Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Honor Indian Treaties - Get Involved
http://www.honorindiantreaties.com/act/ ^

Posted on 10/29/2003 3:26:15 PM PST by SheLion

alt
alt
- HOME - ABOUT - LEARN MORE - GET INVOLVED - NEWS - ADS - CONTACT -
alt
alt


Get Involved

New York State wants to break the law.

Governor Pataki has already called it unconstitutional.

And yet, it’s been adopted for the 2003-04 budget.

It’s a provision that calls for the State Department of Taxation and Finance to collect tax on the sale of tobacco and gasoline on Native American territories. The state’s unconstitutional action will cause over 1,000 Indians and non-Indians to lose their jobs, consumer prices to rise and businesses to close.

Tell Governor Pataki to honor the supreme law of the land. Tell him that to break centuries old treaties would be to break the law.

Click on the link below to send an email message to Governor Pataki.

Because it’s wrong.

Because it’s not fair.

Because you won’t let it happen.

Contact the Governor:

Call Governor Pataki at 518-474-7516 or send him an email message by visiting his web site (http://www.state.ny.us/governor/) and clicking on "Contact the Governor."

If you wish to contact other state representatives, visit the state Assembly home page (http://www.assembly.state.ny.us/) or the state Senate home page (http://www.senate.state.ny.us/).

We are also encouraging supporters to send letters to the editors of the daily newspapers in New York state. Links to most of the state's media outlets are on a web site called the Empire Page (http://www.empirepage.com/medialinks.html).


Sample Message:
If you wish, copy the text below and paste it into your message:


alt
- HOME - ABOUT - LEARN MORE - GET INVOLVED - NEWS - ADS - CONTACT -
alt
alt

This web site is sponsored by the Seneca Nation of Indians

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: americanindians; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-204 next last
To: Henrietta
Pointing out the unfairness of treating people differently based on their ethnicity is hardly absurd. Are you an affirmative action supporter?

It is absurd to hear you whine that Indians have somehow gotten a better shake and that its somehow unfair to you and yours. Anyone who has the slightest concept of history ought to be able to recognize how absurd it is to hear someone complaining about how the Indians have gotten favorable treatment.

If you have a problem with Indian sovereignty then you should get yourself a Constitution more to your liking. Good luck.
141 posted on 10/30/2003 5:00:15 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
No. Only on location because it is assumed that the person you are voting for will represent you.

However no matter where you live the tribal representative can not represent you if you are not a member of the tribe. He can't, it isn't possible. And since he can not represent you then you may not vote for him anymore then I can vote for a representative from another state.

142 posted on 10/30/2003 6:47:06 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (There's enough guilt in the world to go around without grabbing for more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
He shoots...he scores. : )
143 posted on 10/30/2003 11:33:00 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (It's all fun and games until somebody gets hurt. (Then, it's hilarious!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: CSM; Chad Fairbanks
In fairness to Gov. Pataki (R), he claims today that he vetoed the taxation of reservation sales but that he is forced to uphold the law as it was passed by the State Assembly controlled by the Demorats.
144 posted on 10/31/2003 2:59:31 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
The Assembly may be controlled by Democrats, but what of the Senate? The NY Senate is allegedly controlled by the GOP. So far, I have seen no evidence that any actual Republicans are currently in the NY Senate. RINOs? Yes. Republicans? WHERE ARE THEY??

Regards,
145 posted on 10/31/2003 5:13:12 PM PST by VermiciousKnid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
"Hey, if you are free to make assumptions, then so am I."

I was not aware that I made any assumptions about you. Cite, please.
146 posted on 11/01/2003 2:04:00 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
So I gather your answer is yes, you are an affirmative action supporter, and you support a racial spoils system. Pathetic.
147 posted on 11/01/2003 2:09:23 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
So I gather your answer is yes, you are an affirmative action supporter, and you support a racial spoils system. Pathetic.

Go beat on your straw man somewhere else. If you can't recognize the difference between constitutional treaty obligations and affirmative action then you have hopelessly brainwashed yourself.
148 posted on 11/01/2003 2:56:19 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Well, here is a pretty big assumption you have made -

Yeah, Indians have been leading the fight for our Constitutional freedoms, all right! It seems to me that the only time Indians as a group are interested in the Constitution is when their treaty rights are at stake, and to hell with that document otherwise.

But hey, whatever...

149 posted on 11/01/2003 2:59:27 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (The Truth is to see The Gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Gee, I guess I don't understand the difference between unconstitutional affirmative action and a treaty that violates the same equal protection rights owed to each of us under that same document. Maybe you could explain it to me.

Congress has the right to make treaties, I agree. But it's high time to "renegotiate" those that discriminate against certain people on the basis of their ethnicity.

You sound like you are hopeless brainwashed; "Indians good, whitey bad." Just keep repeating....
150 posted on 11/02/2003 4:22:55 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Exactly, Chad...whatever. Treaty rights uber alles, and to hell with the rest of the Constitution, as long as we can continue to build casinos wherever we please!
151 posted on 11/02/2003 4:24:52 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
It's time the Indian Nation, whether in NY or elsewhere, stopped pretending they are not part of American society.

After all, the Indians are perfectly able to enjoy the bounty and protection offered by American society, by the American military, and they should be willing to pay taxes the same as everyone else.

If the Indians were still clinging to their old ways, living out in the country in a teepee and eating buffalo as a means of rejecting United States sovereignty, then maybe I could understand them trying to remain separate.

But this treaty business is simply a charade, an effort to keep all the casino profits and tobacco profits that, if they were any other ethnicity, they would have to pay.

152 posted on 11/02/2003 4:33:09 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
No, see, the ENTIRE constitution is important, not just the parts YOU happen to agree with.

So get over it already.
153 posted on 11/02/2003 4:36:00 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (The Truth is to see The Gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Maybe you could explain it to me.

I'd have better luck explaining it to a brick wall.
154 posted on 11/02/2003 4:39:00 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Yes, that's exactly my point...maybe if Indians as a group stood up for the parts of the Constitution that don't directly affect their pocketbooks, they'd get a little more sympathy for the state of their treaty rights.

But they don't, so it appears as if the only concern that Indians have for the Constitution revolves around MONEY, and most people don't have a lot of respect for such an unprincipled stance.
155 posted on 11/02/2003 4:42:20 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Gee, guess that means you CAN'T explain it. I thought as much!
156 posted on 11/02/2003 4:42:51 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
It's quite odd to see "conservatives" arguing against tribal sovereignty on the grounds that Indians don't pay enough taxes, isn't it?
157 posted on 11/02/2003 4:45:40 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Yes, that's exactly my point...maybe if Indians as a group stood up for the parts of the Constitution that don't directly affect their pocketbooks, they'd get a little more sympathy for the state of their treaty rights.

Bulls**t. The states have been trying to destroy treaty rights for over 100 years - all easily documented and verifiable. So that doesn't fly. Nice try, though.

But they don't, so it appears as if the only concern that Indians have for the Constitution revolves around MONEY, and most people don't have a lot of respect for such an unprincipled stance.

You sure make a lot of assumptions, and they all appear to be based on ignorance and hatred. It doesn't revolve around money, it revolves around survival of a people. But, you wouldn't understand. AS I said: Ignorance.

158 posted on 11/02/2003 4:45:55 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (The Truth is to see The Gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Yes. Yes it is.
159 posted on 11/02/2003 4:46:14 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (The Truth is to see The Gift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: dyno35; Chad Fairbanks; Arkinsaw
"It's time the Indian Nation, whether in NY or elsewhere, stopped pretending they are not part of American society.

After all, the Indians are perfectly able to enjoy the bounty and protection offered by American society, by the American military, and they should be willing to pay taxes the same as everyone else.

If the Indians were still clinging to their old ways, living out in the country in a teepee and eating buffalo as a means of rejecting United States sovereignty, then maybe I could understand them trying to remain separate.

But this treaty business is simply a charade, an effort to keep all the casino profits and tobacco profits that, if they were any other ethnicity, they would have to pay. "


Exactly. This is what we've all been trying to explain to Arkinsaw and Fairbanks, but they Just Don't Get It. It's all about money, and not about anything else. It's about whining, attempting to make Euro-Americans feel guilty about the fact that we won the wars and conquered the land.
160 posted on 11/02/2003 4:46:17 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson