Posted on 12/04/2003 3:13:39 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
From MEMRI (Translated from the Original Arabic language article).
Special Dispatch - Syria/Iraq In English: December 5, 2003 (Based on Nov. 4, 5 and 6 articles)
Editor of Kuwaiti Daily: "Syria's Secret Service is Behind the 'Iraqi Resistance'"
TRANSLATION FROM ARABIC:
"The November 1, 2003 conference of foreign ministers of the countries neighboring Iraq yielded numerous articles in the Arab press condemning Syria's pro-Saddam stance. Among the authors were editor of the Kuwaiti daily Al-Siyassa, Ahmad Al-Jarallah, and Iraqi opposition member and political commentator Dr. Riyadh Al-Amir. The following are excerpts from the articles:
Iraqi Resistance, Directed by Syria’s Secret Service
In an article(1) published in the Kuwaiti daily Al-Siyassa titled "Syria is Committing Suicide in Baghdad, and No One Besides Her is Dying," Ahmad Al-Jarallah wrote: "On the face of it, Syria washes its hands, because it is Iraqis who are resisting the American occupation - even though suicide bombers possessing Syrian identity cards with serial numbers of the [Syrian] secret service have been apprehended... Even regimes like Fidel Castro's in Cuba... have renounced these hoary political games. [But in Syria] they are back, [with] a new hoax called 'the Iraqi opposition.'
"By receiving the delegation of Iraqi opposition leaders, Syrian President Dr. Bashar Al-Assad signaled a new era in the Syrian-led Iraqi struggle to drown the Americans in the Tigris and Euphrates, just as [Syria] threatened in the past to throw the Jews into the sea. The way the announcement of the reception was publicized [shows that it was] fabricated by the Syrian secret services... and that... Syria has learned nothing from its historical experience, from the vicissitudes of time, and from the changes in the regimes and countries [of the region]... This vulgar method... of inventing imaginary puppets used by Syria to defy the U.S. - the most recent puppet being the 'Iraqi opposition'... lures no one into this pathetic game, [attesting to Syria's] stagnant and good-for-nothing intellect that can generate nothing else...
"When, during Saddam's era, the Americans received members of the Iraqi opposition, the Arabs - led by Syria - claimed that this handful did not represent the Iraqi people and were nothing but political agents of the American foreign policy and intelligence services. It would be interesting to know whose agents the resistance members received by Bashar Al-Assad are, and whom they represent. Are they indeed Iraqis, or perhaps Syrians from the other bank of the Euphrates...? In the past, we watched festive Lebanese and Palestinian rallies... which turned out to be rallies by Syrian secret service regiments completely unconnected to the Lebanese or Palestinian people... It is altogether likely that this Iraqi resistance was created by the same false methods..."
Syria Must Realize Its Ephemeral Stature
"Syria's current [political] discourse is that of a superpower... But reality is different, and the best thing for the current Damascus regime to do is stop pretending to be a superpower and acknowledge its actual capabilities... Any deviation from this means a dangerous, disastrous path leading to self-destruction... Syria must acknowledge its status as a small state in the Arab region and an ephemeral country in the international arena that can easily be surrounded and altered... [Unlike] Iraq, Syria has never had financial power equal to Saddam Hussein's - which enabled him to buy the political conscience [of the world's statesmen]."
Syrian Foreign Policy: Parasitism, Anachronistic Calculations
In a follow-up article(2) titled "Another War of Liberation is Not Inconceivable," Al-Jarallah wrote: "The hope of the Syrian regime - [that is,] reactivating the principles of its policy... of interfering in other [Middle East countries'] business by means of a conference of foreign ministers of countries neighboring Iraq... has proved to be in vain... This is because the regional role so desired by the Syrian regime stems not from any real power or any centrality of its actions, but from an inherent parasitic tendency that has turned Damascus into a state living off others...
"The countries... that answered Syria's call [to convene] have shown greater [political] acumen than their host, managing to turn the tables on [Syria's] plan for a Syrian-led anti-American conference... They forced the Syrian regime to adopt a rational position, to grasp reality... and to realize that, given the current international reality, its political calculations are anachronistic... The Syrian regime's prediction that Congress's Syria Accountability Act had no chance of passage because it was inconceivable... was proved false, [because] it was based on erroneous calculations. The law was ratified... because today Syria is endangering American and global interests in the Middle East, particularly since maintaining the Syrian regime is no longer in anyone's interest...
"Through what [tools] does Syria try to confront the world as it [engages] in imaginary political calculations, as did Saddam Hussein in maintaining that a U.S. attack was inconceivable...? What regional role is Syria demanding for itself today - and wanting the U.S. and the world to welcome and entrust [Syria] with it... except for the role of parasite and controlling others - first Lebanon, and now Iraq...?"
The Syrian Regime: Losing Justification for its Existence
"The [current] Syrian regime has no place in a changing [reality]... Anyone who desires power... and regional status at the international level must [first] possess power at the domestic level. Is the Syrian regime strong in its own country? Tyranny and repression by police and the secret service are not considered signs of power. If Syria imagines that brutality and ruling by apparatuses and domestic terror qualify it to take on a regional role, [it is mistaken]. In this era of liberty... these are no longer recognized as qualifications for [legitimate rule]. Is the Syrian regime economically strong? Has it built a common denominator - even with a single Syrian citizen - such as creating employment opportunities or safeguarding human dignity...?
"These norms attest to the extreme weakness of the Syrian regime, and to its limited common interests with its citizens... and to the parasitic relations between them. How can the Syrian regime... with its [foreign-]credit-based parasitic economy that robs others of their power to produce, demand an international role, while within Syria itself it plays almost no role apart from the presence of secret services that use terror and death and have a great propensity for destruction. It is inconceivable for a regime so strongly based on this kind of power and lacking any plan for economic growth to be able to fight. In a case like this, its weapons will be like Don Quixote's wooden swords... and its fate like [the regime of] Saddam Hussein..."
Syria's Gamble on Iraqi Resistance is Doomed to Failure
In an article posted on the liberal Arabic website www.elaph.com(3) titled "The Old and New Syrian Guard Are in the Same Pit," Dr. Riyadh Al-Amir wrote: "[When] Syrian Prime Minister Mustafa Miro gave Saddam Hussein a golden sword... did this express Syrian gratitude for Saddam's many abortive attempts to assassinate Hafez Al-Assad, or, perhaps, for transporting Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to Syria in trains and trucks just prior to the launch of [U.N.] searches? Maybe it was for transferring the plundered treasures of the Iraqi people... and depositing them in Syrian government banks to revive Syria's ailing economy...?
"The closing announcement [of the conference of foreign ministers of countries neighboring Iraq] looks today like a mad dash backwards... Where did the condemnation of the coalition's offensive disappear to - [the offensive] that liberated the Iraqi people from a deviant regime and an obviously rotten ideology...? Why didn't the communiquEmention the stance of the countries helping terrorist organizations infiltrate Iraq, while Iraqis now know that it is Syria overseeing the terrorist recruitment offices, with the aid of the remnants of Saddam's regime...?
"The Syrian foreign minister declared that his country could not prevent infiltrators from entering Iraq. How is it that the Syria-Israel border can be sealed?... And how is it that during Saddam's time Syria could seal its borders against the Iraqi opposition...?
"All this is for what? To roll back the wheel of history [in Iraq], or to rebuild in it an Arab entity of the same failed Ba'athist model, or the one on the verge of collapse in Damascus...? Whence cometh this fear of the new Iraq? Are [Damascus's intervention attempts] aimed at preventing the exposure of the Ba'ath's ideological bankruptcy...? If it is for the sake of neighboring countries' national interests, then the distorted 'Syrian agenda' is evidence of its architect's ignorance and short-sightedness - even though he is an eye doctor... [Syria's old-new guard's] gamble [on the Iraqi resistance] is doomed to failure..."
Endnotes: (1) Al-Siyassa (Kuwait), November 5, 2003. (2) Al-Siyassa (Kuwait), November 6, 2003. (3) http://www.elaph.com, November 4, 2003.
********************* The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.
MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837 Phone: (202) 955-9070 Fax: (202) 955-9077 E-Mail: memri@memri.org www.memri.org
Recall Cambodia and vasts portions of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, essentially 'off limits' to US military action, because of neighboring Cambodian 'neutrality' in the Vietnam War (a major trans-shipment point and sanctuary for the enemy Viet Cong and North Vietnamese regulars).
Pres. Nixon ended that inaction in April, 1970. But probably too little too late.
No more sanctuaries and safe terrorist havens ("SYRIA") for the daily killers of young American men and women in Iraq!
Ten-four on that. I have a feeling that we're just not quite ready to invade Syria (politically risky before the elections), but there is so much evidence that Syria is a prime member of the Axis of Evil that when the good ol' USA is ready, we'll drop on them like a few ton of bricks. I'm sure that Israel has a huge amount of detailed plans for a precision decapitation of the Syrian regime. Hell, for all the foreign aid that we send the Israeli's, we might as well sub-contract out this job to them.
Seriously, we could simply back an Israeli attack from the south and support them with massive air power. Our story would be that Sharon had had enough of state-sponsored terrorism--the USA had tons of evidence of Syria's importation of WMD for Iraq, and exportation of terrorism all through the region--so we flipped a coin and Israel won.
Our surgical action was way too late to save the lives of all those American kids hit when the VC would come over into the RVN and get their kills and lickety split back to 'neutral' Sihanouk's safe territory (I'm talkin' pre-Lon Nol of course).
"....After full consultation with the National Security Council, Ambassador Bunker, General Abrams, and my other advisers, I have concluded that the actions of the enemy in the last 10 days clearly endanger the lives of Americans who are in Vietnam now and would constitute an unacceptable risk to those who will be there after withdrawal of another 150,000. To protect our men who are in Vietnam and to guarantee the continued success of our withdrawal and Vietnamization programs, I have concluded that the time has come for action. Tonight, I shall describe the actions of the enemy, the actions I have ordered to deal with that situation, and the reasons for my decision. Cambodia, a small country of 7 million people, has been a neutral nation since the Geneva agreement of 1954 - an agreement, incidentally, which was signed by the Government of North Vietnam. American policy since then has been to scrupulously respect the neutrality of the Cambodian people. We have maintained a skeleton diplomatic mission of fewer than 15 in Cambodia's capital, and that only since last August. For the previous 4 years, from 1965 to 1969, we did not have any diplomatic mission whatever in Cambodia. And for the past 5 years, we have provided no military assistance whatever and no economic assistance to Cambodia. North Vietnam, however, has not respected that neutrality. For the past 5 years - as indicated on this map that you see here - North Vietnam has occupied military sanctuaries all along the Cambodian frontier with South Vietnam. Some of these extend up to 20 miles into Cambodia. The sanctuaries are in red and, as you note, they are on both sides of the border. They are used for hit and run attacks on American and South Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam.....Now confronted with this situation, we have three options. First, we can do nothing. Well, the ultimate result of that course of action is clear. Unless we indulge in wishful thinking, the lives of Americans remaining in Vietnam after our next withdrawal of 150,000 would be gravely threatened. Let us go to the map again. Here is South Vietnam. Here is North Vietnam. North Vietnam already occupies this part of Laos. If North Vietnam also occupied this whole band in Cambodia, or the entire country, it would mean that South Vietnam was completely outflanked and the forces of Americans in this area, as well as the South Vietnamese, would be in an untenable military position. Our second choice is to provide massive military assistance to Cambodia itself. Now unfortunately, while we deeply sympathize with the plight of 7 million Cambodians whose country is being invaded, massive amounts of military assistance could not be rapidly and effectively utilized by the small Cambodian Army against the immediate threat. With other nations, we shall do our best to provide the small arms and other equipment which the Cambodian Army of 40,000 needs and can use for its defense. But the aid we will provide will be limited to the purpose of enabling Cambodia to defend its neutrality and not for the purpose of making it an active belligerent on one side or the other. Our third choice is to go to the heart of the trouble. That means cleaning out major North Vietnamese and Vietcong occupied territories - these sanctuaries which serve as bases for attacks on both Cambodia and American and South Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam. Some of these, incidentally, are as close to Saigon as Baltimore is to Washington. This one, for example [indicating], is called the Parrot's Beak. It is only 33 miles from Saigon. Now faced with these three options, this is the decision I have made. In cooperation with the armed forces of South Vietnam, attacks are being launched this week to clean out major enemy sanctuaries on the Cambodian-Vietnam border...."
Well, there's always that other country out that way. Maybe the Israelis will come to their aid... ;-)
That's what it's all about, the whole ball of wax.
One things fer sher, the Left will erupt {LOL}.
But seriously, we've now had a 100 year, or so, time period where the former Colonial Powers have, for all intents and purposes, turned the reins of power over to the 'locals'. What we've gotten from our 'liberality' is a lot of "failed States" (to use the recent phrase I've heard on sources like C-Span over the last 2 years) run by every kind of cruel, ruthless, degenerate thug that could achieve power in the vacumn left behind. It may indeed, for our very survival, and before they drag us down into THEIR gutter, be time to clean house and serve notice on the members of the 'Axis of Evil' that their days are numbered.
I'm reminded of the interchange in BRAVEHEART where Wallace's childhood, now adult, comrade asks in his Scottish brogue, "Where are YOU goin'?", and Wallace replies, "I'm goin' ta pick a fight".
Or hadn't you heard?
It's about hatred for the west and especially the Judaeo-Christian west...and all that goes along with it. It's about establishing a the umma - a worldwide islamic state.
The key (as it always is for us Americans) is not to make the same g-d mistake overseas in some unforsaken, confusing place. It's our young people who have to pay the price, and their grieving families and friends on the other side, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.