Skip to comments.
What We Owe to NAFTA
WND.com ^
| 12-01-03
| Buchanan, Patrick J.
Posted on 12/01/2003 6:09:02 AM PST by Theodore R.
What we owe to NAFTA
Posted: December 1, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Around Oct. 6, 38-year-old auto mechanic Jeff Cook decided to treat his wife and two daughters to dinner at Chi-Chi's in Beaver Valley Mall outside Pittsburgh. Within three weeks, Cook, suffering from acute liver failure, was fighting for his life.
To save him, surgeons had a new liver flown in. They failed. Jeff Cook became, writes Lydia Polgreen of the New York Times, "the first person to die in what federal health officials say is the biggest food-borne outbreak of hepatitis A in the United States."
Cook would not be the last. Since his death, two more Americans have died and 600 have been infected in Tennessee, Ohio, North Carolina and Georgia, as well as Pennsylvania.
The cause of the hepatitis? According to the Centers for Disease Control, "hepatitis A is spread from person to person by putting something in the mouth that has been contaminated with the stool of a person with hepatitis A. ... The virus is more easily spread in areas where there are poor sanitary conditions or where good personal hygiene is not observed."
As cases were being reported in locations hundreds of miles apart, the root of the outbreak was not some employee at the Beaver Valley Chi-Chi's who failed to wash his hands. The cause turns out to be green onions, trucked into the United States from Mexico. A similar incident occurred in 1996, when 175 Michigan children came down with hepatitis A from the strawberries in their school lunches, which had also been trucked in from Mexico.
On the 10th anniversary of NAFTA's passage, perhaps some of its champions will pause to remember some of its victims.
Open borders and unrestricted immigration the agenda of Wall Street Journal globalists have given us other benefits that ought not to go unnoted on this anniversary.
The recurrence of tuberculosis here in America, where once it had been stamped out, has been traced to mass immigration from Mexico and other Third World countries where TB is pandemic. In 1999, 17,500 new cases were reported.
The West Nile virus was probably introduced when 16,000 foreign birds passed unscreened through JFK airport in 1999. James Fulford, writing on VDARE.com, contends the disease could have had a human carrier from the Middle East, where it apparently originated.
Also writing on VDARE.com, Sam Francis reports on "Chagas disease," which kills 50,000 people a year in Latin America and now, according to the New York Times, threatens the U.S. blood supply.
Mexico is also said to be the primary source of the heroin, cocaine, marijuana and methamphetamine coming in. How does the stuff get in? "Via passenger car and tractor-trailers," according to the Greater Dallas Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Mexican trucks, thanks to NAFTA, are free to roam America's roads.
Another byproduct of open borders is violent crime. In the Los Angeles riot of 1992, worst in our history, thousands of arrestees turned out to be illegal aliens who had joined in the mass looting, pillaging and burning of America's greatest Western city.
The poster boy of open borders has to be Angel Resendez. As author-columnist Michelle Malkin writes, Resendez, for 23 years after his first arrest and deportation, slipped back and forth across the Mexican border, tallying up one of the most horrific rap sheets in U.S. history. From 1997 to 1999, Resendez was a rail-riding serial killer who murdered nine Americans, many of them women he raped as they were dying from his beatings.
Then, there is the economic cost of open borders.
In the Golden State, where one in three illegal aliens from Mexico settles, native-born Californians have begun a mass exodus. During the 1990s, the white population fell for the first time since the gold rush. As middle- and upper-income taxpayers depart, and poor immigrants, legal and illegal, arrive, the burden on social services, from clinics to courts to schools, soars. This is a primary cause of the budget crisis Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected to solve.
But how can it be solved if the tax-consuming poor continue to arrive in huge numbers, while the middle class continues to depart, taking the tax base with it?
According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform, 2.8 million new immigrants, half of them illegal, arrived in the last two years. By 2010, America will be home to 45 million, a nation within a nation.
"A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country any more," said Ronald Reagan. Welcome to Mexiamerica.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: drugs; economy; greenonions; healthhazards; hepatitis; jeffcook; mexiamerica; mexico; nafta; patbuchanan; resendez; schwarzenegger; strawberries
To: Theodore R.
What a stupid argument against NAFTA. People get food poisoning all the time from foods grown domestically. That wouldn't be an argument to import all of our food.
To: SolidSupplySide
Hepatitis is not food poisoning.
TB is not food poisoning.
Chagas disease is not food poisoning.
3
posted on
12/01/2003 6:26:04 AM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
To: SolidSupplySide
He and Perot were both right.
To: Theodore R.
This is a ridiculous combination of factoids to which do not even apply to Nafta in the first place. The author starts with one potentially Nafta related incident. After that all he talks about is illegal activity and open borders. Neither of these is Nafta related.
Come on Pat, is this the best you've got? You used to be able to assemble semi-rational arguments.
5
posted on
12/01/2003 6:45:40 AM PST
by
CMAC51
It never ceases to amaze me how people can ignore the obvious truth of what Pat says to trash him for the way in which he says it.
Screw the USA, first let's get our pound of flesh from Pat! Disease? No problem. Death? No problem. Murders? No problem. Crime? No problem. Open borders? No problem...
Pat is a non-issue today. He's not running for office and never will gain. That's fine by me. Now, let's look at what the man says. Is he right or is he wrong. In this instance he's right. You may not like him. I could care less. What he is referencing should be stopped. Get it?
To: Theodore R.
is this elepahnt a post or a snake or ...? people have gotten sick and died from meat in USDA inspected plants in america in the past five years, so onions from mexico is not a unique food problem. Pat lost the race and screams loud in order to keep getting those fat TV checks. his time passed. get a job.
7
posted on
12/01/2003 8:16:47 AM PST
by
q_an_a
To: DoughtyOne; Theodore R.
It's good to see another informative analysis by Pat. Thanks for posting this.
8
posted on
12/01/2003 9:33:42 AM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on EFNet: irc.efnet.net port 6667 , /join #conservative)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Re: Sucking sound.
If it is not the NAFTA sucking sound then it is the Bush sucking sound. Office of Trade Representative issued Press Release in November saying jobs grew under Clinton. The job sucking sound according to this happened from Bush policies.
Some claimed NAFTA would contribute to U.S. industrial decline and a giant sucking sound. But after NAFTA was passed in 1993:
--U.S. manufacturing output soared in the 1990s, up 44% in real terms.
--U.S. employment grew over 20 million between 1993 and 2000.
--U.S. manufacturing wages increased dramatically, with real hourly compensation up by 14.4% in the 10 years since NAFTA, more than double the 6.5% increase in the 10 years preceding NAFTA.
--Income gains and tax cuts from NAFTA were worth up to $930 each year for the average U.S. household of four.
http://ustr.gov/regions/whemisphere/ftaa2003/factsheet-myth-nafta_us.pdf
According to this the job sucking sound may be coming from China [one of Bush's most favored trading partners].
9
posted on
12/01/2003 11:29:26 AM PST
by
ex-snook
(Americans need Balanced Trade - we buy from you, you buy from us. No free rides.)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Can you give us the economic statistics to demonstrate this?
Pat Buchanan is one of the biggest morons in America. He has been embarrassingly wrong on just about everything in the past 10 years.
10
posted on
12/03/2003 4:53:50 PM PST
by
Texas_Dawg
(Doom.)
To: Texas_Dawg
...Pat Buchanan is one of the biggest morons in America...
Don't sell yourself short, Hawg.
You're right up at the top of the heap yourself.
To: DoughtyOne
Since it's common knowledge to anyone who ever travels in Mexico that the water and fresh foods are contaminated with human sewage, it seems the importers of this NAFTA food should be held liable. They knew but they didn't care that they were exposing American consumers to all kinds of enteric pathogens.
12
posted on
12/04/2003 6:31:20 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Since it's common knowledge to anyone who ever travels in Mexico that the water and fresh foods are contaminated with human sewage, it seems the importers of this NAFTA food should be held liable. They knew but they didn't care that they were exposing American consumers to all kinds of enteric pathogens. Yeah... and what do you think the liklihood is that people in a free market will buy onions from a source that has sold contaminated onions before? How likely do you think it is that other onion sellers are double and triple checking to make sure they don't make the same mistake and destroy any hopes they have of doing business in the lucrative American market ever again? People die from food poisoning occasionally. Get over it. This has zero to do with NAFTA, but seeing as how Pat Buchanan and the anti-capitalist totalitarians have been wrong on everything since its passage, I can see why he is trying to make some connection here.
13
posted on
12/04/2003 7:19:27 PM PST
by
Texas_Dawg
(Doom.)
To: FITZ
Don't kid yourself, our government knows too. Mexico does not have the statutes protecting their food supply like we do. As the article states, this isn't the first time human fecal matter has contaminated our food supply from Mexico. The evil bastards that supported NAFTA should be put in prision until the flesh rots off their bones.
To: Texas_Dawg
Actually it has a lot to do with NAFTA ---- why food can be cheaper to grow in Mexico and how inspections are not being done even on food coming in from Mexico.
If Mexico had the same standards as the USA, then it wouldn't be cheaper to import the food from there ----- but cheap stuff and dirt poor workers is what NAFTA is about.
15
posted on
12/05/2003 3:26:52 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: Theodore R.
NAFTA'S SMOKING GUN:
WHO DUNNIT AND WHY ?
Can you think of any nation on Earth that would sit idly by and watch its factories and jobs move offshore, and put its own taxpayers out of work? Name one nation on the planet that uses its taxpayer's funds to assist factories to move or expand offshore, and then close operations back in the homeland, and then fire its own workers? There is only one. The United States of America.
Turn the clock back to the early 1970s. Henry Kissinger was flitting around the globe and spending time in the Middle-East. U.S. policy was providing aid and comfort to the various warring enemy factions in the explosive region. OPEC was raising oil prices, and putting a stranglehold on the USA at the gas pump. David Rockefeller at the Chase Manhattan Bank, and the others on Wall Street, lusted to get their hands on the vast sums of surplus petro-dollars held by the oil sheiks. They soon did. That's when the problem began.
Soon the New York bankers were taking in mountains of dollars from the Middle East, and loaning them back out to "Third-world" countries in Latin America. While the international rich elite understood the "art of the deal," the peasant classes in Mexico and Latin America were only one step above the stone age. Ambitious industrial projects failed and the massive debt could not be repaid. Mexico alone defaulted on over $100 billion owed to New York Banks, and the banks were under pressure by the Middle East sheiks who wanted their money back. What to do ?
According to the July 25, 1989 edition of "FINANCIAL WORLD" magazine, meetings to rescue Mexico and get the banks paid, had been held off-and-on in New York since 1987. The investigative article titled, "Sweat Equity" indicates that the most favored scheme was to industrialize Mexico into a low-cost, export-producing giant. The banks would then get a piece of the overall export profits to be paid toward their principal and interest. The unpaid principal balance would be rolled-over each year and whatever could be paid against it credited. Such a system would let Mexico pay the debt painlessly from new income streams. Even better, the banks would be paid! No consideration was given to the devastation this policy would cause to the American worker and middle-class. They were the source to provide the needed wealth from their everyday consumer spending and thus an expendable factor.
This concept was further promoted in the book, "LATIN AMERICA AT A CROSSROADS," which was written and published in August of 1990, by David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission think-tank based in New York and Washington. It was easy to get the book accepted as USA policy because Jimmy Carter, George Bush and Bill Clinton were all members of the elite club. In fact, the Trilateral Commission member list reads like a WHO'S WHO of government and politics. White House insiders are also often members of the Council On Foreign Relations, which is also nurtured by, and serves the same international and New York financial interests.
Shortly after the Trilateral book was published, a momentum developed to implement the scheme in a legalized method. While congress could not sit still for such a transfer of wealth and jobs by official treaty, another idea was developed. To give the scheme a slim chance at all, the power elite called it an "Agreement" which needed only a simple majority of Congress to pass, and could be "Fast Tracked" to avoid the normal scrutiny. To that end, the thousands of pages of the North American Free Trade Agreement were kept secret from the citizens and press until long after it was signed. Lawmakers and the press were instead given a 45 page "Summary" that was upbeat and filled with happy-talk. Most of the lawmakers on Capitol Hill, financial columnists, and economists who support NAFTA have a curious common denominator. They haven't read it!
Once "released" by the Government, the massive two-volume work was priced at $41.00 and only available through the handful of U.S. Government Printing Office outlets. These stores are not a favorite of "Window Shoppers," and only a few hundred beltway insiders even wanted the document. They naturally wouldn't say much against the policy that had been established earlier. A few voices such as Ross Perot, Ralph Nader, Chuck Harder, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Brown, and Rev. Jesse Jackson soon spoke out with concern, but the media was able to filter them out and keep most of them from reaching large audiences.
Ross Perot also soon found it difficult to buy good TV time and he became a target of ridicule for his actions against NAFTA. While the "curtain of silence" fell upon anti-NAFTA voices, a strange round of "Shotgun weddings" took place as big media suddenly got merger-mania. Radio crackled with activity, and Westwood One, the owner of NBC,
Mutual, The Source and Talknet, married New York's Unistar. TV soon pictured romance, and a mega-deal cooking with Bell Atlantic, TCI and Liberty Media was the big story. Word was quietly out in the boardrooms that the USA consumers would soon take a monster hit-in-the-pocket-book over NAFTA, and only the strong media would survive. Providing a futuristic metaphor, "USA TODAY" newspaper even revamped its colorful back weather page this summer to include all of Canada and Mexico, while the outline of the continental USA shrunk.
The biggest USA national media corporations also fell in love with the deal after being promised expansion into Mexico to reach new audiences. New American technology to offer 500 channel cable-TV loomed as another threat to take more domestic audience with shrinking bank accounts away from the big network media players. Soon deals were
cooking in the boardrooms to have more USA media merge, and also take positions in the Mexican press and broadcast industry. The big banks, Wall Street, and the stockmarket loved it!
Remember that NAFTA is not a new invention. The banker/politician combine had quietly created policy years ago to allow the set up of the "Maquilladora Region" as a pilot-program along the US-Mexican border. Soon over 2,200 USA factories moved into that 12 mile strip of Mexico during the period from the late 1980's onward. Much had been learned from the early years of operations, and new procedures using low-skill Mexican peasants had been perfected. Industrial engineers learned new designs for assembly operations, and USA trade magazines now report these techniques ready for the expected thousands of new plants and expanded facilities in Mexico as soon as NAFTA becomes law and expands deep into the Mexican continent. Recent financial and real estate conventions held in Washington with capacity-crowds, have also focused on the massive "get rich" Mexican opportunities to soon be created under NAFTA.
To seal the deal, the Mexican billionaire families put up millions of dollars to assist the Salinas government to buy the best lobbyists in Washington. The list of highly paid Mexican agents reads like an "Alumni Roster" of Capitol Hill. The Clinton administration has also announced that, "The store is open." The White House will hand out necessary goodies to sway the undecided members of Congress. The "Fix" is in!
Left out of the deal are the American people. Nobody can explain to them how it's good for America to have millions of jobs move to Mexico? How can USA workers compete with frightened Mexican peasants making 58 cents or a dollar an hour? Government retraining programs have been exposed as multi-billion-dollar-hoaxes because new high-tech jobs don't exist! Unemployed USA workers with families to feed, and mortgages to pay, can't find replacement jobs at the same pay scale, if at all! A permanent underclass is developing and crime is on the increase. In 1994, government regulations will require heads of welfare families to go back to work. Where will those millions of jobs be found ? The NAFTA scheme to pay back the New York banks makes Charles Keating, (the convicted S & L crook), look like Peter Pan. Willing co-conspirators on Capitol Hill don't personally fear the anticipated financial ruin, as they all are vested with government pensions and "Golden Parachutes." The Middle-Class will be affected. They could be retrained to become docile peasants. The "American Dream" and "Rule of Law" is at risk.
Source:
http://www.forthepeople.org/NAFTA.htm
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson