Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin to assume the power of a Tsar
Telegraph ^ | December 12 2003 | Julius Strauss

Posted on 12/08/2003 5:11:21 AM PST by blanknoone

President Vladimir Putin took control of the Russian parliament last night, removing the last effective bastion of opposition to his rule and paving the way for him to assume Tsar-like power.

A sailor leaves a polling booth in the Black Sea port of Sevastopol Exit polls last night gave United Russia, the president's party, 37 per cent of the vote, the Communists 15 per cent and Vladimir Zhirinovsky's Liberal Democrats 12 per cent. Rodina, a new nationalist party, was predicted to have won nine per cent.

This would give Mr Putin's party and its allies about 58 per cent of the vote and return Russia to an era of single-party dominance after 12 years of vibrant, if corrupt, democracy.

With 11.33 per cent of the votes counted, United Russia had 36.3 per cent, the Liberal Democrats 14.8 per cent, the Communists 12.9 and Rodina 7.7 per cent.

Liberals predicted the election would come to be seen as a milestone on the country's slow regression towards Soviet-style authoritarianism.

United Russia is hoping that it might win a two-thirds majority in the new State Duma which would give it the power to change the constitution at will.

Rumours abound that Mr Putin, who is all but certain to win a second term in March next year, wants to scrap a clause limiting the president to two terms in office.

Officially the former KGB spy is above the fray and should not endorse United Russia, the party he created to support him four years ago. But, in an address 10 days ago, he said the election would determine "whether my hands and feet are tied, whether the president would be able to do his work or not".

In economic terms Russia is a robust and brash capitalist economy, which has embraced the principle of private ownership, but politically Mr Putin and his entourage now dominate the country.

Anna Pastukhova, an official with Memorial, a Russian human rights organisation, in the Urals town of Yekaterinburg, said: "We are moving back to a time of less freedom and democracy and more control. Our local governor, who is with United Russia, said that it is right we should have in this country one dominant party and a few small ones. What kind of a vision is that?"

The Communists, traditionally the country's largest parliamentary party, have been subjected to weeks of vicious attack on national and local television. The result has been that United Russia has surged ahead of them in recent weeks after level-pegging in the autumn.

Gennady Zyuganov, the veteran Communist leader, said: "The election campaign has been an evil farce. Formally the parliament will be elected but in fact it will be appointed by the presidential administration."

The first step in the reversal of Russian democracy came in 1993 when President Yeltsin stripped parliament of many of its powers, handing them to himself.

Since Mr Putin came to office in 2000 the process has been accelerated. Opposition-controlled media have been neutered and tycoons unwilling to toe the Kremlin line exiled or jailed. United Russia, invented by Mr Putin as a vehicle for his policies in the State Duma, has risen in importance.

Victory today will represent a remarkable achievement for a party that has no ideology and only the barest outline of a political platform.

Its identity is so amorphous that its campaign posters carry pictures of both Stalin and Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the veteran Soviet-era dissident.

In the run-up to the elections, its leaders have refused to hold television debates, suggesting they were above such things.

Many United Russia supporters say they will back the party simply because it is already in power. One man, a driver, said he would vote for it because "they are the bosses".

Officially each party is limited to spending about £5 million on the election campaign but independent estimates say United Russia may have spent hundreds of millions.

Western observers say the slanted media coverage and incidents of gerrymandering mean this Russian election is the least democratic since Boris Yeltsin came to power.

"It's far worse than in 1999," one observer said. "We warned the government that they must stop the abuses but they don't care what we think."

As a result, the only two liberal parties presently in the Duma - Yabloko and the Union of Right Forces - may fail to achieve the five per cent needed for representation.

The only group of voters set to outstrip United Russia supporters are those who have become so alienated that they will not vote at all - as many as 40 per cent of Russia's 110 million eligible voters.

Polling was conducted amid tight security after a suicide bombing on a packed commuter train in Yessentuki in southern Russia claimed 42 lives on Friday. A man believed to have conspired in the attack was arrested yesterday. Chechen separatists are suspected of seeking to disrupt the election.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: elections; putin; putinrussia; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
This is a little alarmist, but an interesting take on Russian election results.
1 posted on 12/08/2003 5:11:21 AM PST by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
bump
2 posted on 12/08/2003 5:18:29 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: William Creel; RussianConservative
Well, doesn't this just blow.
4 posted on 12/08/2003 5:24:24 AM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: blanknoone
What do you want to bet that now that Putin has control of the Duma, liberals start trashing Putin and his party as "rethuglicans"? Too bad for communism, eh?
6 posted on 12/08/2003 6:40:39 AM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
Time for the Ruskies to have another little revolution???
7 posted on 12/08/2003 6:44:04 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
As a result, the only two liberal parties presently in the Duma - Yabloko and the Union of Right Forces - may fail to achieve the five per cent needed for representation. ==

Heh heh:). Is it nothing to do thier slant toward oligarkh money. Oligarkhs are russian mafia. SO those tow parties went on dirty money and deeply failed.
8 posted on 12/08/2003 6:44:59 AM PST by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Re post 7, won't happen. The Russians tend to be 99.44 percent followers, sheeple of the worst kind. Many are masochistic enough to even want the proverbial "Strong Man" in charge, someone to direct their lives. This is what follows 70 years of communism...initiative disappears.

In summary, it's my humble opinion that real democracy in that country is a lost cause.
9 posted on 12/08/2003 7:13:18 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
I was speaking of another COMMUNIST revolution now that they are a minority. I agree that for some reason the Russian people prefer the lash, the yoke and the noose.
10 posted on 12/08/2003 7:16:30 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
OK, I agree that that is a real possibility. Either way, the Russian people lose, of course.
11 posted on 12/08/2003 7:23:24 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
The Russian people have always lost, for hundreds of years. Difficult to understand why they willingly submit to the iron fist. Sad
12 posted on 12/08/2003 7:26:44 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
So let me get this straight. They're saying that the only hope for freedom is for the people to vote for more communists and that if the capitalists gain anymore power they will destroy the country. Kinda' sounds like the American media's take on politics.
13 posted on 12/08/2003 7:27:09 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
President Vladimir Putin took control of the Russian parliament last night, removing the last effective bastion of opposition to his rule and paving the way for him to assume Tsar-like power.

Well, wait, is not Blair then King (never mind powerless crown jewel who sit in Buckingham palace). He rule is endless as long as labor stay in power....hmmm, who more king now? There no particular election for prime minister as long as majority power held.....what about George Bush or is it Ceasar Bush? After all, Republican hold both room of Congress?

14 posted on 12/08/2003 7:56:12 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
So you suggesting what? Communists retake power now that they only 13% of Duma? Which side you happen on?
15 posted on 12/08/2003 7:57:14 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
Guess you little of real Russian character...your post make obvious. As for strong man...yes much better under corrupt US puppet Yeltsin when all soul of Russia for sale to West....image that it not work for Russians.
16 posted on 12/08/2003 7:58:39 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
What have Russian peoples lost? Hmmm? First labor protection laws? Made under Catherine the Great, sedition to translate in England and France. Wars? Which one? Napolianic? 5 Turkish? WW2? Or you refer to Mongol invasion? What lost? Back up words with fact. As for Civil War...yeah if only US/British businessmen like Armnhammer, Rockefeller, Rothchilde and German Kaiser had not given hundreds millions to Bolshaviks, maybe different history.
17 posted on 12/08/2003 8:01:14 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Suggesting nothing, not on anyones side as that is not the question.
18 posted on 12/08/2003 8:01:54 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
What you expect, it is British...from Londonistan...see, only chance for Britian culture survive is import of more islamics to welfare state. No really...
19 posted on 12/08/2003 8:02:12 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
I was speaking of another COMMUNIST revolution now that they are a minority. I agree that for some reason the Russian people prefer the lash, the yoke and the noose.

So you for or against Communists? You seem to advocate another Communist revolution in spill. State position and not this "neutral". Also, lash? Hahahah, when you ever been in Russia? Or you get info from paperback novel?

As for communist revolution, only if Western hypocrits first ship mass of geritol. Average age Communist membership 55. Good luck.

20 posted on 12/08/2003 8:04:56 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson