New Secret Aircraft? The mysterious TR-3B

hostileinvader ^

[steplock]

GoHotSprings

[TLOne]

It's those danmed Council on Foriegn Relations people who are keeping us from using the TR-3B to defeat the mole people.

We don't have enough TR-3B's to fight both the mole people and the robots at the same time. Tell Rumsfeld to tell us the truth.

[aculeus]

Stale gibberish. See #58.

[Las Vegas Dave]

OPI?

[fourdeuce82d]

g-forces if gravity is neutralized.

dear silly person- g-froces do not refer to gravity- they refer to inertia/resistance to a change in vector. That is all, over.

[abclily]

It wasn't being used as a possessive?

[Partisan Hack]

I'm sorry I'm such a silly person. Thank you for taking the time for enlightening a mere troglodyte like myself. I'm unworthy of the time and effort you took to set such an idiot like myself straight.

[fourdeuce82d]

I guess physicists need only to consult with you before embarking on ANY research that might challenge your "reality."

Nope. but they probably will consult "reality" before giving credence to some semi-literate gibberish that reads as though it were scribbled by the misbegotten spawn of an unholy union between a Syphlitic buggering cappuchin spider monkey and an evil mutant dwarf from a high-gravity planet.

[aruanan]

No. "It's" is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is" and so an apostrophe is approriate[sic]. "Its" is used as a possessive form for "it", and no apostrophe is required. [just as I said] If you are going to be a spelling Nazi, try to get it write.

No, the first word in the sentence reproduced below is supposed to be "its," no apostrophe.

It's un-earthly technology and sight will literally blow your mind.

If, as you insist, the first word should be "It's", we wind up with a nonsense sentence:

It is un-earthly technology and sight will literally blow your mind.

However, if it's "Its", as I, the spelling Nazi, insist, we have a grammatically correct, though largely senseless, sentence:

Its unearthly technology and sight will literally blow your mind.

[aruanan]

Oh wait! You WERE correct! Sorry. Proceed.

Sorry, Lancy. I didn't see this one before responding to the other one.

[Khurkris]

TR-3B's are babe magnets. I thought everybody knew about these.

[Grut]

I actually owned a TR-3A in 62.

When you think about it, 'alien technology' might explain a lot about Brit cars of the period. Especially if it was imperfectly understood.

[Quix]

My relative asserted we had more advanced platforms than this from ET help and reverse engineering both in bomb delivery models and recon models as well as models which carried people--35+ YEARS ago.

[Catspaw]

If I get an anti-grav machine, does that mean I weigh nothing? If so, kewl.

[xrp]

Fascinating.

[Edgar3]

He who allows no expansion of mind contracts. He who imagines no possibilities stagnates. He who will not entertain possibilities lives in yesterday. He who will not lighten up needs Ex Lax. Fire away...

[drjoe]

No, it's the two seater that leaked oil like a seive,

[_Jim]

If I get an anti-grav machine, does that mean I weigh nothing? If so, kewl.

Yup.

No limit on weight (snicker) just size or 'girth'/circumferential limits (chuckle chucle) - 'if you can move it - this thing can tranport it' (har har) ...

[Junior]

Not really. I was fairly young when the F-117 plowed into the side of that mountain in California. On the other hand, the F-117 doesn't rely on "alien technology" that currently defies the laws of physics...

[Catspaw]

No limit on weight (snicker) just size or 'girth'/circumferential limits (chuckle chucle) - 'if you can move it - this thing can tranport it' (har har) ...

LOL! In that case, I'll get an anti-grav machine for the dog, too. The vet wants him to be as thin as a whippet.