Posted on 12/05/2003 4:22:27 AM PST by I Am Not A Mod
Why can't you post things like this using your regular screen ID? Just curious, thanks.
Really!
Here are your drug warrior related posts since December 1, I don't begin to even touch your total number of posts on the subject. And I have not included our most recent posts back forth on the subject. Sorry for the lack of paragraphs, but the large number of your posts has kept me from being able to compartmentalize all your numerous posts on these drug warrior threads.
To: Nathan Zachary
Slow drivers cause accidents as well. How many of you yell at some old geezer driving 20 miles an hour in a 60 MPH zone? look at all the people trying to get around him on a 2 lane hwy, risking head on collisions?
Let's see: it's the drivers trying to pass who are risking head on collision yet the slow driver is the cause? I find that when I do 70 mph in a 65 mph zone on the Interstate I have people crowding my bumper waiting for the chance to whip around me and I rarely pass anyone myself at that speed. I guess I'm a hazard on the road and a cause of dangerous situations. 84 posted on 12/06/2003 7:04:27 AM PST by TigersEye
To: R. Scott Smoke harms lungs! Truly amazing. Tommorow's headline: Sun rises in the east again! To which a contingent of idiots loudly proclaims: "We told you so!"
130 posted on 12/06/2003 6:54:17 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: AxelPaulsenJr; robertpaulsen; jmc813; No King but Jesus So you admit that No King but Jesus is LeRoy? To: AxelPaulsenJr Not the same guy as MrLeRoy. Neither was The Coach. 103 posted on 12/05/2003 3:57:06 PM EST by Lead Moderator Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! What a maroon. AxelPaulsenJr ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: PaxMacian $50/ounce? All that interdiction isn't making it any more costly. It wasn't that cheap in the 60's. You must be young. A lid went for $5 and a lid was a four finger baggie. Quite a bit more than an ounce. It was up to $15 by 1970 and as much as $35 per weighed oz. by '73 when I graduated HS. Interdiction in and of itself doesn't drive the price up or lessen the supply. It's the mere illegality and prosecution efforts that drive prices. 28 posted on 12/04/2003 7:52:55 PM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: PaxMacian $50 per oz is a lot for Mexican though. $17 on the third turnover is more like it but that would make this bust sound too penny ante. 29 posted on 12/04/2003 7:58:59 PM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: No King but Jesus Such is the nature of a zombie I suppose. They will cheer this up until their own ox is gored and a 20 second "knock-and-kick" home invasion is done to them for something other than drugs. Like, say, suspicion of failure to register an "assault gun!?!" These extra-legal quick fixes never stay where you put them. The nature of a legal precedent is like a hot tar patch on the living room floor. Pretty soon tar has been tracked all over the house. 12 posted on 12/04/2003 6:49:55 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schindler Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: robertpaulsen The Supreme Court set no firm limit. Of course not. They have to leave a little wiggle room for themselves. They wouldn't want to be held to account for anything now would they!?! 13 posted on 12/04/2003 6:53:03 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schindler Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: TigersEye Justice David H. Souter, writing for the court, said that because police believed there were drugs inside, officers had more reason to rush. No kidding!?! Of course the police have reason to rush in they are trying to make a bust. These cases aren't brought to you black-robed-geniuses to tell us what motivates the police. You are supposed to determine the Constitutionality of their actions not their reasons, Idjit. 8 posted on 12/03/2003 8:56:40 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: kattracks Justice David H. Souter, writing for the court, said that because police believed there were drugs inside, officers had more reason to rush. So regardless of why they want you if they believe there are drugs inside they can "knock-and- kick." That's the lie the BATfags told a judge about Koresh and company at Waco in order to get military personnel involved. The Constitution is just buttwipe to these justices. 5 posted on 12/02/2003 10:19:21 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: kattracks It's time again to assert what should be obvious. I don't recognize no-knock warrants. Forced entry into my house will be met with lethal force whether it is announced or not. As a U.S. citizen with no legal impediments I am always armed with multiple choices of weapons at hand. I support and encourage all other U.S. citizens to follow this example. 3 posted on 12/02/2003 10:08:46 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Prime Choice bttt 10 posted on 12/02/2003 9:38:53 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
You're pretty funny. Our recent posts back and forth were not on the subject of drugs. They were on the subject of your paranoia.
Going back to Dec. 1st is funny too. You haven't posted near as much as I have on anything in that period. But if one simply does a find in forum on you and goes back a page they'll find a much heavier trend of posting on the WODdie threads. When cornered - SPAM!
Let's just call it a day, and go on our own seperate ways, for quite honestly I tire of you.
Perhaps some. It is funny how a large percentage of them were against private enterprise. :^)
That's right! This does explain a lot. Anti-capitalism, taking the word of enemies over our own military and so forth.
That's fine with me. No one forced you to respond to me in the first place. I find your type of crusade against posters you disagree with tiring. And of little value. I made my point about it at the outset; you chose to give it credence by responding with an attack similar to your attacks on No King But Jesus.
I'm sure I would appreciate your views on many things. I wouldn't dislike you or discount your opinion about the WOD's simply because it opposes mine. It is your method that I find disagreeable and unproductive. That's your choice. I hold no power to stop you and have no desire to force a change or prevent you from acting as you will. As I told Protagoras; I don't ping the Mods.
I won't be hoping for or against a response from you but don't feel like you can't talk to me. You can't intimidate or humiliate me out of my POV but you can surely talk to me and possibly even change my mind on some things if you try.
Give the other poster a little respect, whether you agree with them or not, and you will find it may be returned. That's what's happened here but it took you quite a while to give it a try. But I admit; I opened with a shot to your port side. I feel I was justified in doing it. Your mileage may vary!
Have a great day and may you crush many liberals beneath your feet.
Unless I misunderstand you it was you who first posted to me with a personal attack. And you not being part of the original conversation that I was involved.
I find your type of crusade against posters you disagree with tiring. And of little value. I made my point about it at the outset; you chose to give it credence by responding with an attack similar to your attacks on No King But Jesus.
LeRoy was a siminar poster who beat the issue to death, and attempted to use this forum to promote his illegal cause. He was justly banned for that activity.
I'm sure I would appreciate your views on many things. I wouldn't dislike you or discount your opinion about the WOD's simply because it opposes mine. It is your method that I find disagreeable and unproductive.
What method is that? I made the comment that I think that No King but Jesus is really LeRoy. That is an obervation made in a disucssion forum, and I think in no way shows the other poster disrespect. Unless that is he deserves to be disrespected.. I don't agree that that is a personal attack.
That's your choice. I hold no power to stop you and have no desire to force a change or prevent you from acting as you will. As I told Protagoras; I don't ping the Mods.
I won't be hoping for or against a response from you but don't feel like you can't talk to me. You can't intimidate or humiliate me out of my POV
I wouldn't dream of doing such, nor would I have ever begun to think that my actions and words were in anyway an attempt to intimidate you.
but you can surely talk to me and possibly even change my mind on some things if you try.
I must admit here that I really desire no further conversation with you, for reasons that I don't care to go into any more than I already have illustrated.
Give the other poster a little respect,
And this statement is a prime example of why I feel that it would be a waste of time for the two of us to further converse. "Give the other poster a little respect"?
By stating the fair and honest opinion that I believe LeRoy to be No King but Jesus, is not a sign of disrespect. But whatever.
whether you agree with them or not, and you will find it may be returned. That's what's happened here but it took you quite a while to give it a try. But I admit; I opened with a shot to your port side. I feel I was justified in doing it. Your mileage may vary!
Have a great day and may you crush many liberals beneath your feet.
Likewise have a great day and a Merry Christmas.
A point by point response is a funny way to show it. I suspect it's my point by point response to that that you'd rather not see.
Merry Christmas!
If God is good and he is, we will never have to talk to each other again. At least that is I will never initiate an original post to you. Just not worth it. Like talking to the wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.