Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/06/2003 2:43:18 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: nickcarraway
Primate Peter Carnley

So, on his view, he was for two weeks neither human nor primate, then for a span of years a human primate, and finally, at long last, a Primate.

2 posted on 11/06/2003 2:52:11 PM PST by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
a genetically novel kind of cell

I get all tingly when they use this complicated, super-scientific and really-really-precise terminology.

3 posted on 11/06/2003 2:54:09 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
This is part of the new Anglican approach of adopting and accepting pop culture. The purpose of this pronouncement is shown in the last couple of lines... fertility treatments and stem cell research. According to the Anglicans, go ahead as long as you do it within the first 14 days.

Why are people so dead set on playing God? A cell, freshly fertilized, is no less a potential adult than an embryo. The real question is "at what point have we humans done our part and it's time to let God take it from there?"

The answer is conception.

All we can do after that is choose to allow God's plan to unfold or abort it in process. All of this other parsing and nitpicking is meant to serve a purpose and ideology--it's not a careful and prayerful pursuit of truth.
4 posted on 11/06/2003 2:58:35 PM PST by pgyanke ("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
he fertilised egg must also pass the point that it could split to become an identical twin, which was at about 14 days.

If it splits into twins do they have to wait another 14 days?

(I know, I know. He's talking about the number of cells, rather than a literal time period.)

5 posted on 11/06/2003 3:02:02 PM PST by syriacus (Casual comments about tubes, made after watching a 3 handkerchief movie, do not justify euthanasia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Oh, implantation. Sounds like as good a reason as any other.
6 posted on 11/06/2003 3:03:29 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Well, I for one am glad we've finally gotten this whole thing figured out.
7 posted on 11/06/2003 3:04:29 PM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"If conception was defined as the meeting of gametes - egg and sperm - then the cloned sheep Dolly was not conceived, because Dolly was the product of cell nuclear transfer, where the ovum nucleus was replaced by DNA from an adult cell."

Has anyone argued that Dolly -was- conceived? Anyone? Bueller?

Qwinn


8 posted on 11/06/2003 3:10:29 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"LIFE STARTS AT THE BEGINNING." -Cindy

LIFE!
http://www.truthusa.com/cindy.html#LIFE
9 posted on 11/06/2003 3:11:17 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Up until the 14th day it certainly isn't death.

In any case, I'm willing to compromise on the time for a legal abortion being between the 1st and the 13th days of life.

I'm afraid, though, that we're going to have to start by getting the 9th month ruled off limits to abortions.

And before that we're going to have to start by ruling all courts other than the Supreme Court out of the discussion altogether.
10 posted on 11/06/2003 3:16:14 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
IIRC there are two archbishops in Australia -- Peter Jensen of Sydney, who is orthodox, and Peter Carnley, from Perth, who is not orthodox.

I'm sure you'll all be very surprised to learn that Carnley also supports same-sex unions.

11 posted on 11/06/2003 3:20:55 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Don't worry, I'm sure they will come around to partial birth abortions.
12 posted on 11/06/2003 3:24:08 PM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Archbishop Carnley said that until it was implanted in a womb lining, a fertilised egg was not a human life but rather a genetically novel kind of cell.

So I wonder, is a sperm not human, or is it not alive? I used to think it was both.

16 posted on 11/06/2003 3:36:24 PM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"I am the Immaculate 14-day embryo"
Mary

Yeah, that works < /sarcasm >

O2

19 posted on 11/06/2003 4:08:31 PM PST by omegatoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Well... at least at 14 days some freeky so-called doctor can't ram a pliars into you and then suck your brains out !!!

.

22 posted on 11/06/2003 4:16:17 PM PST by GeekDejure (<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Why, I had absolutely no idea God was on not only Greenwich Mean Time, but that His day had 24 hours.
23 posted on 11/06/2003 4:17:36 PM PST by OpusatFR (The leftwing lies because the truth would kill them all off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Hmm, I think it is after 17 days, 2 hours, 14 minutes
and 3 seconds.
25 posted on 11/06/2003 4:34:15 PM PST by Tac12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Pardon me for being obtuse, but what the heck is the big difference between fertilization and the egg renting a room in the womb?

The big argument today is the partial birth of a child and the murderous act of ramming scissors into its brain.

(It disgusts me to even type that.)

But talk about a "moot point"; fertilization or 14 days after? What am I missing?

27 posted on 11/06/2003 4:47:58 PM PST by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I'll just let my tagline address this one.
30 posted on 11/06/2003 4:52:37 PM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; MHGinTN
I'm not sure how this would add to the discussion but here goes...

Identical twins can differ

Even identical twins can have biological differences. Identical twins do have the same genes but never the same mitochondria (which also contain genetic material). The mitochondria split into two different sets at the very first division of the fertilized egg-before twinning occurs.

36 posted on 11/06/2003 5:24:21 PM PST by syriacus (Casual comments about tubes, made after watching a 3 handkerchief movie, do not justify euthanasia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

More superstitutious nonsense from the Charch of England which likes to try to catch up with the world rather than with the Holy Spirit.

39 posted on 11/06/2003 5:34:14 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson