Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEMOCRATS TEMPER PRAISE FOR BUSH VISIT WITH CRITICISM
New York Times ^ | 11/28/2003 | Adam Nagourney

Posted on 11/27/2003 8:58:49 PM PST by ServesURight

Democrats Temper Praise for Bush Visit With Criticism

By ADAM NAGOURNEY

With his Thanksgiving Day excursion to Baghdad, President Bush moved to regain control of an issue that Democrats have increasingly viewed as a political liability, reinforcing his commitment to the war while displaying solidarity with troops his rivals had accused him of neglecting, Democratic officials said yesterday.

The surprise visit stunned and confused his rivals, who struggled — in the midst of Thanksgiving dinner — to balance praise for the president's gesture with renewed criticism of his Iraq policy, which they said would be among his greatest vulnerabilities in next year's election.

"It's nice that he made it over there today, but this visit won't change the fact that those brave men and women should never have been fighting in Iraq in the first place," said Jay Carson, a spokesman for Howard Dean, one of the biggest critics of the war among the nine Democrats vying for the party's presidential nomination.

Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts issued a statement saying that the trip was "the right thing to do for our country." But, he added: "When Thanksgiving is over, I hope the president will take the time to correct his failed policy in Iraq that has placed our soldiers in a shooting gallery."

David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, described the visit as a "daring move and great politics," but added: "I think these kids need more. I'm sure they were buoyed by his coming, but they need more."

The trip came at a time of rising criticism of the president for not attending the funerals of the returning war dead. It also came in the same week that Mr. Bush met with families of 26 soldiers killed in Iraq, and thus appeared to be a concerted effort by the White House to deal with a political problem.

And now, in a single day, Mr. Bush may have managed to supplant what has become the single most problematic image of him in this war: The picture of him swaggering across an aircraft carrier in front of banner reading "Mission Accomplished."

That image, which already has shown up in an advertisement by Mr. Kerry attacking the president, now seems likely to be overtaken by the picture of Mr. Bush, his eyes glistening with tears, addressing cheering troops on Thanksgiving Day. It was a moment fraught with imagery that was certainly a central subject of discussion at Thanksgiving tables.

Even aides to Democratic presidential candidates expressed grudging admiration for the political skills of this White House.

"Those guys can do some pretty smart stuff sometimes," a senior adviser to one of the Democrats said.

Matt Bennett, the communications director for Gen. Wesley K. Clark, said: "We're not going to throw stones at the guy for trying to do a nice thing for the troops. When the president goes and spends time with the troops, that's a good thing."

One of the most prominent Democrats in the field, Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, who helped write the Congressional resolution that led to the war, declined to comment on the trip.

In this context, the Democratic candidates sought to stand with Mr. Bush in his gesture of solidarity, while not letting go of the issue of how he has handled the war since the fall of Baghdad. Chris Lehane, an adviser to General Clark, praised Mr. Bush for the trip, but said, "He also has a responsibility to offer us a real success strategy in Iraq so we can get our troops out of there so they don't have to spend future Thanksgivings in Iraq."

Jano Cabrera, a spokesman for Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, said: "In fairness, visiting with the troops is exactly what a commander in chief should do. That said, we hope that he's also reassuring them that the administration will eventually have a plan to win the peace and bring our troops home soon."

Mr. Bennett expressed skepticism that yesterday's events would remove the issue of the war and Mr. Bush's handling of it from the table next year.

"They made their bed with that `Mission Accomplished' trip, and that's going to be around for a long time," he said. "That's not the last ad you will see with that. I will guarantee you that whoever the nominee is will have that image up."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydems; bush; democrats; handwringers; iraq; thanksgiving; thanksgivingvisit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Jeff Chandler
That has traditionally been the VP's job, although Stainmaster B attended quite a few.

Funerals?? I recall him attending ceremonies (photo ops) .. but not funerals

41 posted on 11/27/2003 10:40:32 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kayak
IIRC that picture had Maureen Dowd absolutely snake fascinated about Dubya's "package". She droned on about that for an editorial that was pretty amusing. I wondered how many single malts she had that day.

DK
42 posted on 11/27/2003 10:53:27 PM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Yitzhak Rabin, King Hussein, King Hassan II, Ron Brown, Richard Nixon, Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, Rep. Barbara Jordan, etc..
43 posted on 11/27/2003 10:54:16 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Yitzhak Rabin, King Hussein, King Hassan II, Ron Brown, Richard Nixon, Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, Rep. Barbara Jordan, etc..

That is different then fallen soldiers ..

And if that is the criteria the left is using, the the left is wrong in their reporting

44 posted on 11/27/2003 11:00:41 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Funerals of US military killed in action - not heads of state and other VIPs

A little off subject, but does anyone remember when Hillary walked into Westminster for Princess Diana's funeral, grinning from ear to ear and waving like she was walking the red carpet at the Academy Awards. Kind of inappropriate behavior, wouldn't you say?
45 posted on 11/27/2003 11:03:19 PM PST by Spotsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
Has anyone found any evidence of a sitting American president attending a private funeral of a soldier killed in action?

I don't recall hearing about any

46 posted on 11/27/2003 11:04:44 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I'm surprised it took 'em this long to start their whining and hand-wringing.

Just wait until tomorrow.

Normally, every politician knows what every other politician is going to do and therefore can prepare responses before the event even takes place.

In this instance, no one knew it was coming, particularly the Dems. So, they are caught off guard, for now. They are not sure what to say.

But, by tomorrow morning the Dim talking points will have been E-mailed and faxed to every living, breathing Dim. You will hear the same criticism from every Dim interviewed.

Funny thing is, we all already KNOW what they are going to say. They are so predictable it is just getting to easy.

47 posted on 11/27/2003 11:06:16 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MPCarr
So all they have is their usual "we support the troops but are against the war" stance

How can any reasonable observer conclude they support the troops?

All you have to do is watch their glee to report another American casualty to see that this is a lie.

It must be terrible to be a liberal. Can you imagine going out to get the newspaper and having your mood for that day depend on whether any American soliders died the day before? ("Damn, no soldiers dead today. I sure hope they kill two of them tomorrow.")

48 posted on 11/28/2003 1:32:39 AM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Democrats are worthless pieces of human scum. Period.
49 posted on 11/28/2003 1:42:57 AM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
These people are simply beside themselves with penis envy!

Of all the hundreds of comments on this story that I've read and heard today, I think yours sums up the Democratic/media (same thing) response most accurately and succinctly. Kudos!

50 posted on 11/28/2003 3:16:12 AM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Qoutes from "The Incredible Shrinking Democraps".

Better to have said, "Great move to bolster our troops' morale!"

Nah, I can't see 'em sayin' it either!

51 posted on 11/28/2003 3:37:31 AM PST by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
On C-SPAN
52 posted on 11/28/2003 3:41:42 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
KEYWORDS FOR THE "LYING LIBERALS"

Are you questioning MY "patriotism"?

This bunch will say and do anything to unseat President Bush. The "lying liberals" have said for the past year to criticize their words and deeds is the same as questioning their "patriotism".

Expect that word to become their "blanket" in which they take "cover" for everything they do.
53 posted on 11/28/2003 4:21:36 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

54 posted on 11/28/2003 4:39:04 AM PST by RockChucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: basil; NYC GOP Chick
Of course this silly piece was written by a writer for the New York Times.

He's got "WHINE" written all over his face, doesn't he?

This geek is also a regular guest on a local all-news station here, basil. Every time I see him, I just want to slap the TV screen. LOL

55 posted on 11/28/2003 6:37:09 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight

"They made their bed with that `Mission Accomplished' trip, and that's going to be around for a long time," he said. "That's not the last ad you will see with that. I will guarantee you that whoever the nominee is will have that image up."

Yeah, and next year President Bush's "mission accomplished" will be a free Iraq with a democratically elected governement, while the Democrats' would be Saddam still in power. I like Bush's position better.

56 posted on 11/28/2003 6:49:41 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
This is a made-up issue and I'm sick of the Dems stating it. From a practical standpoint, the President could not attend all of these funerals and it's probably part of the reason that they don't. I know of no military people or their families who have ever expected the President to attend their own or their loved ones funeral should they have to make the supreme sacrifice. This is simply ridiculous and purely politically motivated!
57 posted on 11/28/2003 7:14:16 AM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
The Whiney-Nine strikes again!
58 posted on 11/28/2003 7:21:01 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Actually, he looks fairly constipated. On which all-news station is this aspiring metrosexual?
59 posted on 11/28/2003 8:37:14 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (Don't count your Hatches before they've chickened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
NY1. That insufferable show where a bunch of NY Times writes have a roundtable every week. Bob Herbert's one of them too.
60 posted on 11/28/2003 8:39:26 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson