Skip to comments.
Impeach Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
The Washington Times ^
| 10-20-03
| Greg Pierce
Posted on 11/04/2003 4:25:10 PM PST by auggy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: auggy; WillRain; Sweet_Sunflower29
Judicial Outrage Ping
If you want on or off this list, let me know...please....really...it's no trouble at all...
41
posted on
11/05/2003 5:36:35 AM PST
by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: DLfromthedesert
Mine have simply stopped responding to me.
42
posted on
11/05/2003 5:37:53 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: skull stomper
"Rodger that brother, where there is life, there is hope. "It is something that definitely needs to be done.
Thank You!
43
posted on
11/05/2003 5:42:17 AM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: auggy; Grampa Dave; MeeknMing
Bump & Ping
44
posted on
11/05/2003 8:36:57 AM PST
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: ItsOurTimeNow
You mean that snotty Kennedy kid, and that so-called "Republican" hippie?
To: DLfromthedesert
And Langevin, the liberal cripple.
But, yes. Heathens and losers, the whole stinking lot of 'em.
46
posted on
11/05/2003 10:07:11 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: rhughe13
Wow! I wish I had a congresscritter like him. I very rarely get any replies from my representitives. I think alot more of a politician when he replies, and the reply you got was very good. I wonder, if they had written a reply on this subject because they have had so many people writing about O'Connor?
What I gather from his remarks, is the Constitutions Article III states that when the person is a foreigner, the Justices need to consider the laws of his/her country or state. I don't think, from what he states, it means the citizens in our country. In fact, I would bet money, that it does not apply to the citizens of the U.S.A.
I am not a lawyer nor am I versed that much on the constitution, I am basing my opinion on the email you received from Rep. Mark Udall. Sandra Day O'Connor made it crystal clear that the reason for doing this was to make a better impression of the U.S. to the world. Which isn't the reason Article III was written.
Hopefully, they have been bombarded with emails, from people like you and I.
Thanks, for sharing it with us.
48
posted on
11/05/2003 1:24:51 PM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: EdReform
Impeachment is too good for her ...
49
posted on
11/05/2003 1:28:29 PM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
To: auggy; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
I heard about this on the way to Fort Jackson this weekend... I immediately called my Congressman (Crenshaw (R-FL-4)) and spoke with his aide who followed up on it and verified exactly what it was that she said.... Now we need to spread the word... Please call YOUR congresscritter and INSIST that action be taken against "Justice" O'Connor...
ANY U.S. Supreme Court Justice who considers "International Law" when rendering decisions is not worthy to hold office in these United States!!!!
FReegards,
David C. Osborne
50
posted on
11/05/2003 3:31:28 PM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
The frightening part is that she is a 'moderate'. Imagine what RBG must think about this issue???
51
posted on
11/05/2003 3:33:20 PM PST
by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: davidosborne
52
posted on
11/05/2003 3:34:50 PM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: BlueNgold
Scarry isn't it.... May God Help the United States of America.. !!
53
posted on
11/05/2003 3:35:56 PM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: auggy
Hold on. I do not believe that you can impeach a Supreme Court Justice. They serve for life. Period.
To: afraidfortherepublic
Rhe impeachment procedure still applies.. she has outwardly violated her OATH by stating that "international law" has ANY bearing on U.S. Supreme Court decisions period....
55
posted on
11/05/2003 3:51:24 PM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: auggy
I totally agree with you! She needs to be impeached. Thanks for the information!
56
posted on
11/05/2003 4:04:00 PM PST
by
NRA2BFree
(ISLAM: The religion of peace, love, dismemberment and murder!)
To: davidosborne
David,
On this one you are way behind the curve. Shortly after the Sodomy decision was rendered I contacted Tom Feeney (R- FL 24)and his legislative director about starting impeachment motions in the Judiciary Committee as he is a member of that committee. On calling back I was summarily informed that He will not uphold his oath of office and protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I stated that if the Justices went outside the Constitution for their decisions as they did in the sodomy case, then they were forfeiting their authority, as it comes from that very same Constitution. All he said was,"Very interesting theory you have there!" but Consgressman Feeney still will not submit motions for impeachment of the Supreme Court Justices. They are all traitors against the Constitution! When is everyone going to wake up to this!
Ravenstar
57
posted on
11/05/2003 4:20:06 PM PST
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Wrong they are subject to impeachment just the same as any other judge!
Ravenstar
58
posted on
11/05/2003 4:21:06 PM PST
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: Ravenstar
This is the CLEAREST example of TREASON that I have ever seen from a Supreme Court Justice.... I think if this got the publicity it deserves we might see some action by our congresscritters... Have you called your rep? What did he/she say? Please let me know.. This is not the last Mr. Crenshaw will hear from me on this issue....
FReegards,
David
59
posted on
11/05/2003 4:42:09 PM PST
by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: afraidfortherepublic
"Hold on. I do not believe that you can impeach a Supreme Court Justice. They serve for life. Period. "You are correct. They serve for life, unless they are impeached.
I believe they can be.
60
posted on
11/05/2003 5:05:01 PM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson