Posted on 10/29/2003 11:13:07 PM PST by JohnHuang2
HOLLYWOOD VS. AMERICA
Clint Eastwood drops in on Michael Savage
Hollywood icon concerned about backlash from patriotic Americans
Posted: October 29, 2003
5:00 p.m. Eastern
By Art Moore
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.comAn impromptu telephone call yesterday from director Clint Eastwood shows Hollywood is concerned about the impact of millions of patriotic Americans who listen to talk radio, says Michael Savage, who engaged in the surprise conversation on his nationally syndicated show.
In an interview with WorldNetDaily, Savage noted the call came amid furor over the upcoming CBS miniseries "The Reagans" which apparently has prompted network chief Les Moonves to order some changes.
Clint Eastwood"They're terrified of the boycott that is rolling along like a snowball," Savage said. "And Clint is a wise enough businessman to understand that movies build by word of mouth. They can also die by word of mouth."
The call was prompted by Savage's suggestion people might be ignoring Eastwood's new film "Mystic River" because it features two of Hollywood's most outspoken critics of the U.S. and its policies, Sean Penn and Tim Robbins.
Penn made a controversial three-day "fact finding" trip to Baghdad last winter. He then paid to have a massive, rambling essay published in the New York Times defending his visit after he was accused of being a tool for Iraqi propaganda. Robbins, in a speech to the National Press Club in April, said the United States is now viewed by much of the world as the Soviet Union once was, "as a rogue state."
"When [Eastwood] heard me bashing his movie he probably got afraid that I might keep a million or two million people away from the theater and could keep another million or two away who might otherwise make a discretionary decision," Savage said.
The talk host said Eastwood was very courteous and insisted the film was doing much better than it was being portrayed.
"I thought it was a very good interchange, and it indicated Hollywood is listening to conservative talk radio," he said. "They understand that we are conservative and that we go to the movies."
Savage said the point he was making before Eastwood called was "maybe the people are finally waking up, and they are not going to the movies of these anti-American, anti-war actors who shoot their mouths off and then think people are too stupid to remember when their movies come out."
The radio host said he told Eastwood, "Irrespective of the fact that I like every movie you've ever made, I will not bring myself to go to a movie with Sean Penn, after what he's done to our troops."
According to Savage, the director replied, "Well that's certainly your prerogative."
Eastwood said he just happened to tune in the show yesterday as he was driving around, but Savage, citing a mutual friend, says the Hollywood icon is a regular listener.
"As I understand he loves it," Savage said. "But he can't admit that. He's a good politician, a very wise politician."
Among Eastwood's first words when he called were "Arnold didn't call you, but I will," Savage related.
The reference indicated Eastwood's knowledge of Arnold Schwarzenegger's willingness to come on nearly every radio show in California during his gubernatorial campaign, except for the Michael Savage Show.
Savage said Eastwood gave no indication of his political leanings, however.
"He's a director, has a lot at stake here," Savage said. "He's just trying to protect his investment. I tried to treat him with dignity, because he treated me with dignity."
How 'bout if he goes back, just to FIND some facts???
No, I want an essay, too. ;o)
BUMP
Eastwood is more a libertarian than a conservative. The Outlaw Josey Wales clearly showed the malevolence of the Federal government, specifically the Union Army, which is portrayed as brutal as Stalin's Red Army or Hitler's SS. In the second Dirty Harry movie, the lead character was fighting a secret unit in the San Francisco police department that was using vigilante tactics. In the view of that movie, these law 'n' order cops were as bad as the criminals and more dangerous than the liberals at City Hall.
I also suspect Eastwood, not unlike Sandra Day O'Connor, has past the "three score years and ten" marker and may want to leave a positive legacy. He also recognizes that liberals write the history books, especially the history of movies. If his health holds out, Eastwood may fear that some leftist filmmaker in 2020 will do an attack movie on him, much as former President Reagan. Unlike the Gipper, Eastwood may have his faculties with him when he is 90. As a result, he may want to build up some sympathy from the liberal elite. Using two actors who are not just limousine liberals, but leftist radicals, may be a form of protection from insults in his declining years and slander or relegation to the "memory hole" after his death.
I have heard it said that Eastwood is spending the second half of his filmmaking career apologizing for the first. It is likely that he wants to be remembered in a positive light and is therefore inclined to compromise with the powers that be.
Since when did appeasing liberals ever pay off? Eastwood would have been wiser to cast two actors who had never made horses @sses out of themselves, or even two relatively unknown actors. I don't care how great Eastwood is, I will never see another movie with Robbins or Penn, and that includes movies that are on TV. It may be impossible to have any control over Hollywood, but I can sure as hell control what I spend my time watching, reading or listening to. Maybe if enough people let Eastwood and others like him know how passionately conservatives feel about this, they would stop using idiots like Penn and Robbins.
Yes it does. The projectile vomiting reflex which happens any time penn or robbins appears really detracts from the movie experience.
One blatant communist can ruin a whole movie and this movie has two of them.
Clint Eastwood is not the fearless "Dirty Harry," just a man who knows who butters his bread and who supplies both the bread and the butter. Unfortunately, the "who" are not conservatives.
It was an outstanding movie. I'm going to see it agian, and plan on getting it when it comes out on DVD.
He used Robbins and Penn because both men are great actors, fit the roles perfectly and turned in stellar performances in that movie.
That's certainly your prerogative, but the movie itself is excellent and well worth watching.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.