Skip to comments.
Janklow Guilty
NBC news
| Diverdogz
Posted on 12/08/2003 3:53:45 PM PST by Diverdogz
Just saw on the news, Janklow Guilty on all counts....
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: janklow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 last
To: Steve_Seattle
Looks like Wild Bill is holding a can of Wild Cherry Pepsi
To: WackyKat
The whole Diabetes Defense was bogus and was manufactured long after the accident when charges were filed I know that, I knew that was a very weak lie when I first heard it.
This (my post #145): This supreme jerk knows how serious his condition is. If he did not eat all day then not only was he jeopardizing himself, he was putting the lives of others in jeopardy. And the result is, he's guilty. was my reply to freeper HapaxLegamenon post #73 (I think) where he/she posted something about beyond a reasonable doubt.
I never for one minute bought the Janklow had not eaten in 18 hours defense.
162
posted on
12/08/2003 8:22:39 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: Rodney King
"Bill Janklow speeds when he drives shouldn't, but he does," Janklow said then. "When he gets the ticket he pays it..."southernnorthcarolina finds people who speak in the third person very annoying.
To: TexKat
I never for one minute bought the Janklow had not eaten in 18 hours defense. I thought that was probably the weakest defense he could use, when it's on record he had 3 or 4 prior speeding violations in South Dakota, and the latest one involved a fatality.
Either 1. he thought he was above the law, 2. the law enforcement in SD was too chickensh** to dish out a ticket or 3. he paid off the law enforcement to keep it "hush hush".
To: Flux Capacitor
the award for "Most Jaw-Droppingly Gorgeous Congressional Candidate" must go to....
Melissa Martin (VA CD-08).
And yes.... she's a Republican. Ah, but she faces serious competition from:
Erin Zweigart (IL CD-12)
And yes...she's also a Republican. :-D
165
posted on
12/08/2003 9:56:14 PM PST
by
BillyBoy
(George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
Comment #166 Removed by Moderator
To: Kaslin
January the 20th is not soon enough. This piece of filth is a scab on his state and the whole Republican party. He needs to step down now.
167
posted on
12/09/2003 5:27:39 AM PST
by
dasher
To: TexKat
I do not like this idea that someone who was not in the trial can be happy because the vedict matches his own judgement, based on information that comes through the press. It seems that Janklow was convicted on this site without a trial. If your sister has diabetes, then you should know that low blood sugar reactions can come without warning. Most posters to this site think that is obsurb. It shows their ignorance, and their arogance that everything in heaven and earth can receive a definitive judgement here.
To: HapaxLegamenon
... you should know that low blood sugar reactions can come without warning. The contention is that people who KNOW their ability to drive safely can be compromised, without warning, shouldn't drive. Plus, regardless of knee-jerk postings and reactions here, Janklow's conviction came from a jury, not from Free Republic.
169
posted on
12/09/2003 7:08:05 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
So you would not any diabetic drive?
My comments are not directed at the jury, but precisely at the knee-jerk postings and reactions here.
To: HapaxLegamenon
The man has a terrible driving record, admits himself that he speeds all the time. He's blown the same stop sign before at least once causing a near miss. This is not about being diabetic and driving a car. This is about the jury seeing through his lies and doing the right thing. He lied with the low blood sugar defence and the jusry didn't buy it. Good for them.
171
posted on
12/09/2003 8:09:36 AM PST
by
dasher
To: HapaxLegamenon
So you would not any diabetic drive? I think only some diabetics have a condition that renders them suddenly, and without warning, unable to drive safely. And yes, people who KNOW they can be rendered, suddenly and without warning, unable to drive safely, should not put themselves and others at risk.
Notice all those conditions ... "suddenly", "without warning", and "unable to drive safely." Are you asserting that all diabetics meet thos criteria?
172
posted on
12/09/2003 8:17:08 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: dasher
January the 20th is not soon enough. This piece of filth is a scab on his state and the whole Republican party. He needs to step down now.At least he is stepping down. You know if he were a democRat he wouldn't even think of stepping down and the liberals would be lockstep behind him
173
posted on
12/09/2003 8:19:04 AM PST
by
Kaslin
To: RamingtonStall
"He needs to be ousted immediately."
Couldn't agree with you more. His voluntary resignation may result in receiving a fat pension for the rest of his life. Perhaps ousting him would prevent such largess from happening? Anyone know?
To: Cboldt
This could happen to any diabetic taking insulin. It may be unlikely, but it is a chance with anyone on insulin.
To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
Some good possible candidates, but one point about SD politics is the "west river" factor. People clearly connected to Sioux Falls--e.g. former Sioux Falls mayor Gary Hanson, Sioux Falls business woman Barb Everest etc. will not gain GOP votes much west of Highway 81 and certainly not west of the Missouri River. To the west river folk Sioux Falls is a suburb of Minneapolis and not representative of the rest of the state. The further west in the state the stronger the sense of distance from Sioux Falls.
To: HapaxLegamenon
This could happen to any diabetic taking insulin. It may be unlikely, but it is a chance with anyone on insulin. It (sudden, unexpected lapse into inability to drive safely) can happen to anybody. Heart attacks, strokes, old-age "confused the gas with the brake," etc. happen. The law draws a line "somewhere" that prohibits a person, who knows they are at risk, from driving. Obviously, that line is not drawn in such a way that prohibits all insulin-takers from driving. But I bet some insulin-takers, those with a history of falling into diabetic shock, have enough sense to not drive.
The jury, who heard the entire case, found Janklow guilty. That is hardly a slap at all diabetics.
177
posted on
12/09/2003 1:17:58 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: HapaxLegamenon
The I did not have any thing to eat for 18 hours was a bald face lie. And to use the illness of diabetes as a defense tactic is lower than a snakes belly.
178
posted on
12/09/2003 1:54:10 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: HapaxLegamenon
I do not like this idea that someone who was not in the trial can be happy because the vedict matches his own judgement, based on information that comes through the press. If you are referring to me, go right ahead. Happy would not be a word I would use in this matter. But for myself I am pleased that the jury saw through this lie and convicted Janklow. There are other aspects of the case that would/should prevent people from rejoicing. One being that the deceased is still dead and his love ones have to suffer the pain and lost. And then there is Mrs. Janklow, possibly some Janklow grandchildren.
One thing for sure diabetes was not on trial. A wreckless inconsiderate vehicle driving individual was.
179
posted on
12/09/2003 2:05:38 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
Had this been a democrap of the "minority" race... he would have skated...
This does NOT prove the system works, per se, only that it works when the target is a republican, of the majority race in this nation.
A paul wellstone would have skated too, even though a white guy, he WAS a democrat. Lieberman would have gone to the chair, as he is too "centrist" and conservative for most democrapts. Any LIBERAL DEM would get the once over, whereas a JC Watts would have been fried.
That said, the guilty in no case, are innocent.
This guy deserves what he gets.
180
posted on
12/09/2003 9:33:06 PM PST
by
Robert_Paulson2
(robert... the rino... LWMPTBHFTOSTA....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson