Posted on 12/15/2003 7:19:27 PM PST by Senator Pardek
CAIRO, December 15 (IslamOnline.net) Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsy Clarke expressed readiness Sunday, December 14, to act as defense lawyer for ousted Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, with western analysts suspecting the captured leader would be given fair trial.
"Certainly, why not. I am ready to act in his defense," Clarke told IslamOnline.net shortly after the U.S. confirmed the detention of Saddam near Tikrit.
Clarke, currently in Cairo to attend a two-day international anti-occupation conference, stressed that Saddam however brutal should be give a "fair, objective and impartial trial".
"Saddam must be domestically prosecuted first and - if this fails - he should be referred to an international court," said the former American official, known for his staunch opposition to the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.
He doubted, however, that the ousted Iraqi president would be given such a fair trial.
Clarke averred that neither the U.S.-installed Interim Governing Council (IGC) nor the occupation forces is eligible to try the overthrown president.
"The IGC does not represent Iraq. It is Bush's council," said the former U.S. attorney general.
He noted that the Iraqi body was quick to say that DNA test proved the captured man was Saddam.
"Do you think that they can take the test themselves. They are puppets," Clarke maintained.
For the occupation forces to take over the trial, he dismissed this as a would-be ridiculous proposal.
"Occupation of Iraq is in itself an international crime" and runs counter to common decency and moral integrity.
Asked if Saddam could be taken to the International Criminal Court, the former U.S. attorney general whimsically ruled out the suggestion, noting Washington does not even recognize the court.
I had given the edge to Geoffrey Feiger over Mark Geragos, but I wasn't thinking high enough on the sphincter list to think of Ramsey. Damn. Can't believe this t**d is still around.
Slightly off-topic, but did I ever mention what I saw with my own eyes, bringing up the rear of the last ANSWER rally in DC?
Red Cross vans full of disabled commies who wouldn't have been able to "march" otherwise.
People ought to be really careful about donating their money. If the Red Cross ever wants one dime of mine, they will literally have to shoot me for it.
But half the world does not know of Saddam's crimes, thanks to the lack of seriousness in the "profession" of journalism. People need to remember.
Oh, sorry about that. Well, you and Michael Jackson have something in common then.
I love my Protestant brothers. Answer me this, in all due respect, if the Holy Spirit guides all who read the Bible sincerely, why are there so many interpretations and disagreements on the same text
Other than that, even within the Catholic teachings - the Pope is wrong on this.
I've said twice the Pope is wrong on this as it contradicts 2,000 of handed down tradition and Scripture. Which is probably why he only said it as his personal opinion.
I know that, but Clark, insufferable as he is, is not guilty of treason, he's simply exercising his right as an American citizen to free political speech.
I do not agree with any part of it, but I do recognize his right to voice his opinions.
I don't think that he'll get to do it anyway, most likely, Saddam will get an Iraqi lawyer.
"Let him defend Saddam. Let him try. Let him stand up and defend a man that is known to have killed over a half-million people in thirty years, not counting the Iran-Iraq and Kuwait wars. Let the world know that Ramsey Clark is a man that would try to let Saddam Hussein walk scot-free. He'll be so politically radioactive, only the fringe of the fringe will touch him after that."
Gotcha. See how easy it is to misinterpret. I just did :-)
Though I don't agree with the Pope on this issue
I also don't expect the Pope to say .. Kill the SOB
Kristinn handed Clark a David Horowitz pamphlet on the Communist origin of the current "peace movement" per quotes from his post below. (Click here for that post)
I politely stepped forward and asked Mr. Clark if he would take the pamphlet. He extended his hand and took it from me. He walked in the lunchroom followed by Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, A.N.S.W.E.R.'s Commie lawyer.
I offered Ms. Verheyden-Hilliard a pamphlet, saying that as a lawyer she could check it out for libel and slander. She ignored me.
Next was Brian Becker, a member of the secretariat of the Workers World Party and spokesman for A.N.S.W.E.R. I didn't speak to him and he didn't speak to me.
My sign at the FReep, based on a suggestion of Sauropod, was:
IMPEACH RAMSEY CLARK ANTI-U.S. TRAITOR
Related thread: Ramsey Clark Now Alleges US Threatens 'Destiny of Humanity' (FR DC Chapter Protest mentioned)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.