Skip to comments.
FOX NEWS; CBS WANTS REAGAN MOVIE GONE
fox news
| 11-2-03
| Bootstick
Posted on 11/01/2003 10:38:26 PM PST by BOOTSTICK
Fox news reports at 1:30 am est, that CBS would like to sell the upcomming Reagan movie to Showtime, for a sum of $9 million , also CBS head says, lawyers to go over movie for accuracy.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: barbrastreisand; boycott; cbs; cbsschadenfreude; ccrm; movie; presstitutes; reagan; schadenfreude; seebs; thereagans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-237 next last
To: kayak
Yep, the percentages are against it, and I wouldn't be too sure that a republican vote is much better, althought at the moment the percentages are a little better, as is the direction pursued by the Republicans to attempt to protect the country, however, the lack of stance on illegal aliens, and free-for-all imigration leaves a lot to be desired and bodes much ill for the future.
101
posted on
11/02/2003 6:41:12 AM PST
by
wita
To: Richard Kimball
Your # 100.....great analogy, Richard.
Leni
To: MeeknMing
Meek, is that first clip for real or doctored? If real, good grief what a letch, and right in front of a camera.
To: Tall_Texan
LOL!! Decisions, decisions--what's a left-wing biased tv station to do when their covers are pulled?
104
posted on
11/02/2003 6:54:08 AM PST
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
<< [Davis's] ... starring role in a fifth-rate hatchet job on a dying man is not much to be proud of. >>
#59 BTTT!
105
posted on
11/02/2003 6:58:13 AM PST
by
Brian Allen
( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
To: BOOTSTICK
Only $9 million? ... Moonves can buy it himself, and show it at home to all his Marxist friends.
106
posted on
11/02/2003 7:01:43 AM PST
by
bimbo
To: SAJ
Clinton Broadcasting System
I thought it was originally the Carter Broadcasting System. Guess they just changed what the "C" represents.
To: BOOTSTICK
lawyers to go over movie for accuracy. A hit piece by two flaming queer producers consulting with Barbara Striesand! Duuh!!
To: GeronL
If CBS takes the lies out of their version, there will be less than ten seconds of movie!!! If that much!
109
posted on
11/02/2003 7:12:04 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: Yaelle
Us right wing thugs!!!!!
110
posted on
11/02/2003 7:12:51 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: ETERNAL WARMING
"Get rid of Al, Ronnie, or youre never going to end the cold war! Bingo. All right! he says. Now get off my goddamn back, will you?
From what I've heard about President Reagan, he never talked this way.
Poor James Brolin, a 5th-rate actor with no job prospects in sight, married to a harpy who is probably now not in the best of moods.
111
posted on
11/02/2003 7:13:32 AM PST
by
ladylib
To: ETERNAL WARMING
. This is censorship, says one source. A pressure group has had a major network rip this movie to shreds. Horse pucky. It's only censorship if the government makes you edit a piece. When the hew and cry of the public forces you to edit a piece, it's called holding your feet to the fire to produce a piece that the public will purchase.
To: Tall_Texan
Viacom also owns VH1...you should see how they chop up Reagan on the "I love the 80's" flashback/nostalgia shows.
The bias is extraordinary.
Good day for The People
Bad day for the Dem goons at CBS!
113
posted on
11/02/2003 7:16:45 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: ETERNAL WARMING
This is censorship, says one source. A pressure group has had a major network rip this movie to shreds. No, idiot. This is the market at work. Censorship denotes government-imposed restrictions, and the govenment hasn't had a hand in this subject.
To: GeronL
[ Lets make a movie about the Clintons. Lets show them planning and laughing while talking about ripping off the FDIC. Lets show them personally running drugs through Arkansas and offing Vincent Foster and ordering hits on people like Ron Brwn. ]
-AND/OR- with a part showing one of the Clintoon D.C. parties with marines in full dress uniforms as waiters to give their smarmy friends something to laugh at... with appropriate dialog... BOY! would that would make even the RINO's cough up their beer and spill their popcorn...
I say let them play the Reagan piece, and go them one better on Fox.. because the democrats are a target rice enviroment.
To: BOOTSTICK
Bump
116
posted on
11/02/2003 7:43:49 AM PST
by
auboy
(Liberals believe in free speech… theirs not yours.)
To: GeronL
"Lets make a movie about the Clintons. Lets show them planning and laughing while talking about ripping off the FDIC. Lets show them personally running drugs through Arkansas and offing Vincent Foster and ordering hits on people like Ron Brwn."
Have Rush Limbaugh play Clinton! He has the voice dead on!
To: opbuzz
>>
This is censorship, says one source.Nope...Just consumers making a choice where to spend their money!
118
posted on
11/02/2003 7:45:20 AM PST
by
Wondervixen
(Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
To: woodyinscc
CBS should give Free Republic $9 million to make a factual and truthful movie about both Clintons.
They want a ratings boost? I'll give em a ratings boost!
119
posted on
11/02/2003 8:00:58 AM PST
by
CT
To: suzyq5558; Fred Mertz
I have a Sat dish and live just close enough to a city 60 miles away that I can't get NBCCBSABCPBS on the antenna or dish for alledged legal reasons er sumpthin. Haven't watched em in 10 years I've been living here. And haven't missed Katie, Peter or Dans "Shit'n Shineola Show" at all..... Only reason I know they are still on this earth is FR threads like this.
One has to wonder if such bad films are subsidized by the socialist democrats backed National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Thus Communist Backed Sedition Ltd doesn't really care if they lose sponsors or financial backing. They get the free publicity and face time in the nooooooze anyway.
Stay Safe Ya'll !
120
posted on
11/02/2003 8:10:20 AM PST
by
Squantos
("Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-237 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson