Posted on 12/01/2003 11:19:05 PM PST by Badray
Tonight was different than most of my evenings. I've spend many evenings involved in political discussions, but this one was at a (Wesley) Clark for President meetup. I was in the belly of the beast. One non-FReeper friend met me there, but soon left saying that to stay would just be 'too painful.' Perhaps I should have followed him out the door.
But, I didn't. And here, to the best of my recollection is what transpired over the next two hours.
MeetUp.com
I had heard about the meeting tonight from an announcement in the local paper and since it was close by, I decided that I wanted to see who supports Wesley Clark and why. There was lots of good news for the ABC (anyonebutclark) people. Ranging from poor planning to poor turnout, the meeting in my estimation was less than successful although they were thrilled with the turnout.
The meeting was in the middle of the restaurant - not in a private room - which didn't allow for them showing a video that they brought. They made reservations for 20 people and had 9 people show up including me. This was there 3rd meeting in this area (Pittsburgh Metropolitan) and they were happy to have 9 people. (Sidebar - at our 2 Toomey meetups thus far, we have had 20 & 22 people). The people themselves were very friendly. There was a teacher, 2 lawyers, an HR manager, a retired chemist, and 2 or 3 homemakers among them.
When we introduced ourselves, they all were ecstatic about being able to vote for Clark. I, in the interest of (almost) full disclosure, told them that I wasn't committed to any candidate yet and wanted to see why Clark was their choice. I didn't go into more detail at that point. They were happy to have an opportunity to try to 'convert' me. Little did they know they my agenda was to highjack the meeting and to see if it was possible to convert them.
One man who was pretty serious about the whole thing kept trying to get them to move into talking about the tactics, strategy, and logistics of campaigning. I kept asking questions and moving them away from anything substantial.
They all thought that Clark was extremely intelligent and getting better at his responses. D'uh. He's had a lifetime and two months. Thrilled at doing so well on the Letterman Show, I deflated that balloon by telling that Letterman never asks hard questions.
They talked of the last two debates and were pleased that the 9 dwarves are not attacking each other, but going after Bush. I countered that they haven't distinquished themselves yet either or shown enough difference between them to make a decision. That's why I had such a hard time trying to decide between them .
I was asked if I would vote for Bush if I couldn't find an acceptable democrat or if I would sit out. My reply was that if I found none of them acceptable, I might vote 3rd party. They cringed at that, remembering the 2000 Florida election where Nader cost algore the race. (Except when Bush stole it) When the serious guy told me that sitting out or voting 3rd party was ineffective and tandamount to voting for the incumbent, I replied that my vote was too important to cast for someone or something that I didn't believe in. That warmed the cockles of their heart even if the didn't get me to say that I'd vote for anyone to get rid of Bush.
That was their main focus. I asked who their 2nd choice would be if Clark was no longer in the race. Almost in unison, the answer was ANY ONE just to get rid of Bush. They really hate the man. Many of you know that I have not been his biggest fan, but their hatred is almost pathological in it's intensity.
When they started to attack Bush on Iraq and repeated all of the talking points of the DNC, I couldn't take it any longer. I raised my voice and told them that I voted reluctantly for Bush because I couldn't stand algore and although I wasn't pleased with a lot of Bush's policies, he was, and is right on Iraq and the overseas WoT.
The one lady lawyer started with Bush stealing the election. I stopped her immediately and told her to read up on the Electoral College and she would understand how our system works. Besides, none of the recounts showed algore won. I think that I really took them by surprise, because I was quite adamant.
They started on our soldiers dying for Bush and oil and Halliburton, yada, yada, yada. I responded that the war was just and it was the right thing to do. They shut up pretty quick when I told them (it's true) that my God-child's husband was just killed there last month.
My work was almost done. One couple got up to leave and then everyone did. They never showed the video that they brought. They gave it to me in the hopes of winning me over. I left without blowing my cover. I must be a better actor than I thought.
In conclusion, I doubt that, without lobotomies, there is any hope of converting any of these people. They really believe the democrat crap. I was treated courteously throughout and although I wasn't totally honest with them, I tried not to outright lie either. I am unsure of who gets my vote next November.
One bright spot, when I mentioned Hillary, there was almost a spontaneous expression of hope that she would just go away. As a candidate, they all thought that she had too many negatives and drew the most intense reactions and that she could sink the democrats chances of taking back the White House.
Reality doesn't scare me at all and that reality is that your rhetoric turns the majority of the American people off. That's the way it is. Your rhetoric warms the hearts of Schumer and Feinstein. You make their job easier.
Okay, I confess. I can't take the pressure. My recollection was not complete. Do you know what one of the chief complaints that they had about Bush? Cheney?
That Bush admitted that he didn't read newspapers. Can you believe it?
I asked if they thought that the President should spend his day reading papers or be involved in decison making? I said that he probably gets an indepth briefing because of a lot of people are reading a lot of papers and condensing it all into a report for him each day. Now get this -- They said it is being filtered by his staff. I said, "Who do you want to filter it? Saddam Hussein? Are you serious?" They still think that the NYT has credibility.
Cheney's horrific sin? That he is taking a pension from Haliburton and it's not in a blind trust. I said, "My God, it's a pension. He earned it. Should he give it up?" Their reply was that he is already worth $400 million (or some such number). I said that the few hundred thousand that he gets in pension shouldn't make any difference. It's not stock or an investment. It's his retirement being paid to him.
They really are vitriolic. I guess that they aren't as nice as I gave them credit for, are they?
Thank you for the kind words.
Look at it this way. After years of being single you meet 2 women. You find that the first one cheats on you every day, steals from you every day, and kicks your dog every day.
The next gal is aware that you don't like a women who cheats, steals, or kicks your dog. So you start to date her and then you find out that she does indeed cheat on you every other day, steals from you every third day, and kicks your dog once a week. Damn, she is even better looking
Now what do you do? Do you dump her? She's better you know. Do you put up with someone who is less evil or do you dump this one too?
Is any politician perfect? Are you searching for your "perfect political world". Ain't gonna happen. It just amazes me when you guys get all in a tizzy about Bush and then basically say you don't care if a demo gets in, when you don't agree with the demo 95% of the time.
Well anyway as I said to Hank, send me a post card when you reach your destination called "perfect political world". Have a feeling I will be waiting by the mailbox a long time.
I was polled by phone about a week ago here in Louisiana. Some of the key questions were on the order of "what do you think of Dean?" There were also a bunch of questions about my opinion of big business starting with GM and then getting really focused on Halliburton and some TV ads they are apparently running (which I have not seen).
I thought at the time that the polling was sponsored by Dean's campaign, but it could have been WC.
One thing for sure they didn't get much encouragement from me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.