Impeach Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

The Washington Times ^ | 10-20-03 | Greg Pierce

[auggy]

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor aborts the U.S. Constitution; impeachable offense? In an unprecedented show of arrogance against America and the United States Constitution, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution , Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution as they make their decisions. Disregarding her oath of office that she will uphold the U.S. Constitution seems to be an impeachable offense. In the infamous "Lawrence v. Texas" sodomy case this year, Mrs. O'Connor said the majority on the court used European legal precedent in making their rogue decision. And worse yet, she said that "Over time, we will rely increasingly on international and foreign courts in examining domestic issues." The Christian Coalition of America calls on Congress to begin reining in these arrogant renegade judges, and dealing with Justice O'Connor would be a good place to begin.

[BSunday]

Judicial Outrage Ping

If you want on or off this list, let me know...please....really...it's no trouble at all...

[ItsOurTimeNow]

Mine have simply stopped responding to me.

[auggy]

"Rodger that brother, where there is life, there is hope. "

It is something that definitely needs to be done.

Thank You!

[EdReform]

Bump & Ping

[DLfromthedesert]

You mean that snotty Kennedy kid, and that so-called "Republican" hippie?

[ItsOurTimeNow]

And Langevin, the liberal cripple.

But, yes. Heathens and losers, the whole stinking lot of 'em.

[auggy]

Wow! I wish I had a congresscritter like him. I very rarely get any replies from my representitives. I think alot more of a politician when he replies, and the reply you got was very good. I wonder, if they had written a reply on this subject because they have had so many people writing about O'Connor?

What I gather from his remarks, is the Constitutions Article III states that when the person is a foreigner, the Justices need to consider the laws of his/her country or state. I don't think, from what he states, it means the citizens in our country. In fact, I would bet money, that it does not apply to the citizens of the U.S.A.

I am not a lawyer nor am I versed that much on the constitution, I am basing my opinion on the email you received from Rep. Mark Udall. Sandra Day O'Connor made it crystal clear that the reason for doing this was to make a better impression of the U.S. to the world. Which isn't the reason Article III was written.

Hopefully, they have been bombarded with emails, from people like you and I.

Thanks, for sharing it with us.

[MeekOneGOP]

Impeachment is too good for her ...

[davidosborne]

I heard about this on the way to Fort Jackson this weekend... I immediately called my Congressman (Crenshaw (R-FL-4)) and spoke with his aide who followed up on it and verified exactly what it was that she said.... Now we need to spread the word... Please call YOUR congresscritter and INSIST that action be taken against "Justice" O'Connor...

ANY U.S. Supreme Court Justice who considers "International Law" when rendering decisions is not worthy to hold office in these United States!!!!

FReegards,

David C. Osborne

[BlueNgold]

The frightening part is that she is a 'moderate'. Imagine what RBG must think about this issue???

[davidosborne]

[davidosborne]

Scarry isn't it.... May God Help the United States of America.. !!

[afraidfortherepublic]

Hold on. I do not believe that you can impeach a Supreme Court Justice. They serve for life. Period.

[davidosborne]

Rhe impeachment procedure still applies.. she has outwardly violated her OATH by stating that "international law" has ANY bearing on U.S. Supreme Court decisions period....

[NRA2BFree]

I totally agree with you! She needs to be impeached. Thanks for the information!

[Ravenstar]

David,
On this one you are way behind the curve. Shortly after the Sodomy decision was rendered I contacted Tom Feeney (R- FL 24)and his legislative director about starting impeachment motions in the Judiciary Committee as he is a member of that committee. On calling back I was summarily informed that He will not uphold his oath of office and protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I stated that if the Justices went outside the Constitution for their decisions as they did in the sodomy case, then they were forfeiting their authority, as it comes from that very same Constitution. All he said was,"Very interesting theory you have there!" but Consgressman Feeney still will not submit motions for impeachment of the Supreme Court Justices. They are all traitors against the Constitution! When is everyone going to wake up to this!

Ravenstar

[Ravenstar]

Wrong they are subject to impeachment just the same as any other judge!

Ravenstar

[davidosborne]

This is the CLEAREST example of TREASON that I have ever seen from a Supreme Court Justice.... I think if this got the publicity it deserves we might see some action by our congresscritters... Have you called your rep? What did he/she say? Please let me know.. This is not the last Mr. Crenshaw will hear from me on this issue....

FReegards,

David

[auggy]

"Hold on. I do not believe that you can impeach a Supreme Court Justice. They serve for life. Period. "

You are correct. They serve for life, unless they are impeached.

I believe they can be.