Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roy Disney Resigns From Disney Board and Criticizes Michael Eisner; Ally Follows Suit
AP ^ | 12/1/03 | Gary Gentile

Posted on 12/01/2003 12:15:09 PM PST by Jean S

LOS ANGELES (AP) - A key ally joined Roy E. Disney in resigning from the Walt Disney Co. board Monday, becoming the second vocal opponent of chairman and chief executive Michael Eisner to quit in two days.

Stanley Gold issued a long rebuke to Eisner and the Disney board Monday, seconding complaints made Sunday by Roy Disney and further criticizing the board ad a rubber stamp to senior management.

Gold also repeated Disney's calls for Eisner to resign.

"It is clear to me that this board is unwilling to tackle the difficult issues I believe this company continues to face," Gold wrote. Among the problems, he said, were "the cannibalization of certain company icons for short-term gain, the enormous loss of creative talent over the last years, the absence of succession planning and the lack of strategic focus."

Gold's resignation comes as Disney's board begins two days of meetings in New York.

Gold played a key role along with Roy Disney in 1984 to save the company from a takeover attempt and install Eisner as chairman. He heads Shamrock Holdings, which manages Roy Disney's investments.

But Gold's role has been diminished over the past two years as he has become more of a critic of Eisner's performance.

Disney, 73, is the last family member active in the company, founded in 1923 by his uncle Walt and his father, Roy O. Disney, who was the business manager. He also is quitting as chairman of the company's animation division.

Disney has called for Eisner's resignation in the past, but the idea was rejected by the board. On Sunday, he sent a three-page letter to Eisner that criticized the chairman's leadership over the past seven years, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported the story.

"It is my sincere belief that it is you that should be leaving and not me," Disney told Eisner in the letter.

He accused Eisner of "muzzling" his voice on the board.

"Michael, I believe your conduct has resulted from my clear and unambiguous statements to you and the Board of Directors that after 19 years at the helm, you are no longer the best person to run the Walt Disney Company," Disney wrote.

His departure may have been a pre-emptive move, because the company said he is over the mandated retirement age of 72.

The board's presiding director, former Sen. George Mitchell, said in a statement Sunday he regretted Disney's actions and confirmed that the governance and nominating committee recently informed Disney that the age-limit rule, instituted last year, should apply to him.

A call to Roy Disney on Sunday was not immediately returned. A message also was left for Eisner.

Eisner is credited with transforming Disney from a producer of mediocre films and caretaker of two theme parks in 1984 into a media giant, whose holdings include five theme parks around the world, the ABC-TV network, the ESPN sports cable channel and one of the highest-grossing movie studios.

But Eisner has taken heat for what critics see as micromanaging leadership style. Detractors also accuse him of presiding over a "brain drain" that saw top executives leave the company over the past 10 years, including former studio chief Jeffrey Katzenberg, Steven Bollenbach, who now heads the Hilton Corp., and most recently Paul Pressler, who left last year to head Gap Inc.

Roy Disney's letter also blames Eisner for a loss of morale at the company and for causing a perception that the company "is rapacious, soul-less, and always looking for the 'quick buck' rather than the long-term value."

Disney's stock has fallen from more than $40 per share in 2000 to under $14 in 2002. The stock has risen nearly 34 percent since the beginning of the year as the company's fortunes have gradually improved. Disney shares closed at $23.09 at the end of trading Friday. In early afternoon trading Monday, it was up 6 cents to $23.15.

In September 2002, Eisner's plan for improving the company was unanimously approved by the board, but only after months of often bitter infighting among board members about the company's declining fortunes.

The plan included the most drastic changes in board membership since Eisner became chairman, such as bringing more independent members to a board that had long been criticized as having too cozy a relationship with Eisner. It also created the mandatory retirement age.

Since then, another vocal Eisner critic, Andrea Van de Kamp, was dropped from the board. Two other board members will not be re-nominated this year because of the age limit: 76-year-old Raymond Watson and Thomas Murphy, 77. Murphy was chairman and chief executive of Capital Cities/ABC until Disney bought the company in 1995.

---

On the Net:

http://www.disney.com

AP-ES-12-01-03 1444EST


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: disney; michaeleisner; roydisney; stanleygold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2003 12:15:11 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Weird. Then again, under Eisner, Disney is perverse.
2 posted on 12/01/2003 12:26:45 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Letter From Stanley P. Gold to the Board of Directors of the Walt Disney Company
3 posted on 12/01/2003 12:36:53 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"for causing a perception that the company "is rapacious, soul-less, and always looking for the 'quick buck' rather than the long-term value."

Wow. That is exactly how I percieve Disney, and many others. So you see, they DO know.
4 posted on 12/01/2003 12:44:08 PM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Wow. Look at his parting shot:
Perhaps acting independently, from outside the Boardroom, not hamstrung by a recently enacted Board policy barring Board members from communicating with shareholders and the media, I can have greater success in shaping the policies, practices and operations of Disney than I had as a member of the Board.
That is a clear statement of his intention to campaign openly against Eisner and his compliant slate of directors with a competing slate. He's saying that he's going to go to institutional holders (banks, mutual funds) and the public with a message of, "Vote for this new slate if you think it's time for Eisner to go."
5 posted on 12/01/2003 12:48:13 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
read later
6 posted on 12/01/2003 12:48:59 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; ALOHA RONNIE; SierraWasp; BOBTHENAILER
This is starting to get really good.

Eisner is doing ethnic cleansing on the Disney board. Anyone with a sense of morality is being forced of the board.
7 posted on 12/01/2003 1:03:06 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"I do, however, lament that my efforts over the past three years to implement needed changes has only succeeded in creating an insular Board of Directors serving as a bulwark to shield management from criticism and accountability."

Not sure if he should blame himself, though he hired Eisner, but he's right about the lack of accountability.

Not likely. The leftists who control it will destroy it before allowing Disney to go back in time and reflect the values of mainstream America.

"This is yet another attempt by this Board to squelch dissent by hiding behind the veil of 'good governance.' "

Figures. It's just more leftist fascism. Basically, he's saying Disney's senior management is an elitist clique that is bleeding the company dry and sending it to ruin. He's right.

8 posted on 12/01/2003 1:06:28 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Too many gays.
9 posted on 12/01/2003 1:08:15 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
"Vote for this new slate if you think it's time for Eisner to go."

Wondering if he drastically reduced his life expectancy with that statement?

10 posted on 12/01/2003 1:09:57 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Anyone with a sense of morality is being forced of the board.

Hope this has a lot of blowback against Eisner.

11 posted on 12/01/2003 1:14:11 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Again ABCNNBCBS will make sure that the sheeple who watch them, will never hear Roy Disney's side.

Of course the NY Slimes, LA Slimes, Washingto Compost, Boston Globalists, and other left wing fishwraps will never tell Roy's side.

It will be up to us and the conservatives on talk radio to get this ongoing dialoge from Roy out in the open.
12 posted on 12/01/2003 1:17:12 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
We love going to Orlando and NOT paying one red cent to Disney. We stay at the new Ritz, or Universal's Royal Pacific, we only go to non-Disney attractions.

I was accosted by a transvestite Disney employee, taking a survey with a Palm, the last time there. Disgusting.

13 posted on 12/01/2003 1:31:14 PM PST by Jonathan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Of course the NY Slimes, LA Slimes, Washingto Compost, Boston Globalists, and other left wing fishwraps will never tell Roy's side.

Actually this was front-page news in the LA Times this morning, and on the inside page continuing the story, they ran Roy's letter in its entirety in a boldface sidebar.

14 posted on 12/01/2003 1:32:24 PM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
Thanks, I am surprised.
15 posted on 12/01/2003 1:38:37 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
This is exactly what my radio newsbreak was just saying (here in Orlando). They said Roy is going to round up key allies and investors to oust Eisner and get back control of Disney...pointing out the same quote you just did. Anything to get Eisner out works for me.
16 posted on 12/01/2003 2:07:50 PM PST by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
that the age-limit rule, instituted last year,

The age limit was set at 72, which is just how old Roy Disney was last year. Gee, what a coincidence. (NOT)
17 posted on 12/01/2003 2:10:21 PM PST by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Gold's resignation comes as Disney's board begins two days of meetings in New York.

More news...

18 posted on 12/01/2003 2:32:33 PM PST by Libloather (No matter the size of the tale, RATS will still be RATS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
It will be up to us and the conservatives on talk radio to get this ongoing dialoge from Roy out in the open.

And tell it we will.

19 posted on 12/01/2003 2:46:34 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Discontent in the House of Mouse.

...With the last living member of the Disney family calling it quits, perhaps the corporate board should consider a name change, since the only semblence of Walt Disney's legacy is found in the productions Walt oversaw himself, and current releases you could count on one hand. Other than that, zilch.

-Regards, T.
20 posted on 12/01/2003 3:23:01 PM PST by T Lady (Who Let the 'RATS Out?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson