what you can get away with if you have enough money and know to whom to dole it out....(a sad, sad day for America, for our system of jurisprudence....and a slap in the face to ALL who have had to endure unspeakable pain and suffering at the hands of the mentally-disturbed. This is not to say that I don't have compassion for the mentally-disturbed, because I do...However as a society, we should never, EVER allow a single innocent life to be put at risk.

155 posted on 12/18/2003 8:39:57 AM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
That did not stop her from breaking the gun laws she championed when she purchased a shot gun for her son.

She ought to have known that purchasing a gun for someone else is illegal. However, true to liberal tenets she was not charged.

It was a rifle, suitable for sniping, IIRC. However she did not break the law. Buying a gun as a bona fide gift is legal, as long as the person you give it to is not prohibited person. There are details, but in general that's the deal.

If you buy the gun with someone elses money, that's a straw purchase, and illegal. If you buy it with the intent to sell it to them, that too is probably illegal (dealing without a license) and certainly is if they are a prohibited person. AFAIK her son is/was not a prohibited person. She *should* be, but isn't.

156 posted on 12/18/2003 11:39:38 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Thanks for the info........I remember reading it differently, but cannot attest to the truth of anything printed in the media.
157 posted on 12/18/2003 11:44:23 AM PST by OldFriend ( BLESS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Well, I wouldn't necessary believe me either. Check it out on BATFE or NRA websites. Might save your kittens or puppies.
158 posted on 12/18/2003 11:51:55 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: international american
if he safe unsupervised in the outside world - it doesn't hold that he should be supervised when he's locked in at the institution... the Judge needs to be drug-tested -
159 posted on 12/18/2003 11:54:11 AM PST by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
"if he safe unsupervised in the outside world - it doesn't hold that he should be supervised when he's locked in at the institution... the Judge needs to be drug-tested "

Just evil,pure and simple!!
160 posted on 12/18/2003 12:03:43 PM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson