Posted on 11/11/2003 1:29:40 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
In time for Veterans Day and the release of former Army Pfc. Jessica Lynch's autobiography, a military reform group is calling on President Bush to revise "Clinton-era rules" it says unnecessarily expose servicewomen to greater risk. The Center for Military Readiness, in a position paper published on its Web site, says new details about the sexually abusive treatment of Lynch by her Iraqi captors should be enough to spur lawmakers into ensuring military women in the future are better protected and shielded from combat roles. "We need brave women in the military, but no one's daughter should have to suffer an ordeal comparable to that experienced by the 19-year-old Lynch — not in the name of women's careers, men's resentment, military necessity, or anything else," said a statement by the center. In an effort to prompt changes, the center has initiated a petition drive (www.americansforthemilitary.com) directed at President Bush, asking him to order civilian and uniformed military officials to allow "female soldiers to serve their country without deliberate exposure to greater, unequal risk." The petition, which the center said Tuesday has already garnered more than 18,000 signatures, is also being supported by 15 other groups, according to a statement. Elaine Donnelly, the center's president, told NewsMax the changes recommended in the petition should be implemented before the next major U.S. military engagement. "We felt the changes were necessary before the war in Iraq, but it wasn't appropriate" to suggest them while American forces were in harm's way, Donnelly said. Specifically, the petition calls on the president to: "Find a way to allow military women, especially those in support units, to serve without undue exposure to 'a substantial risk of capture' in or near close combat units, to the greatest degree possible. "Restore single-gender basic training in the Army, which experts have recognized as a more efficient and militarily effective format for male and female trainees alike. "Review and revise well-meaning but problematic pregnancy and family policies that hurt readiness by increasing single parenthood, and poverty in the military, as well as the incidence of long-term separations of young children from single or dual-service parents. "Revoke perceived pressures for gender-based recruiting goals and quotas, which unnecessarily burden recruiters and increase the cost of maintaining a strong and ready All-Volunteer Force." Jessica's Ordeal Lynch's unit, the 507th Maintenance Ordnance Company, fell under Iraqi attack near Nasiriyah on March 23. In the ensuing battle, 11 fellow soldiers would die, and Iraqi troops took Lynch prisoner. Though U.S. special forces rescued her from an Iraqi hospital April 1, according to her autobiography she was first raped and sodomized by her Iraqi captors. The claim of sexual assault is disputed by Iraqi doctors, who said they saw no evidence of it while Lynch was in their custody. Nevertheless, Donnelly says Lynch's ordeal justifies the petition. "You've got contradicting stories, but ... one does not preclude the other." Keeping women out of harm's way is the issue, she told NewsMax. Privacy vs. Military's Needs Citing the secrecy surrounding Lynch's alleged sexual abuse, Donnelly said the military had created a "dichotomy" for itself: protecting a woman's right to privacy at the risk of undermining the chain of command. "What I see as an emerging controversy ... is this issue of confidentiality," Donnelly said. "You can't have it both ways. You can't say we're sending women into units known to involve a high risk of capture [and ensuing abuse] and then say if anything bad happens, it falls under confidentiality rules." Donnelly said it didn't matter "if it happens at the Air Force Academy or at the hands of the enemy," protecting confidentiality of the victim at the risk of keeping commanders "in the dark" undermined command and placed women in an unfair advantage over men. "Sometimes due process goes out the window once you're accused," she said. "But if commanders are expected to be responsible for what happens, then confidentiality isn't consistent with that." Clintonoid Rules The center said the Clinton administration implemented the rules of engagement for women that placed Lynch and other female military personnel in harm's way in Iraq. "In 1994, Bill Clinton's Secretary of Defense Les Aspin announced new personnel assignment regulations that were billed as expanded 'career opportunities' for women," said the center, in its position paper. "Female enlistees, including Lynch and former prisoner of war Spec. Shoshana Johnson, clearly were not aware that the rules had changed. No one told them, it seems, that women would be assigned to previously all-male units, even in support missions known to involve a 'substantial risk of capture.'" "These Clinton-era rules remain in effect today," said the center. Johnson and Lynch, members of the same unit, were captured together March 23. "Without further delay, President George W. Bush should direct Pentagon officials to find a way for female soldiers to serve their country without deliberate exposure to greater, unequal risk," the center said. Larry Flynt Thinks He's Cute Adding to the controversy over Lynch, Bush-hating Democrat pornographer Larry Flynt reaped a bonanza of media attention for himself Tuesday by claiming he bought nude photos of her last month to publish in Hustler magazine. He claimed he decided not to publish the pictures because Lynch was "a victim of the Bush administration." The photos supposedly show the undressed Army supply clerk posing with male soldiers. "Jessica Lynch is a good kid, she's not a hypocrite or out to fool anyone," according a statement from Flynt. "She's just a victim of the Bush administration, who is using her to justify the war in Iraq and force-feed us a Joan of Arc." Lynch has declined to comment. Her attorney, Stephen Goodwin, said in a statement: "It's incredulous [sic] that anyone would think it appropriate in any way to attempt to publish unauthorized photos of Jessica - photos taken before she was deployed to Iraq and before her capture and rescue."
UNEQUAL risk?? B.S. No matter how you feel about Muslims in general or the Iraqi army in particular, they have not been deliberately targeting woman: they target EVERYONE, pretty much equally and with equal malice.
Women who are shot in combat are no less dead or wounded than men.
I don't believe women shouls be put into regular combat situations. I never have. But the "unequal risk" argument does not wash and this "women's group" has not made a convincing case for some shadowy form of cheuvanism.
In fact, the only argument which makes the case to keep women out of combat IS what feminazis consider a cheuvanistic one. I'm a woman, BTW. I'm perfectly capable of killing or dying for my fellows or my country, but will NEVER agree with voluntarily sticking an extra distraction (WOMEN) into a d@mned battle! The EXCEPTIONS do NOT justify (current military) rules!
Yep.
Hmmm...interesting idea. Heck, bringing back the WACs and WAVSs would help...but be considered "sexist"
My recollection from Gulf War I was 100% of the women taken captive were raped and 0% of the men. I haven't seen any results from studies of Gulf War II yet.
Oh, right, social conservatism is never about the person doing the complaining - its about making choices for other people because the complainer has such a better lifestyle planned for the people they seek to bar from an activity.
Confusing the roles involved can only serve to undermine morale. For over a thousand years, a sense that War--when necessary--is a male duty, has brought out the best in young men; it is the Chivalric ethic. Clinton tried in a number of ways to undermine military morale, and this is the most obvious.
William Flax
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.