Posted on 12/15/2003 3:06:24 PM PST by jmcclain19
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3718010/
WASHINGTON - In a major foreign policy address Monday, Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean hailed the capture of Saddam Hussein as “good news for the Iraqi people and for the world,” but also claimed that his capture “could have taken place six months ago.”
Dean foreign policy adviser Susan Rice said after the speech that the former Vermont governor meant that if the Bush administration had done thorough planning for the aftermath of the military conflict, it could have developed better intelligence sources and in turn might have more quickly captured the deposed Iraqi dictator.
“The capture of Saddam has not made America safer,” Dean also said in the speech.
Lieberman: Dean in 'his own spider hole' That remark drew a caustic reply from one of Dean’s rivals for the Democratic nomination, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman.
“Howard Dean has climbed into his own spider hole of denial if he believes that the capture of Saddam Hussein has not made America safer,” Lieberman said. “Saddam Hussein is a homicidal maniac, brutal dictator, supporter of terrorism, and enemy of the United States, and there should be no doubt that America and the world are safer with him captured.”
In a question-and-answer period following the speech, Dean also said, “I have never found the evidence convincing that Iraq was ever a significant threat to the United States.”
Dean’s candidacy has been powered by his attack on what he calls “the president’s unilateral intervention in Iraq.”
The Bush administration disputes the characterization of the removal of Saddam as “unilateral.” Several other nations, most significantly Great Britain, have contributed troops to the Iraq operation and have suffered casualties.
Dean said in Monday’s speech to the Pacific Council in Los Angeles that Bush had “launched the wrong war, at the wrong time, with inadequate planning, insufficient help and at extraordinary cost.”
'Rallying cry for terrorist recruits' The Iraq war, he alleged, “diverted critical intelligence and military resources … and created a new rallying cry for terrorist recruits.”
Dean said he “would not have hesitated” to launch an attack on Iraq “had the United Nations given us permission and asked us to be part of a multilateral force.”
And he emphasized that he would support use of American military force in some cases, noting that he did support the rollback of Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1991 and the effort to halt ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Kosovo.
He also said that in Iraq he would have supported U.S. intervention to halt Saddam’s massacres of Shiites in 1991.
Dean, who many polls show is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, also charged that Bush “is about to be responsible for the fact that North Korea has become a nuclear power.” He said, “There is no disgrace in having the most powerful nation on earth negotiate bilaterally with North Korea, while we also pursue a multilateral track.”
Dean assailed “the hard-liners in the Bush administration” for spurning the possibility of engaging in bilateral negotiations with the regime of Kim Jong Il.
In the speech, Dean blasted what he called Bush’s “go-it-alone approach to every problem,” as well as what he said was its “radical unilateralism” and “brash boastfulness.”
“We find ourselves, too often, isolated and resented,” he declared, charging that Bush administration officials “seem to believe that nothing can be gained from working with nations that have stood by our side as allies for generations.”
He pledged to expand the existing U.S. program to find and control the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons inventory of the former Soviet Union.
Fire from Lieberman, Kucinich Of Dean’s eight rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, his most severe critics have been Lieberman and Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
Lieberman told reporters Sunday, “the capture of Saddam Hussein makes clear the choice between Howard Dean and me, which is the clearest choice that the candidates for president in the Democratic Party present.”
Lieberman said, “If Howard Dean has his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison.”
Kucinich meanwhile has criticized Dean for offering no timeline for withdrawal of American soldiers from Iraq and for not being willing to cut the Defense Department budget – which Kucinich proposes to cut by $60 billion or about 15 percent of current outlays.
“No one else is saying definitively that we must end the (Iraq) occupation and I’m the only one doing it,” Kucinich told MSNBC.com recently. “I see this as a defining issue in this election. We must have a plan to get out. Not maybe. … We must have the Democrats united in ending the occupation.”
Dean assailed “the hard-liners in the Bush administration” for spurning the possibility of engaging in bilateral negotiations with the regime of Kim Jong Il.
In the speech, Dean blasted what he called Bush’s “go-it-alone approach to every problem,” as well as what he said was its “radical unilateralism” and “brash boastfulness.”
1. Dean supports "go it alone" with North Korea, not multi-lateral as Bush supports...then criticizes Bush for "going it alone."
2. 50-50 Kim Jong-Il's position was must made stronger. He may wait out until the election to see if Dean is elected...and he can get the same deal he got from Clinton, and cheat on it again.
Dean fits this definition.
His cocky arrogance and haughty body language displays a perfect comination of Hitler and Mussolini.......just look at the historical films of that time.........it's creepy!!
Dean is shooting himself in the foot bigtime.
Surely, voting for Howard Dean is a very risky scheme, indeed!
On the record, no less!
yet today .....Dean states Saddam isn't a threat. Dean is shooting himself in the foot bigtime.
Well, let's hope Dubya gives him some more bullets in the next 10 months. ;^)
Don't let anyone tell you there isn't a liberal filter on the big media. Just give the above example.
Dean: “I never said Saddam was a danger to the United States. Ever.”
Mara Liasson: “In fact in September of 2002, Dean said exactly that. On the CBS program Face The Nation, Dean said “there is no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States.” [NPR, 12/11/2003]
OUCH!!!
OMG give me a break. Since when is Dean a field spook?
Yeah, right! Dean has absolutely no basis to make such a claim. His foreign policy advisor, one Susan Rice said better planning and intelligence, "might have more quickly captured the deposed Iraqi dictator".
Might have! LOL
Susan Rice is NO Condy Rice
and
Howie Dean is NO George W.Bush.
Then comes a whopper from Dean: " “The capture of Saddam has not made America safer,”
Dean simply can not be taken seriously. With statements like these, he continually damages his credibility. Dean is a flake.
Interesting. Rice worked for the Clinton admin as a diplomat for Africa when Monsoor Ijaz was negotiating Osama's release to US custody. To this day she denies there is anything to the story even though Clinton himself has admitted it.
He's a doctor, not a leader.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.