1 posted on
11/29/2003 9:48:42 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: kattracks
Even if it were true-- why would the terrorists and Baathists target one of their best allies, anyway?
2 posted on
11/29/2003 9:52:14 PM PST by
zipper
(Don't Tread On Me)
To: kattracks
Shiiiiit.
3 posted on
11/29/2003 9:52:32 PM PST by
RLK
To: kattracks; MozartLover; Miss Marple; lysie; Dog; Brad's Gramma; Molly Pitcher; Grampa Dave; ...
It takes real effort not to cut loose with a string of language unbecoming of a lady when I read about this piece of treasonous trash.
4 posted on
11/29/2003 9:55:03 PM PST by
kayak
(The Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is truly Vast! [JohnHuang2])
To: kattracks
KP and latrine duty, were very popular pastimes while hillary was in Iraq. Even the officers volunteered.
5 posted on
11/29/2003 9:55:20 PM PST by
Waco
To: kattracks
Yea...right. Hitlery left the security zone to go in and tell our troops that America's support for what they are doing is fading.
They can try all they want, but Hitlery's dog don't hunt...and try as you may, sugar coat it as you may, a cow paddy is still a cow paddy.
What Bush did was couragous, coming in to the Baghdad airport a few days after the DHL flight was hit, knowing that he is the king prize for the terrorists. Hitlery is nothing more than one of their chief abettors and they are hoping she somehow can get in office so they can continue their actions like they did under her husband.
But like I already said, that do don't hunt.
Jeff
6 posted on
11/29/2003 10:02:46 PM PST by
Jeff Head
To: kattracks
Ah, good old London Times and AFP. They'll have a tiny retraction on the "back pages" in a few days. Then they'll run another front page story about the hildabeast saving the planet from alien space invaders, followed by another tiny retraction a few days after that.
One trick ponies.
8 posted on
11/29/2003 10:07:23 PM PST by
Bonaparte
To: kattracks
Do we have any film footage that confirms that Hitlery was past security perimeters? I have not seen any film footage of her scampering about the neighborhoods of Baghdad shaking hands with the locals. I have only seen the forced photo ops with the troops.
To: kattracks
Maybe the liberal liars can prove their assertion that the Daring Hillary was outside the security perimeter.
They won't, of course. They'll write about it, however, since they're slavering ideological fanatics.
To: kattracks
The terrorists wouldn't go after Hillary anymore than the NVA went after Jane Fonda.
To: kattracks; cardinal4; sweetliberty; Budge; MeeknMing; Eaker; ch53gunner
Un-frikin-believable!!!!
Traitor ![](http://freepers.zill.net/users/nicmarlo_fr/FR/pingl.gif)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Please Freepmail me if you want off/on my Traitor ping.)
16 posted on
11/29/2003 10:23:25 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: kattracks
That woman has only one thing on her mind - herself -
nothing she says or does should surprise us - yrt her blathering mouth never ceases to amaze me - I mean in absolute disbelief for her self serving left wing motives.
Mrs. 'It takes a Pillage' herself.
22 posted on
11/29/2003 10:42:33 PM PST by
LibertyLight
(Grateful for Free Rebublic)
To: kattracks
OF COURSE, IT IS FICTION. The same reason Hillary would be able to do such a thing (even though she didn't) would be the same reason the PLO will never kill Shimon Peres. It's basic you elevate, not decapitate, those who divide and moderate your enemy.
The Secret Service wouldn't let Dubya do such a thing. Also, W wouldn't because it wouldn't only threaten his life, it would put all those who provide security for him in the most extreme danger. It's ridiculous. It's like saying Tokyo Rose walked behind enemy lines, but FDR couldn't. It's a stupid, insane thing to say. Even more so, when it is most definitely a lie.
23 posted on
11/29/2003 10:56:26 PM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only elected democrat in America who isn't committing treason.)
To: kattracks
It would perfectly safe for any Clinton to walk any place in any terrorist sponsoring state. They know who butters their bread and would never touch them.
To: kattracks
But remember Ollie, Hillary said you have to be honest, so she would never lie.
27 posted on
11/29/2003 10:59:59 PM PST by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: kattracks
Maybe this explains why the station that airs Hannity in my neck of the woods was experiencing technical difficulties that amounted to radio silence last Friday.
30 posted on
11/29/2003 11:08:05 PM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only elected democrat in America who isn't committing treason.)
To: kattracks
There is a huge difference between a senator wandering around Baghdad and the President wandering around Baghdad. For one thing, we have only one President and he sets the course for the nation. We have 50 senators. If one wanders off, well, it would be tragic and we'd be P.O.'d but there are 49 more where that one came from and
national policy wouldn't be affected one bit. On the other hand, if we lose our President, the nation is thrown into turmoil.
President Bush would have been extremely reckless to leave the secure facility and go wandering around downtown. He's courageous, but not stupid.
(Note to the trigger happy: I'm not advocating the demise of a senator or implying it wouldn't matter. I'm pointing out the difference in impact between losing a President vice a Senator. Just thought I'd throw a little flame-retardant on...) ![](http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/4/4_6_105.gif)
33 posted on
11/29/2003 11:24:34 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Born in California 1958 - Fled to Washington 2002)
To: kattracks
"Unlike the US president, who never left the main military camp at Baghdad airport during his two-and-a-half hour stay, Clinton left the heavily fortified complex around the palace to go and visit troops." EARTH TO "NEWS" REPORTER...
SHE"S ON THEIR SIDE! WHY WOULD THEY KILL HER?
40 posted on
11/29/2003 11:50:31 PM PST by
Jotmo
("Voon", said the mattress.)
To: kattracks
45 posted on
11/30/2003 12:27:16 AM PST by
RJayneJ
To: kattracks
I wonder if Ollie considered that maybe the military might let Her Heinous out of the security zone in hopes she'd become collateral damage, or something like that...
47 posted on
11/30/2003 1:28:19 AM PST by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: kattracks
Lord,
Shulz has passed on to the Heavenly Peanuts patch.
We don't need a replacement for Pigpen.
Would you, please, Lord, remove the creature running around loose with massive amounts of horse biscuits piled all around IT.
Isn't there some dramatic way You could FLUSH IT from the public stage?
49 posted on
11/30/2003 3:48:03 AM PST by
Quix
(WORK NOW to defeat one personal network friend, relative, associate's liberal idiocy now, warmly)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson