Posted on 11/12/2003 4:38:02 PM PST by SJackson
And now, the 2003 Nutritional Villain of the Year is - may I have a drum roll, please! - bread.
That's right, folks, the staff of life turns out to be a stake through your heart, if you read the latest reports. Bread makes you fat, they say.
Bread-phobia appears to be almost entirely due to the Atkins diet and all its low or no-carb permutations that have recently swept the country. The basic idea is that if you eat only meat, dairy products and vegetables you'll feel full and lose weight.
Bread sales across the country are falling like punched-down dough as chubby consumers shy away from carbohydrates. I heard all about this for the second or third time on a radio program on the way to work the other day. They were interviewing bakers who were wondering what to do to revive sales. Maybe they need a bread check-off.
Studies and anecdotal experience show that the Atkins diet works, at least in the short term. Close to home, both my parents lost weight in the first year. In recent months they haven't.
One veterinarian I chatted with about the diet wondered what happens to people's livers when they're on the Atkins diet for long periods of time. He knows what happens to cows that eat too much protein and not enough roughage.
Wasn't it just a few years ago that bread was the culinary darling du jour? But as with so many other foods, fame has proven to be treacherous. Look what happened to eggs, butter, chocolate and red meat. Two or three decades ago the once-beloved egg was suddenly renamed as the great villain, a nasty little thing that raised your cholesterol and gave you heart attacks.
Then real butter came under attack, and we were all supposed to eat margarine. Dairy products in general, once a cornerstone of the nutriiton pyramid, were suddenly discovered to be fattening and bad for you. So much for my childhood instructions to "drink lots of milk for strong bones."
The next victim was red meat. I don't remember exactly what the reasoning was behind that vilification, but we were to substitute with chicken and fish. Chocolate got a nutritional hatchet job for being fattening, probably because we love it so much. But that was then.
Now eggs are OK to eat again, since they're wonderfully complete nutritional packages. Cholesterol evidently has more to do with your genetic inheritance than your diet, though diet is still important for those who need to bring their levels under control.
Butter has been found to be better for your blood vessels than margarine, and red meat is great for adding vitamins and minerals to your diet, especially iron. Chocolate is a mood elevator and teeth protector. I knew all along it made me feel better; now many experts agree.
In the past two years many nutritionists have restored dairy products to a place of honor as the best source of calcium for a calcium defiecient nation. Several recent large studies have also shown that dairy is an aid to weight loss. The calcium and perhaps other components in dairy products have the effect of speeding up the metabolism, so you burn calories faster.
In the 1973 movie "Sleeper," actor Woody Allen played a vegetarian California health-food store owner who is cryogenically frozen and then thawed out 200 years later.
After he's properly re-warmed, his hosts offer him - to his horror - a healthy meal of steak and brownies to restore him to good health.
The scene was hilarious then; now it's spooky because it's coming true.
Of course, not all nutritional experts agree that eggs, meat, milk and butter are good guys again, but the tide has certainly turned.
I have great hopes that in a few years this smear campaign against bread will blow over and carbohydrates will be restored to their proper place in the national diet.
Before nutrition became a polticial issue, grade school students, myself included, were taught a pretty simple, user-friendly program for staying healthy and slim. The gist of it was that everyone should eat three moderate - moederate is a key concept, here - well-balanced meals each day.
Well-balanced meant a combination of meat and dairy, fruits and vegetables, and breads and starches. It did not mean a continuous intake of nutritionally worthless, high-calorie pop, chips and candy.
We were a slimmer nation back then.
Maybe it's not so much what you eat, but how much, and how much you exercise. Not a revolutionary thought, exactly, but one that might be usefully revived from the dustbin of nutritional history.
Ann Hansen covers news in west-central Wisconsin and is the small acreage section editor for The Country Today. She may be reached at shansen@bloomer.net.
Yeah stuff that should go in the toilet. It is a bunch of $#!T
The game is over. The food pyramid is DEAD. The American Dietetic Association is a complete joke. It is manifest. People aren't supposed to eat that trash.
Do a search on low carb on google with any of the issues raised in your "research". I don't have time to argue each and every fact. I will just say most of the research you have listed is flawed and a little research on your part will prove it.
If you want to eat like a cow continue on. Otherwise READ. I fell for the tripe for years. Thank God my wife brought home Protein Power 7 years ago. It allowed me to look at the other side.
I lost 46 pounds, mostly due to Atkins (from 230 to 184, for a 5'10" male). It works, if you stick to it for several weeks. I lost 6, 1, 8, 3, 3, and 2 pounds in my first 6 weeks, and 1-2 per week for a month after that.
Exactly how often do you see a person who is 50+ pounds overweight in an extended energy draw?!? I didn't start running or working out again until after I lost 25.
If you'd bother to read the Atkins book, you'd see that the whole program is set up to INCREASE carb intake after the "induction" phase to find the level at which you maintain a steady weight. Once I'd lost that 25, and started exercising again, I was back up to about 70g of carbs per day, which is more than adequate for a regular 30-minute workout every other day. Once again, just about every nay-sayer has no clue what the Atkins diet is really about.
Yeah, the health effects of Atkins are FAR worse than the health effects of being 50 pounds overweight! ROFL!!
Eat whole grains for carbs, reduce the following as much as possible: fats, sugars, salt, caffeine and alcohol AND exercise regularly. You will lead a longer and happier life.
Atkins diets and all other fads prey upon the weak and gullible.
Stick with the basics.
/didactics
This is simply reverse hysteria. Bread is not inherently unhealthy. It has to do more with our ability, or current lack thereof, to burn the carbohydrates that bread represents.
Bread became the staff of life when people had very high energy demands and little to eat to fund them. In that regard bread functions as its historic name implies. Our current lack of muscle mass and sedentary lifestyles simply preclude the quantities of bread the we consume. That is the problem. We cannot eat the quantities of bread we consume without a lot more exertion on a regular basis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.