[My2Cents]

As with abortion, the slippery slope into perversion is being pursued through the courts. This is the #1 reason to re-elect Pres. Bush next year, and to send a large number of newly elected Republican Senators to Washington -- to remake the judiciary.

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[Protagoras]

Or the Supreme Court endorsing sodomy?

That didn't happen. Credibilty went out the window early.

[Centurion2000]

bump

[EdReform]

Bump & Ping

[oust the louse]

Boy,when put on paper like that to see and think deeper about it...it makes you really disgusted...I hope.

I sure hope we have enough sense to get our Judiciary in that we need to uphold some sanity in this wacked out version we call society.Otherwise the future looks bleak from a morality standpoint for my children and thiers as well.I wonder what my Grandma and Grandpa would be thinking now if they were alive?

[weegee]

A friend who works for a university told me that a male employee took a leave of absence to change his sex. When he/she returned, complete with panty hose and makeup, the issue of bathroom usage came up. The men didn't want him/her in their bathroom, and he/she didn't want to use it either. The women didn't want someone they had known as a man to use their bathroom. In a typical case of official wimping out, the university built him/her an exclusive bathroom.

That's not all. Transvestites are lumped together with transexuals as members of transgender identity (crisis, the forgotten word).

If that man never had the sex change but simply wore women's clothes he would still be able to argue for use of the bathroom that meets the sexual identity of his chosen fetish. We are born naked, there is no genetic component to wearing clothes of the opposite sex. It is fashion and nothing else.

Extending the argument, he could still argue for use of the women's facilities if all he wore were panties and a bra or pantyhose under his street clothes. He might not even need to wear such clothes if his mental "identity" was that of a female.

[EagleMamaMT]

Read later.

[WhatNot]

bump

[scripter]

You've probably read that the newly ordained homosexual Episcopal bishop is named simply Gene Robinson, or perhaps even V. Gene Robinson, one of those people who use an initial followed by a middle name. Few media sources mentioned that his first name is Vicky. That's right, Vicky, a name Baby Names website identifies as exclusively for females, sometimes short for Victoria. Why did they hide that fact? The media are rabidly pro-perversion and didn't want to feminize the homosexual bishop in any way.

That little known fact is something I don't remember reading before.

[Eala]

Tangential relevance ping. (First day in almost two weeks I've had the "leisure" to scroll past the first page of postings...)

[viaveritasvita]

Testing new software. Sending this post to myself to see if it shows up in my comments (according to my reading of JohnRob's thread about FR changes, it won't show).

<><

[viaveritasvita]

Sorry-to-clog-up-vladog's-mycomments-section-but-read-later bump.

<><

[winker]

The perversion so rampant in America stemms from our Failure of Our Church Leaders to stand up for Jehovah Gira. For fear of offending "Fat Cats" in the Brotherhood they leave the vast majority of this Country totally un-churched. Where are the Billy Grahams, Falwells and the Robertsons? Even James Robison has gone soft; he used to be a firebrand and totally fearless for Jesus Christ now he promotes vitamin supplements and a watered down Gospel like all the others who remain silent. These are the very ones we need to forcefully attack the liberals and Preach A Lot Of Jesus to our leaders but they remain strangely silent. We are forced to fight a rear guard action to demand a change that should be coming from on High!

[vladog]

OK, I didn't post a comment when I posted the article. Here is the way I feel about. Any sort of homosexual act is wrong and no law or rule from any court can make it right.

Now before someone thinks I'm a frothing at the mouth religious type, I'm not even a Christian or a member of any organized religion. I just know that the perversion that they call homosexual love is wrong and so do the people who are in these relationships, no matter how much they lie about it.

[Scenic Sounds]

This is about the greatest reordering of society in history, and few people of prominence are asking whether it's the right path to follow. Once America goes down that path, that part of society's destiny is locked in forever. We can't turn back.

Why can't we turn back if we decide to? All of these changes are just experimental, it seems to me.

[tm22721]

We are indoctrinated by, and defer to, the female-dominated HR department (trained by Marxist university professors).

Corporatism is destroying America.

BUMP

[ladyinred]

. Great, now we're considering fruity guys for president. Great isn't it? And just a few years ago, the left tried to smear Bush 41 by calling him a wimp every time they had a chance!

[Gritty]

This isn't about privacy. This is about Americans being forced to endorse (or pretend to endorse) every sexual perversion possible.

BTTT

[2nd Amendment]

Very good post. The gist of the information is absolutely true. Of course the Supreme Court didn't outright endorse sodomy. They don't do it that way. They "protected" what sodomites do in private. I believe some members of this Supreme Court will have a special place in hell for the destruction of Godly values they have wrought on America. Justices like Souter and O'conner are a disgrace to anyone who believes in Judeo-Christian values.