Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Changing One Gene Launches New Fly Species
Science Daily ^ | 08 December 2003 | Staff

Posted on 12/09/2003 7:47:21 AM PST by PatrickHenry

In what has been described as the "perfect experiment," evolutionary biologists at the University of Chicago replaced a single gene in fruit flies and discovered a mechanism by which two different "races" begin to become different species, with one group adapted to life in the tropics and the other suited to cooler climates. The tropical group was more tolerant of starvation but less tolerant of cold. The temperate group was less able to resist starvation but better adapted to cool weather.

The altered gene also changed the flies' pheromones, chemical signals that influence mating behavior. As a result, the researchers show in the Dec. 5 issue of Science, the two groups of flies are not only fit for different environments but may also be on their way to sexual isolation, a crucial divide in the emergence of a new species.

"This study directly connects genetics with evolution," said Chung-I Wu, Ph.D., professor and chairman of ecology and evolution at the University of Chicago and director of the study. For the first time, we were able to demonstrate the vast importance in an evolutionary context of a small genetic change that has already occurred in nature."

"We had the luxury," added co-author Tony Greenberg, Ph.D., a postdoctoral student in Wu's laboratory, "of watching the essential event in Darwinian evolution, the first step in the origin of a new species. We were quite impressed, that this simple alteration played such a dramatic role, both adapting flies to a new environment and changing their sex appeal. Once two groups become sexually isolated, there's no turning back."

The scientists used a new technique to knock out one gene from fruit flies and then replace it with one of two slightly different versions of the same gene.

They focused on a gene called desaturase2 that plays a role in fat metabolism. Flies from Africa and the Caribbean, where there is tremendous competition for food but cold temperatures are not a problem, have one version of ds2. Flies from cooler climates, where there is less competition for food but greater temperature variation, have a smaller, inactive version of ds2.

The same gene plays a role in the production of cuticular hydrocarbons -- waxy, aromatic compounds that coat the abdomen of female flies. A male fly, in a romantic mood, strokes the female's abdomen with his feet, which have sensors that recognize specific hydrocarbons, like a perfume.

In a previous report, Wu's laboratory found most males with the temperate version of the ds2 gene preferred females with the same gene; tropical males preferred tropical females.

"Developing increased cold tolerance was an important step for flies that migrated out of Africa to Europe and Asia," Wu said. The change in pheromones, which altered patterns of sexual attraction, "was a by-product of adaptation to colder weather."

Fruit flies have a migratory history similar to humans. They originated in Africa, spread to Europe and Asia and went on to populate the world. As with humans, there is greater diversity within African flies than between flies from Africa and other continents.

Although fruit flies have been a favorite model for the study of genetics since the early 20th century, recognition of consistent differences between tropical and temperate flies came only in 1995. The discovery, however, "has allowed a lot of analysis of the evolution of adaptive traits," Wu said.

"But this was the first time we have been able to study the process from the very beginning," he added, "to watch the first steps as one species begins to split into two, then seals the bargain by increasing sexual isolation. This is the essence of biodiversity."

Additional authors include Jennifer Moran from the Wu lab and Jerry Coyne of the University of Chicago. The National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation funded the study.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution; genetics; speciation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-270 next last
To: balrog666
Hey! I loved you in the Lord of the Rings. Great job! ;)
161 posted on 12/11/2003 9:12:48 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"As to the issue of genes, I don't believe you're serious."

Well, that's OK. I'm not selling anything here.

For what it is worth; I have, honestly, never encountered anyone that denies the existance of genes.

You say they are everywhere, but; either cannot, or will not tell me where I can find even one. Please provide any supporting, or confirming evidence of gene denial.

"I don't spend a lot of time trying to convince anyone what they should believe."

You have spent a fair amount of time, right here, trying to convince others what not to believe. To what end do you weaken another man's faith?

162 posted on 12/11/2003 9:40:20 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"That this isn't obvious to you convinces me that you're not seriously interested."

Because I request supporting evidence, you don't think I'm serious.

163 posted on 12/11/2003 9:59:03 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
Do you wish to have control over what I tell my children?

Are you channeling Junior?


"Think about it Christians, is what I wrote: how do YOU get 'controlling' from that?
164 posted on 12/11/2003 12:15:51 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
I'm starting to think you're Sun Tzu.

I made a comment earlier in the thread and you jumped on me. I have no interest in converting you to Christianity.

As for my original comment, do you agree with the poster in post #105 that "kinds" are clones or not?
165 posted on 12/11/2003 12:16:58 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
To what end do you weaken another man's faith?
 

Ephesians 6:4
   Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord.
 
1 Timothy 1:3
   As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain men not to teach false doctrines any longer....
 
1 Timothy 6:3-4
 3.  If anyone teaches false doctrines and does not agree to the sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ and to godly teaching,
 4.  he is conceited and understands nothing.
 
Titus 2:1
   You must teach what is in accord with sound doctrine.

166 posted on 12/11/2003 12:30:14 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
...you're the first person ...

Now there are two.............

167 posted on 12/11/2003 12:31:13 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
...I don't seem to be able to get a response ...

Sometimes folks actually are doing something OTHER than sitting in front of their terminal..

;^)

168 posted on 12/11/2003 12:32:58 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Are you channeling Junior?

Now you're just being mean. ;)

And now there are 2.

169 posted on 12/11/2003 12:36:34 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
To what end do you weaken another man's faith?
 
HMmmm................
 
Paul seemed to think that it was posswible:
 
 Romans 14:1
 
 1.  Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters.
.
.
.
 13.  Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in your brother's way.
 14.  As one who is in the Lord Jesus, I am fully convinced that no food  is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for him it is unclean.
 15.  If your brother is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy your brother for whom Christ died.
.
.
.
 20.  Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble.
 21.  It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.

170 posted on 12/11/2003 12:37:38 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Great... Just what we need in this world: More flies.
171 posted on 12/11/2003 12:40:04 PM PST by Redcloak (°¿°)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
..."how do YOU get 'controlling'(what I tell my children) from that?"

From the quote I provided with that statement. Here it is again:

"Think about it Christians, as you lie to your young children this season, just so you can see the 'look on their little faces'"

But, we digress....

If others choose to believe the sky is green, what difference does it make to you?

Do you wish to prevent me from telling lies to my children?

To what end do weaken another man's faith?

172 posted on 12/11/2003 12:54:23 PM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"Are you channeling Junior?"

I'm sorry, I don't know a 'Junior'.

173 posted on 12/11/2003 12:58:57 PM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
re: 3. It hasn't speciated yet! )))

Well, has it?

174 posted on 12/11/2003 1:01:56 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
...MAY also be on their way to sexual isolation, a crucial divide in the emergence of a new species.

...two different "races" BEGIN to become different species, Emphasis mine. Did you notice these qualifiers?

Maybe these scientists should take these qualifiers out, if they are claiming speciation?

Also, how can this be a "perfect" experiment of evolution, if a supremely unnatural process is part of this experiment?

After all, in nature, you don't have some creative scientist tinkering with the original organism's software--

Now, do we?

175 posted on 12/11/2003 1:09:34 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"I made a comment earlier in the thread and you jumped on me."

Sir, I have never jumped on you. Never. I have been abundantly civil, with a sincere curiosity.

Please disregard my prior queries, and let's just leave it at that.

176 posted on 12/11/2003 1:25:12 PM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"Paul seemed to think that it was posswible:"

Please tell me if I am understanding you correctly, and; I mean no inference or criticism...I just wish to understand.

Are you saying that, for evangelical reasons, it is appropriate to weaken another man's faith?

177 posted on 12/11/2003 1:31:50 PM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
I apologize if I offended you.

Maybe we'll bump into each other on another thread when I'm not so crabby. ;)
178 posted on 12/11/2003 2:16:26 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle; <1/1,000,000th%; Elsie; PatrickHenry; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; laotzu; ...
re: 3. It hasn't speciated yet! )))

Well, has it?

If the Confederate Stated of America had won the war, the people of the USA may have been repulsed and decided not to marry anyone from the South and vice versa.

Would that make them separate species? ;-)

(Thought I'd let you know I'm still seeing it fit to survive, myself.)

My decimaled FRiend: no human-to-mollusk mutations, please.

179 posted on 12/11/2003 2:26:15 PM PST by unspun ("Do everything in love." | No I don't look anything like her but I do like to hear "Unspun w/ AnnaZ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
The morality that is taught in Christianity is a good thing. It's basically the laws that we learned when we first started being a social animal. Unfortunately, Christianity has brain-washed people into believing that morality originated WITH the Bible. If people become disillusioned by the "God" part of the Bible, they also often drop the morality part as well; causing the breakdown in sociaty that we are seeing today. Christianity taught morality for many years and there is no one to teach it now, now that the Church no longer has total control over people's lives like it used to have.
180 posted on 12/11/2003 3:29:04 PM PST by Merdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson