Impeach Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

The Washington Times ^ | 10-20-03 | Greg Pierce

[auggy]

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor aborts the U.S. Constitution; impeachable offense? In an unprecedented show of arrogance against America and the United States Constitution, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution , Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a speech that she and her colleagues on the Supreme Court are going to increasingly rely on international law rather than looking to the U.S. Constitution as they make their decisions. Disregarding her oath of office that she will uphold the U.S. Constitution seems to be an impeachable offense. In the infamous "Lawrence v. Texas" sodomy case this year, Mrs. O'Connor said the majority on the court used European legal precedent in making their rogue decision. And worse yet, she said that "Over time, we will rely increasingly on international and foreign courts in examining domestic issues." The Christian Coalition of America calls on Congress to begin reining in these arrogant renegade judges, and dealing with Justice O'Connor would be a good place to begin.

[auggy]

I for one, will not allow this treasonous woman to crap on our constitution and still keep her title as Supreme Court Justice. Below is a letter I found, which ,says exactly what I feel. This would be a good letter to send to your politicians. Please, freepers, this has got to end. It is high time we make an example out of these elitists.

Let's ALL write to our representitives and start removing these communists, while we still can.

Dear Sirs; I was appalled & angered at what I just learned regarding the comments of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Conner. In a recent speech she arrogantly stated that she and her colleagues were going to increasingly depend on international laws and foreign courts to interpret domestic issues instead of the U.S. Constitution in which she is obligated to uphold.

It is my understanding that anyone holding a federally elected or appointed position is required to uphold the Constitution of the United States. It is my strong persuasion that anyone who would purposely undermine the U.S. Constitution is manifesting an unpatriotic attitude towards our "beloved county" that is founded on that very Constitution. Please help initiate proceedings of impeachment upon your findings of investigation.

I am requesting that you begin an immediate investigation into Mrs. Sandra Day O'Conner and her violation of her oath of office as Supreme Court Justice. I would also request an investigation of her court decisions as well as the decisions of her colleagues.

I, for one, will not stand by and see this country surrender its sovereignty. I am just one of many "grass-root" voters who intend to do something about it.

Below is a link to email your representitives.

http://congress.nw.dc.us/townhall/home/

[Steve_Seattle]

I agree that a Supreme Court justice who says she will rely on contemporary international law rather than American constitutional law should be impeached. This is nothing less than abrogating the Constitution.

[auggy]

Let's go Freeper's!

Isn't this what we are all about?

[45Auto]

Her remarks border on treason. The problem is to get enough House members to actually draw up Articles of Impeachment; being cowards, I don't see that happening. Even if the House had the guts to do it, the US Senate, with its "majority" of RAT-bastards + 5 RINOs would never vote to convict. Still, the idea has merit.

[DLfromthedesert]

I know my congressman won't get into this. Her sister is a prominent pol in this area.

[auggy]

"I agree that a Supreme Court justice who says she will rely on contemporary international law rather than American constitutional law should be impeached. This is nothing less than abrogating the Constitution"

I hope I can depend on you to ,"copy & paste", or write your own letter to your representitives.

I takes very little time.

[steplock]

Here are just a FEW articles converning the Treasonous SCOTUS justices:

'Literalism must be avoided because there is no surer way to misread any document than to read it literally.'

"If you do it right, you people here will become law clerks and the law clerks will become judges and the assistant secretaries and YOU'LL RUN THE WORLD."

We no longer live in a Constitutional Republic

Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer: U. S. Constitution should be subordinated to international will

Impeach the U.S. Supreme Court

.

[goodnesswins]

Maybe we have to wait until she (or other members) actually DO RELY on international law.....??? Yeah, her statement is BAD, but have any of her actions exhibited this relying on others laws?

[HennepinPrisoner]

She needs to be impeached as do any other justices that admit to agreeing with her statement.

[auggy]

Thanks, for the links.

[b4its2late]

Like I said on another thread when this news came out.... She's lost her marbles.

[auggy]

"Maybe we have to wait until she (or other members) actually DO RELY on international law.....??? Yeah, her statement is BAD, but have any of her actions exhibited this relying on others laws?"

The first cited case was decided in 2002 when the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, she said. In arriving at that decision, Justice O'Connor said, the high court noted that the world community overwhelmingly disapproved of the practice. Also influential was a court brief filed by American diplomats who discussed the difficulties confronted in their foreign missions due to U.S. death-penalty practices, she said. The second ruling cited by Justice O'Connor was the striking down of the Texas antisodomy law, relying partly on a series of decisions by European courts on the same issue.

"I suspect," Justice O'Connor said, "that over time we will rely increasingly — or take notice, at least — increasingly on international and foreign courts in examining domestic issues."

Enough, said?

[Steve_Seattle]

The problem is that O'Connor isn't the only one who thinks this way - Breyer does too. This kind of thinking mainly poses a threat to the 2nd Amendment; private ownership of guns is under attack worldwide.

[auggy]

"Like I said on another thread when this news came out.... She's lost her marbles."

Like Rush says,"Words mean things". Whether she is crazy or not, she should be taken down.

[auggy]

"The problem is that O'Connor isn't the only one who thinks this way - Breyer does too. This kind of thinking mainly poses a threat to the 2nd Amendment; private ownership of guns is under attack worldwide."

That's right. Are we going to allow this to happen?

O'Connor is a good one to start with, the others will come later.

Just because she isn't the only one that thinks this way, shouldn't mean we just let them do what they want.

Dammit we have to start somewhere.

[auggy]

Copy & Paste. It really only takes a minute.

[auggy]

"She needs to be impeached as do any other justices that admit to agreeing with her statement."

Thank You!

Let's do it.

[onedoug]

I'm in.

I'll write my rep, Diane Watson (D-Los Angeles), but we all know she'll put it her File 13.

[Senormechanico]

I wrote 'em all.
Thanks.
Freedom is not free, but email makes it close.
We nuked CBS!
Congrats Freepers!!