Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore to Endorse Dean
Foxnews Alert | 12-8-03

Posted on 12/08/2003 1:44:37 PM PST by RWR8189

Just heard it on Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2004election; albertgore; albertgorejr; albore; algore; algorejr; algorleone; alwhore; badkisser; clintongore; dean; deanieweenie; election2004; endore; endorsement; gore; harlemshuffle; howarddean; juniorspeaks; kissofdeath; manofwood; soreloserman; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-503 next last
To: jackbill
Interesting. The DU'ers seem to think that "Bush will be retired" in 2004.

Here is a link to their dreadful thread

361 posted on 12/08/2003 3:29:49 PM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Al Gore needed a half dozen consultants to figure out what color suit to wear. I don't think he has much in the way of political intuition. He does have lots of anger over 2000 though.

Chris Matthews actually said, when commenting on this news today, that Gore "nobly accepted" the Supreme Court decision back in 2000.

Poor Chris, always swayed by pretty words. He was very taken with Gore's concession speech (which I will grant was well written and delivered), but he ignores Gore's subsequent words and behavior, which have NOT been noble. More like a big sulk.

362 posted on 12/08/2003 3:29:54 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Not once has Bill or Hillary said anything even remotely critical of Dean.

Indirectly they both have criticized Dean's position on Iraq, if not Dean himself. But they don't care, for all the reasons you detailed, they have seen to it that no potentially electable candidate could build the support necessary to actually win the nomination. Gore endorsing Dean probably has both of the Clinton's laughing at how well things are working out for them and their 2008 plan.

363 posted on 12/08/2003 3:30:16 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Darn, I had my fingers crossed that he would endorse Bush!
364 posted on 12/08/2003 3:31:36 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Excellent analysis, it clearly shows just who's running the Democratic Party, a party in disarray. This endorsement can only help destroy it even further.
365 posted on 12/08/2003 3:32:23 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
The one thing the Democrats wanted to avoid, namely a drawn out, bruising and competitive primary, will be completely avoided.

The Clinton, McAuliffe, Clark (centrist) camp could have made a smokey back room deal with the Dean, Gore (looney left) camp. Even though the Clintons don't want Dean to win over Bush (because it kills Hillary's 2008 run), they are willing to play ball for some concessions.

They all agree to unite behind Dean now to avoid the bruising primaries, as you (William McKinley) said. But that doesn't mean they are all permanently in league, just that they cut a deal. Once the dust settles (Dean loses), they will be at each other's throats again (over control of the DNC).

366 posted on 12/08/2003 3:32:27 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Looks like it might be one, big, happy family instead of the dysfunctional one which has been the conventional wisdom. And it is looking more and more like the one thing the Democrats wanted to avoid, namely a drawn out, bruising and competitive primary, will be completely avoided.

You're assuming that the primaries and caucuses are mere formalities at this point. They're not. The only places where Dean is really getting blowout numbers is in New Hampshire. He's only in first within the margin of error in Iowa. Nationwide he's only getting 15% support and is tied with The Weasel.

ANYTHING can still happen in this clusterf*ck (®John Kerry). Gephardt still stands an excellent chance of winning Iowa. Any sort of weirdness could happen in South Carolina. Dean could simply peak too early (it's over two months before the first primary). Remember: In 2002, a guy named Bill Clinton barely even registered in Iowa, getting only 3%, and lost big time in New Hampshire to that powerhouse Paul Tsongas. Only after those humiliating defeats did The War Room get their act together and start racking up wins in state after state.

Those other candidates still want to win, especially Lieberman, Gephardt, Clark and Kerry. They're not going to roll over for Dean. They're going to fight, and fight mean.

367 posted on 12/08/2003 3:33:14 PM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: diamondjoe
What does Gore want in a Dean administration? State or Interior?

I was just on Atrios' blog reading the comments to this story. They all have the election won and Dean as president. I was banned as they were starting to pick the cabinet. It won't let me back into comments to even read them so maybe someone can go over there and give us their "dream cabinet".

368 posted on 12/08/2003 3:35:05 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
An interesting theory you got there...
369 posted on 12/08/2003 3:35:57 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Gore endorsement bump
370 posted on 12/08/2003 3:36:49 PM PST by BigBadBrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: All

371 posted on 12/08/2003 3:37:03 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: TomB
They're all singing Kumbiyah, that's all.
372 posted on 12/08/2003 3:39:27 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: All

373 posted on 12/08/2003 3:40:04 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
LOL!
374 posted on 12/08/2003 3:40:58 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy; cyncooper; aristeides
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=1&u=/ap/20031208/ap_on_el_pr/gore_dean

"...In choosing Dean, Gore bypassed his own vice presidential pick in 2000, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who has been struggling in his bid to capture the Democratic nomination. Lieberman even waited until after Gore made his decision last December not to run before embarking on his candidacy.


The Lieberman campaign issued a terse statement Monday, saying, "I have a lot of respect for Al Gore — that is why I kept my promise not to run if he did. Ultimately, the voters will make the determination and I will continue to make my case about taking our party and nation forward."


Lieberman spokesman Jano Cabrera said Gore did not tell the Connecticut senator about the endorsement.


Another Dean rival, Rep. Dick Gephardt of Iowa, issued a statement questioning Gore's decision.


"Dick Gephardt fought side-by-side with Al Gore to pass the Clinton economic plan, pass the assault weapons ban and defend against Republican attacks on Medicare and affirmative action. On each of these issues, Howard Dean was on the wrong side," said Erik Smith, Gephardt's campaign spokesman.

375 posted on 12/08/2003 3:41:20 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN!!!

 

1980

85,496,851 Total Votes.  52.6% of Eligible Voters.

Candidate Party Popular Vote Electoral College Percent
Ronald Reagan (CA)
George Bush (TX)
Republican 43,901,812 489 50.8%
Jimmy Carter (GA)
Walter Mondale (MN)
Democrat 35,483,820 49 41.0%
John Anderson (IL) Independent 5,719,437 0 6.6%
Ed Clark (CA) Libertarian 921,299 0 1.1%

National Conventions

Republican: Detroit, MI 7/14/80
Democrat:  New York, NY 8/11/80

Ronald Reagan (R): 489  Jimmy Carter (D):  49

width="324" height="265">

 

1984
"It's morning again in America"

92,641,042 Total Votes.  53.1% of Eligible Voters.

Candidate Party Popular Vote Electoral College Percent
Ronald Reagan (CA)
George Bush (TX)
Republican 54,455,000 525 58.8%
Walter Mondale (MN)
Geraldine Ferraro (NY)
Democrat 37,577,000 13 40.5%
David Berland (CA) Libertarian 228,314 0  
Lyndon LaRouche (VA) Independent 78,807 0  

National Conventions

Republican:  Dallas, TX 8/20/84
Democrat:  San Francisco, CA 7/16/84

Ronald Reagan (R): 525  Walter Mondale (D):  13

width="326" height="264">

 

1988
 "Read My Lips, No New Taxes"

TOTAL: 91,594,136 Total Votes.  50.1% of Eligible Voters.

Candidate Party Popular Vote Electoral College Percent
George H.W. Bush (TX)
James Danforth Quayle (IN)
Republican 48,886,097 426 53.4%
Michael Dukakis (MA)
Lloyd Bentson (MN)
Democrat 41,809,074 111 45.6%
Lloyd Bentson (MN)**
Michael Dukakis (MA)
Democrat   1  
Ron Paul (TX) Libertarian 431,616 0  
Lenore Fulani (NY) New Alliance 217,200 0  
David Duke (LA) Populist 46,910 0  
Eugene McCarthy (MN) Consumer 30,903 0  

**One elector from West Virginia voted for Lloyd Bentsen for President and Michael Dukakis for Vice President.

National Conventions:

Republican:  New Orleans, LA 08/15/1988
Democrat:  Atlanta, GA 07/18/1988

George Bush (R): 426   Michael Dukakis (D): 111  Lloyd Bentson (D): 1



 

 

HOME

 


 

 

376 posted on 12/08/2003 3:43:30 PM PST by Rome2000 (McCarthy was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Yes, but when Dean loses in '04 does he remain the presumed head Dem? No. Hill will depose him after he loses.

Hillary will wellstone Dean sometime in October 2004.

377 posted on 12/08/2003 3:43:51 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: All
does anyone know where I can get Savage online??? I know it is off topic but it is getting close to the 4 O'clock rant that I have grown to love. Pray request to help me find Michael Savage... Bawawwawawawawa
378 posted on 12/08/2003 3:46:05 PM PST by Porterville (No communist or french)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
We'll see.

If Hillary endorses Dean before Iowa, I'll be convinced that he really was their guy all along. Remember, his big issue was originally going to be health care, with a plan which was very much similar to Hillarycare.

379 posted on 12/08/2003 3:46:06 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I was just on Atrios' blog reading the comments to this story. They all have the election won and Dean as president.

Time for some people to look up "myopic" in the dictionary. I don't see where this endorsement adds much of anything to Dean's campaign, other than helping shore up Dean's appeal with the very people already guaranteed to vote for Dean in the primaries anyway: The angry, bitter, mean, vicious left.

380 posted on 12/08/2003 3:46:24 PM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson