Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS; CBS WANTS REAGAN MOVIE GONE
fox news | 11-2-03 | Bootstick

Posted on 11/01/2003 10:38:26 PM PST by BOOTSTICK

Fox news reports at 1:30 am est, that CBS would like to sell the upcomming Reagan movie to Showtime, for a sum of $9 million , also CBS head says, lawyers to go over movie for accuracy.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: barbrastreisand; boycott; cbs; cbsschadenfreude; ccrm; movie; presstitutes; reagan; schadenfreude; seebs; thereagans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2003 10:38:26 PM PST by BOOTSTICK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
It looks like the public outcry over their revisionist history has forced them to backpedal.

An informed public CAN counteract any abuse of power.
2 posted on 11/01/2003 10:41:11 PM PST by clee1 (Where's the beef???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Oh, and so they refuse to re-edit it???
3 posted on 11/01/2003 10:41:20 PM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Assuming this is an accurate report, why do I somehow think that the Clinton Broadcasting System bit off WAY more than it can chew on this little project? Heh heh heh...

And, next question, who's the idiot at Showtime who's going to put that operation in the crapper by laying out $9 mil for this revisionist hit piece?

4 posted on 11/01/2003 10:42:53 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1
BS must be really upset. HA! HA!
5 posted on 11/01/2003 10:43:44 PM PST by raisincane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
I'd like to see it first in order to determine its true value.
6 posted on 11/01/2003 10:43:49 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Guess CBS wants to play hot potato now...wonder is anyone else wants to play??? Think Bar is stomping around her house a little put out?????
7 posted on 11/01/2003 10:44:09 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
"who's the idiot at Showtime"

And .. how many people who have Showtime will threaten to cancel if they plan to show the movie.

Looks like Hillary's plan to smear the repubs didn't work out too well. Sorry Blabs .. you'll have to try some other method of bowing and scraping to the Clintons .. I'm sure they'll think of something.
8 posted on 11/01/2003 10:47:02 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SAJ; BOOTSTICK
Maybe PBS will pay $9M tax dollars to show it??
9 posted on 11/01/2003 10:47:22 PM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Actually, I rather hope PBS does pay to air this garbage -- might provide just the impetus needed for the Regress to defund their sorry butts.

No such luck, probably...sigh.

10 posted on 11/01/2003 10:51:06 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
If this is true, it's one of the smartest moves CBS has made in years.
11 posted on 11/01/2003 10:52:15 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
I love it. We activists have MADE SOMETHING HAPPEN. Hit 'em in the wallet; it works every time.
12 posted on 11/01/2003 10:52:22 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
I'd like to see it first in order to determine its true value.

CBS now has on it's hands, what is commenly called a liability!!

13 posted on 11/01/2003 10:52:50 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
CBS really proved it was on the side of the Communists with this hit piece.
14 posted on 11/01/2003 10:53:07 PM PST by Steely Glint ("Communists are just Democrats in a big hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Title: The War Over the Gipper (Conservatives erupt. CBS cowers. The director walks. The untold story behind the meltdown of ‘The Reagans’ mini-series)
Source: MSNBC
URL Source: http://www.msnbc.com/news/987895.asp? 0cv=KA01
Published: Nov 2, 2003
Author: Sean Smith and Marc Peyser
Post Date: 2003-11-02 01:20:51 by out damned spot
2 Comments



James Brolin and Judy Davis, who play Ron and Nancy in "The Reagans," have been silent about the film



The War Over the Gipper Conservatives erupt. CBS cowers. The director walks. The untold story behind the meltdown of ‘The Reagans’ mini-series

By Sean Smith and Marc Peyser NEWSWEEK


Nov. 10 issue — President Reagan is lounging in his pajamas trying to watch TV when Nancy starts that old argument again. “Al Haig’s got to go,” she tells Ron. Nancy never liked Haig, and now she’s needling her husband again. “You know what he did when you were in the hospital?” she asks. “I know he thought he was going to take control, but that’s not so bad,” Ron says amiably, between bites of an Oreo. Finally, she swoops in front of the president, placing her blood-red nightgown between him and the television, and gets him where it hurts most. “Get rid of Al, Ronnie, or you’re never going to end the cold war!” Bingo. “All right!” he says. “Now get off my goddamn back, will you?”

YOU THINK that fight sounds ugly? It’s nothing compared to the brawl over CBS’s “The Reagans.” This mini-series (scheduled for Nov. 16), is full of scenes from a marriage like the one above, some of them loving, a few of them nasty and many of them certain to tick people off. Two weeks after a leaked script ignited protests, “The Reagans” has become radioactive—and nobody’s even seen it yet. A Web site called boycottcbs.com recorded more than 45,000 hits in less than a week. Such commentators as Bill O’Reilly have made “The Reagans” the plat du jour on their menus, and the Republican National Committee now demands that CBS let historians vet the show. But the ugliest battle is inside CBS itself. Stars Judy Davis and James Brolin decline to do any press. Director Robert Allan Ackerman has opted out of the editing, and CBS executives are now cutting it themselves. As one person close to the film says, “It’s being edited with a machete.” Sources tell NEWSWEEK that the network has even considered selling the $9 million film to Showtime.






What’s even more amazing is that none of this happened sooner. “The Reagans” was always meant to be a warts-and-all portrait of an American icon, with ample attention to the president’s hands-off approach to governing, his wife’s behind-the-scenes power plays and their estrangement from their children. Still, CBS thought the movie was, so to speak, fair and balanced. It credits Reagan with defeating the Soviet Union, and its central theme is the First Couple’s love affair. The script was vetted by two teams of lawyers, and producers Neil Meron and Craig Zadan, who would not be interviewed by NEWSWEEK, have insisted that every fact (though not every line of dialogue) is supported by at least two sources. Before a New York Times story last month detailed conservatives’ complaints, network executives reportedly loved the movie. “They all thought it was brilliant,” says someone who worked on the film.

But the day the Times’s story broke—”The Reagans” crew calls it “Black Tuesday”—the movie instantly became trouble. CBS chairman Leslie Moonves, who approved both the script and a juicy eight-minute trailer, ordered the lawyers to look at the movie again, and asked for assurances that the facts were all in order. When he was told everything was fine, Moonves started editing anyway. “There are things we think go too far,” he told CNBC’s Tina Brown last week. (Moonves also declined to be interviewed by NEWSWEEK.) At that point, Ackerman removed himself from the editing in protest and the actors stopped talking. “Nobody seems to know what’s going on,” Ackerman told NEWSWEEK. “Whatever is going on is going on very secretly.”




As of late last week, the film had been through at least three edits. The most incendiary line—where Nancy asks the president to do more for AIDS victims and he replies, “They that live in sin shall die in sin”—has been cut. So has footage of a young Ron Reagan Jr. doing ballet. (Go figure.) Most of the other cuts come from Nancy’s scenes. For all the concern about how the president is portrayed, Davis’s take on Nancy looks like Lady Macbeth in a couture dress. “The film version is so milquetoast compared to what her daughter wrote,” says Carl Anthony, a producer of the film who once wrote speeches for Nancy. “It’s odd to me when people get all worked up, because it’s called a dramatization. They forget what that means.”

Will the changes satisfy skeptics? Don’t bet on it. “I had some Republican call me yesterday,” says Jeff Wald, Brolin’s manager. “He said, ‘You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. He has Alzheimer’s and can’t defend himself.’ Could Jackie Kennedy defend herself when they did the movie on her?” Michael Paranzino, who launched boycottcbs.com, says nothing short of a complete remake would get him to cancel his campaign. “I think they should pull it from November,” he says, “bring in consultants who aren’t hostile to Reagan and try to come up with a truly balanced picture.” Of course if CBS does dump the movie on Showtime—both owned by Viacom—much of the heat would dissipate into the cable ether. But some who worked on the film worry about the long-term implications of “The Reagans” controversy. “This is censorship,” says one source. “A pressure group has had a major network rip this movie to shreds.” But we can look forward to one fun outcome: the director’s-cut DVD.

15 posted on 11/01/2003 10:53:21 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Is Showtime owned by Viacom
16 posted on 11/01/2003 10:53:40 PM PST by sharkhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: clee1
Newsweek article (posted on MNBC)


http://www.msnbc.com/news/987895.asp?0cv=KA01&cp1=1

The War Over the Gipper

Conservatives erupt. CBS cowers. The director walks. The untold story behind the meltdown of ‘The Reagans’ mini-series

By Sean Smith and Marc Peyser
NEWSWEEK
    Nov. 10 issue —  President Reagan is lounging in his pajamas trying to watch TV when Nancy starts that old argument again. “Al Haig’s got to go,” she tells Ron. Nancy never liked Haig, and now she’s needling her husband again. “You know what he did when you were in the hospital?” she asks. “I know he thought he was going to take control, but that’s not so bad,” Ron says amiably, between bites of an Oreo. Finally, she swoops in front of the president, placing her blood-red nightgown between him and the television, and gets him where it hurts most. “Get rid of Al, Ronnie, or you’re never going to end the cold war!” Bingo. “All right!” he says. “Now get off my goddamn back, will you?”  
 
YOU THINK that fight sounds ugly? It’s nothing compared to the brawl over CBS’s “The Reagans.” This mini-series (scheduled for Nov. 16), is full of scenes from a marriage like the one above, some of them loving, a few of them nasty and many of them certain to tick people off. Two weeks after a leaked script ignited protests, “The Reagans” has become radioactive—and nobody’s even seen it yet. A Web site called boycottcbs.com recorded more than 45,000 hits in less than a week. Such commentators as Bill O’Reilly have made “The Reagans” the plat du jour on their menus, and the Republican National Committee now demands that CBS let historians vet the show. But the ugliest battle is inside CBS itself. Stars Judy Davis and James Brolin decline to do any press. Director Robert Allan Ackerman has opted out of the editing, and CBS executives are now cutting it themselves. As one person close to the film says, “It’s being edited with a machete.” Sources tell NEWSWEEK that the network has even considered selling the $9 million film to Showtime.

        What’s even more amazing is that none of this happened sooner. “The Reagans” was always meant to be a warts-and-all portrait of an American icon, with ample attention to the president’s hands-off approach to governing, his wife’s behind-the-scenes power plays and their estrangement from their children. Still, CBS thought the movie was, so to speak, fair and balanced. It credits Reagan with defeating the Soviet Union, and its central theme is the First Couple’s love affair. The script was vetted by two teams of lawyers, and producers Neil Meron and Craig Zadan, who would not be interviewed by NEWSWEEK, have insisted that every fact (though not every line of dialogue) is supported by at least two sources. Before a New York Times story last month detailed conservatives’ complaints, network executives reportedly loved the movie. “They all thought it was brilliant,” says someone who worked on the film.
        But the day the Times’s story broke—”The Reagans” crew calls it “Black Tuesday”—the movie instantly became trouble. CBS chairman Leslie Moonves, who approved both the script and a juicy eight-minute trailer, ordered the lawyers to look at the movie again, and asked for assurances that the facts were all in order. When he was told everything was fine, Moonves started editing anyway. “There are things we think go too far,” he told CNBC’s Tina Brown last week. (Moonves also declined to be interviewed by NEWSWEEK.) At that point, Ackerman removed himself from the editing in protest and the actors stopped talking. “Nobody seems to know what’s going on,” Ackerman told NEWSWEEK. “Whatever is going on is going on very secretly.”
       As of late last week, the film had been through at least three edits. The most incendiary line—where Nancy asks the president to do more for AIDS victims and he replies, “They that live in sin shall die in sin”—has been cut. So has footage of a young Ron Reagan Jr. doing ballet. (Go figure.) Most of the other cuts come from Nancy’s scenes. For all the concern about how the president is portrayed, Davis’s take on Nancy looks like Lady Macbeth in a couture dress. “The film version is so milquetoast compared to what her daughter wrote,” says Carl Anthony, a producer of the film who once wrote speeches for Nancy. “It’s odd to me when people get all worked up, because it’s called a dramatization. They forget what that means.”
        Will the changes satisfy skeptics? Don’t bet on it. “I had some Republican call me yesterday,” says Jeff Wald, Brolin’s manager. “He said, ‘You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. He has Alzheimer’s and can’t defend himself.’ Could Jackie Kennedy defend herself when they did the movie on her?” Michael Paranzino, who launched boycottcbs.com, says nothing short of a complete remake would get him to cancel his campaign. “I think they should pull it from November,” he says, “bring in consultants who aren’t hostile to Reagan and try to come up with a truly balanced picture.” Of course if CBS does dump the movie on Showtime—both owned by Viacom—much of the heat would dissipate into the cable ether. But some who worked on the film worry about the long-term implications of “The Reagans” controversy. “This is censorship,” says one source. “A pressure group has had a major network rip this movie to shreds.” But we can look forward to one fun outcome: the director’s-cut DVD.

 


17 posted on 11/01/2003 10:53:42 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Controversy, fake ethics and morality concerns on the part of CBS executives and talking heads is free publicity, nothing more.......they'll show this film yet IMO. ..........on CBS !

Stay Safe !

18 posted on 11/01/2003 10:54:47 PM PST by Squantos ("Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
You nailed it bro'.
19 posted on 11/01/2003 10:56:48 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
hey Fredrick.
20 posted on 11/01/2003 11:01:49 PM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson