Eye-yi-yi-yi-yi.
Just when you think the judiciary can't get any more hostile...
1 posted on
10/31/2003 8:44:53 AM PST by
WillRain
To: WillRain
Are there any Biblical injunctions against Lesbianism? I was not aware of any.
2 posted on
10/31/2003 8:46:35 AM PST by
gridlock
(Rooting for the Yankees means you can say, "We'll get 'em next year!", and mean it!)
To: WillRain
I truly think if he'd said that to me I'd tell him to "F Off".
3 posted on
10/31/2003 8:48:39 AM PST by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: WillRain
Surely, this "judge" has overstepped his boundaries...
No way ANYONE has the right to tell you what you can or cannot say in the country. (I must be dreaming)
4 posted on
10/31/2003 8:49:38 AM PST by
Terridan
(God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
To: WillRain
Why exactly is this breaking news? It happened yesterday, there is no ongoing drama, and the story has already been posted several times this morning under various threads.
To: WillRain
Might as well just start handing the kiddies off to the state to raise. When a parent's ability to teach to their morality is infringed upon, then the parent's ability to parent is taken away!
6 posted on
10/31/2003 8:49:55 AM PST by
CSM
(Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
To: WillRain
The directive arose from the decision to award joint parenting responsibilities for her daughter to a practicing homosexual. Would they give joint custody to a Christian and a Satanist?
If you ask me, the Colorado Courts need a good spanking.
Shalom.
8 posted on
10/31/2003 8:52:36 AM PST by
ArGee
(Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
To: WillRain
I suppose it would be OK to teach the kid how to be a prostitute, take drugs or steal, but oh no we can't let them be exposed to that bigotted Christianity.
To: WillRain
So it's happened. Judges can now order parents how to raise their children.
Unless we can release the Left's death-grip on the judiciary, we are royally screwed.
To: WillRain
13 posted on
10/31/2003 8:55:07 AM PST by
TomServo
("Yes, I will take money from my dad's wallet and send it to Soupy Sales.")
To: WillRain
This is an outrage! How dare these judges tell parents what to teach their children!
Hope David Limbaugh is seeing this, he can add it to his very long list of persecution of Christians!
14 posted on
10/31/2003 8:55:19 AM PST by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: WillRain
I don't understand. Someone please explain to me how a judge has authority to make whatever "laws" he wants. The 1st amendment only protects us from Congress. How can the Bill of Rights protect us from a judge who wants to abridge free speech?
15 posted on
10/31/2003 8:56:35 AM PST by
m1-lightning
(Lick your fingers and touch two pinball machines at the same time.)
To: WillRain
For class reading. Thanks.
16 posted on
10/31/2003 8:56:37 AM PST by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...if we can keep it!)
To: WillRain
There is so much wrong with this, it's hard to know where to begin! Basically, the judge just ruled that one lifestyle is acceptable and another is not. God forbid the lesbian could be prohibited from infringing on the mother's Christian beliefs!
In case you're wondering, this is called "tolerance".
24 posted on
10/31/2003 9:19:21 AM PST by
pgyanke
("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)
To: WillRain
The "phobic" part is another advertising ploy, like "gay," to twist and spin things in their favor.
Because you don't agree or like or condone a practice does not necessarily mean that you are afraid of it.
25 posted on
10/31/2003 9:22:03 AM PST by
PoorMuttly
(Operation Noble Muttly)
To: WillRain
This is just the latest in a serie of egregious actions by politically connected hacks who also happen to have legal degrees, legislating from the bench.
This vile creature should be impeached and flushed down the nearest storm sewer. But of course he won't be. These legal political hacks have succeeded in intimadating the other branches of the government and the generel public into believing they are sacrosanct - modern day Tribunes.
34 posted on
10/31/2003 9:54:24 AM PST by
ZULU
To: WillRain
In Florida a judge took two biological children from their mother and gave them to a mutilated woman who claims to be a man. One of the reasons was that the mother was "too religious."
35 posted on
10/31/2003 9:57:22 AM PST by
Dante3
To: WillRain
Unbelievable as it sounds....
This is true.
My husband and I have fallen victim to such court orders.
Our court order stated, what church we could attend with the children and it further told us what religious or non-religious events we could attend including persons who would visit us at our home on the weekends we had the children.
My husband I have a hard time with not attending the Christian church of our choice full-time or on a regular basis. It seems Our freedoms only come when we have $ to hire that non existing lawyer to fight for what is right.
Oh by the way, this is a life appointment judge of Billy Clinton.
In an area that Rev. Al, nor Jessie, much less any of the number of civil rights lawyer, will Not be seen out in this neck of the woods.
So we have to wait this one out.
For the love of God and Country,
SemperFi
36 posted on
10/31/2003 10:04:52 AM PST by
sns5151
To: WillRain
The weed of hatred bears peculiar fruit.
53 posted on
10/31/2003 12:51:20 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson