Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rockefeller Resignation Urged by Website
Talon News ^ | 11/18/2003 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 11/18/2003 6:55:47 AM PST by Jeff Gannon

WASHINGTON (Talon News) -- The Free Republic Network launched a website on Monday that will focus on the scandal surrounding the Senate Intelligence Committee memo which detailed a Democrat plan to use classified information to defeat President Bush in 2004.

The website, www.intelmemo.com, will provide news, analysis, and research material about the memo written by a staffer for Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV). The memo scandal was first revealed by nationally syndicated radio talk show host Sean Hannity.

(Excerpt) Read more at talonnews.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Extended News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004memo; freerepublic; frn; intelcommittee; memogate; resignation; rockefeller; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Jeff Gannon
BTTT Morning CyberCowboy! Pings please :)
21 posted on 11/18/2003 8:37:08 AM PST by Libertina ("We're not establishing intimacy with these people, we want to crush them." Rush on rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
By hook or by crook we must drag the Pubbie leadership into the battle field! This cannot stand!

BUMP!

22 posted on 11/18/2003 8:37:11 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; CyberCowboy777
Ping!
23 posted on 11/18/2003 8:41:35 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; traveler; Travimoto
By hook or by crook we must drag the Pubbie leadership into the battle field! This cannot stand!
24 posted on 11/18/2003 9:04:37 AM PST by Libertina ("We're not establishing intimacy with these people, we want to crush them." Rush on rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
bump
25 posted on 11/18/2003 9:32:16 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
bump
26 posted on 11/18/2003 9:32:22 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Thanks GOPj!
27 posted on 11/18/2003 9:33:25 AM PST by Libertina ("We're not establishing intimacy with these people, we want to crush them." Rush on rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gannon
I hate to say this, but I've read that memo through three times, and I can't find anywhere in it that it says they're going to use classified information for their nefarious ends.

It mentions "public statements" and "de-classified materials", but nowhere does it say "We can use the secret information that we get from the CIA to bash the GOP" or anything similar.

What's the big deal, or are we getting our knickers in a wad over nothing?
28 posted on 11/18/2003 9:45:03 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; Xthe17th; mountaineer; WVNan
For your review and action...
29 posted on 11/18/2003 10:08:44 AM PST by sauropod ("Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
However, one thing you need to keep in mind: The substance of the Committee's work is classified until released... Basically, they want to "release" classified stuff for partisan political uses.

Nuff said?
30 posted on 11/18/2003 11:19:10 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Bttt...
31 posted on 11/18/2003 11:59:56 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Democrats 2546 (43.87%)
Republicans 2922 (50.35%)
Libertarians 59 (1.02%)
Greens 155 (2.67%)
None of the Above
121 (2.09%)
32 posted on 11/18/2003 12:06:51 PM PST by KalDot (The "left" are in very desperate days.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KalDot
Thanks, KalDot!
33 posted on 11/18/2003 12:09:11 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gannon

Which party can be trusted with America's national security?

Democrats 2549 (43.50%)
Republicans 2975 (50.77%)
Libertarians 59 (1.01%)
Greens 155 (2.65%)
None of the Above
122 (2.08%)

5860 votes

34 posted on 11/18/2003 2:46:32 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gannon
BEST OF THE WEB TODAY, BY JAMES TARANTO, November 18, 2003

Rocky Fesses Up

When Fox News reported two weeks ago on a leaked memo outlining the Democrats' strategy to use the Senate Intelligence Committee for political gain, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the committee's ranking Democrat, seemed to disclaim responsibility: "The draft memo was not approved nor was it shared with any member of the Senate Intelligence Committee or anyone else. It was likely taken from a waste basket or through unauthorized computer access."

Now, however, he's changing his tune. In an op-ed in today's Washington Post, he seems to acknowledge that staffers drafted the memo at his direction:

"Faced with Republicans' continuing refusal to conduct a complete investigation into these matters, my staff recently drafted an options memo on the use or potential misuse of intelligence. The memo, intended only for me, was pilfered from the usually secure Senate intelligence committee and distributed to the media. It has become a convenient excuse for Republicans to shut down the committee and curtail the investigation."

It's more than a "convenient excuse," of course. The committee's raison d'être is honest oversight; if the Dems are determined to transform it into a partisan club, it may as well shut down.

35 posted on 11/18/2003 3:15:23 PM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"Faced with Republicans' continuing refusal to conduct a complete investigation into these matters

Translation, The republicans refuse to blame Bush.
36 posted on 11/18/2003 9:09:48 PM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Bttt
37 posted on 11/19/2003 7:54:57 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gannon
I agree completely. He should resign.
38 posted on 11/25/2003 6:28:22 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gannon
Sheets Byrd has been and is protected by the RATS and special interest groups for so long that he has become an institution and disloding him appears insurmountable except by death. Hopefully, RAT Rockefeller won't be given the same protection and perk, and he will be dislodged. Good idea about this website!
39 posted on 11/28/2003 10:42:55 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
LOL!
40 posted on 11/28/2003 4:33:58 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson