Skip to comments.
Europeans Outlaw Net Hate Speech
Wired News ^
| Nov. 09, 2002
| By Julia Scheeres
Posted on 11/10/2003 7:55:07 AM PST by Dallas59
Edited on 06/29/2004 7:10:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Council of Europe has adopted a measure that would criminalize Internet hate speech, including hyperlinks to pages that contain offensive content.
Specifically, the amendment bans "any written material, any image or any other representation of ideas or theories, which advocates, promotes or incites hatred, discrimination or violence, against any individual or group of individuals, based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, as well as religion if used as pretext for any of these factors."
(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; antisemites; antisemitism; bigbrother; censors; censorship; eu; europe; europeanunion; firstammendment; freespeech; hatespeech; internet; nazis; net; pc; politicallycorrect; pufflist; racialdivision; racism; religion; religiousintolerance; thoughtcrime; thoughtpolice; worldwideweb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Dallas59
I wonder if these prohibitions will extend to desperate Europeans trying to "out" Islam and reverse their oncoming calamity?
21
posted on
11/10/2003 8:38:44 AM PST
by
Gritty
To: Dallas59; *puff_list; Just another Joe; SheLion; Max McGarrity; Flurry; CSM; Great Dane; metesky; ..
Council of Europe has adopted a measure that would criminalize Internet hate speech, including hyperlinks to pages that contain offensive content. The antis claim sites like FORCES, etc contain offensive material because FORCES pinpoints the offensive content of the antis sites.
It also obliquely refers to the Holocaust, outlawing sites that deny, minimize, approve or justify crimes against humanity, particularly those that occurred during World War II.
Wonderful, so now we are guilty of hate speech when we try to remind people that Hitler was very anti-smoker and anti-smoking and used that to discriminate against people based upon sex and ethnic origin. Or will the antis be guilty of the hate speech when they refer to us as being as bad as the nazis because SHS kills so many...........?
22
posted on
11/10/2003 8:43:53 AM PST
by
Gabz
(Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
To: Republic If You Can Keep It
A chill down my spine? Yes.
Here's something from one of my favorite authors ...
It is not very inspiring to fight for the freedom of the purveyors of pornography or their customers. But in the transition to statism, every infringement of human rights has begun with the suppression of a given right's least attractive practitioners. In this case, the disgusting nature of the offenders makes it a good test of one's loyalty to a principle. -- Ayn Rand
To: Dallas59
bump
To: Dallas59
How long before they declare the FR a hate site?
Will OConnor give deference to the EU law over the US Consititution. The notion that is said she would consider it is offensive. Occonnor and Ginsberg have similar concepts on this issue.
They can't win in the market place of ideas, so they now close the market.
To: RiflemanSharpe
Will the french surrender monkeys bank boycotfrance web sites as a guise for hate speech?
There is no first amendment in the EU. There is not second amendment in the EU. Heck, there is no THIRD amendment in the EU. and so on.
To: RiflemanSharpe
"I hate the french surrender monkeys"
Get it right. It's "cheese-eating surrender monkeys". And don't forget it. ;)
For a very amusing read, go to a google search engine and type "French military victories", then hit the "I'm feeling lucky" button. Follow the link from there.
Qwinn
27
posted on
11/10/2003 9:09:15 AM PST
by
Qwinn
To: Dallas59
When will the Euro tools realize that you can't regulate thought by regulating speech?
To: AppyPappy
It's the same as not being able to have the Ten Commandments in the courthouse in Alabama, but they can put the Koran on display during Ramadan in the police station in NYC. Figure that one out.
To: Dallas59
Excellent! Now, if they can pass a law against "bad vibes" and being annoyed, my day would go much better.
Oh, and pass a law against traffic jams, too. And babies crying. And puppies needing to be house broken.
My daughter is sick today. They need to outlaw the flu, as well.
30
posted on
11/10/2003 9:15:14 AM PST
by
Skooz
(All Hail the Mighty Kansas City Chiefs: 9-0 baby)
To: Bikers4Bush
They are and they do. Quite effectivly. There is no fox or conservative media as we know it in the EU zone. The cross EU news is only Euronews TV, CNNeurope, and BBC. All with more leftism that makes CNN USA look anti-clinton. Positive stories for the USA are verboten unless it is a positive story about an american's funeral or homosexuals in the USA.
They still teach history of 1776 as if the USA is just a breakaway thirteen disperate colonies. They do not, contrary to popular myth, know who the USA works. Also contrary to popular myth, not all students in european k -high school are rocket scientists.
In fact in some countries, being on the internet is still expensive because your LANDLINE is paid by the MINUTE like a cell phone. It keeps the internet out of practical reach of many. It is also hard to buy a computer for communicating ideas when you only make 300-400 euro's a MONTH. (before expenses)
European nations will forever surpress free speech because it works.
To: Alas Babylon!
You are exactly right. I can't imagine that the thought police in Europe are trying to shut any speech it doesn't like in the face of the US Constitution. I guess I'm kind of like you. We are the unwashed so what do we know? Quite frankly I would like to see them try! Especially here!
To: Sunshine Sister
With all the hate groups that abound in the EU for one reason or another. (they make US groups look like romper room) It seems like this is directed at anti-EU and anti-Euro currency speech.
Hmmmm, what are they hiding? can you say another eurostat scandal? (there have be two so far. It would be as if Greenspan was caught with three sets of financial books and a hotline to his brokers in NY.)
To: Dallas59
Hmmm. So if you called for a boycott against the French for example, this would be illegal. If you had a website that linked to FR this would be illegal. If you published a blog that said "The Israelis should crack down on the Palestinians" this would be illegal. If you had a website that supported your country going to war against another country...
To: AppyPappy
"Will they go after Muslim anti-semite sites? Nope"
The Euro-weenies think that they can avoid terrorism by appeasing the elements of radical Islam. Appeasement didn't work with Hitler, and it won't work with the Muslim Islamo-facists either!
To: Gabz
Thank God for the Bill O'Rights, eh?
Come and get me Euro-swine!
36
posted on
11/10/2003 10:26:14 AM PST
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: Dallas59
including hyperlinks to pages that contain offensive content.Does that mean they will outlaw A.S.H.
37
posted on
11/10/2003 11:57:32 AM PST
by
Great Dane
(You can smoke just about everywhere in Denmark.)
To: Dallas59
Well I hate the EU Nazis with a passion!
I can't wait for the Muslims to completely take over Europe. I never though I'd say it, but a Muslim take over might be an improvement for Europe.
38
posted on
11/10/2003 12:03:51 PM PST
by
vladog
To: Dallas59
This is the break point... the reason the 1st Amendment comes first.
Once the bad guys succeed in criminalizing dissent, the chance to work for freedom within the system is over.
To: Dallas59
40
posted on
11/10/2003 4:03:14 PM PST
by
weegee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson