Skip to comments.
War shuts borders, and this is war
New York Daily News ^
| October 27, 2003
| Stanley Crouch
Posted on 10/27/2003 2:15:02 AM PST by sarcasm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2003 2:15:02 AM PST
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
Stanley Crouch ping!
2
posted on
10/27/2003 2:28:19 AM PST
by
jocon307
(Proud Member - VRWC!)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: sarcasm
The author is correct, we are at war.
We have not declared it so, the enemy has.
4
posted on
10/27/2003 3:18:36 AM PST
by
tet68
(multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
To: Futenma33
How long before the PC media mafia has him fired, investigated, and turned out in the street? I'm sure they'll try their best.
5
posted on
10/27/2003 3:21:25 AM PST
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: All
The leftist pukes who push "cultural relativism," "social justice," etc. are of the same ilk as the socialist scum who murdered at least 100 million of their fellow citizens last century.
They are filth and deserve the same fate as their victims. We owe them.
Now on to the immediate problem.
We also need to understand that the American Muslim community has been of virtually no help at all in our war against urban terrorism.
I got just two words. Internment camps.
I noticed that the employee of the newspaper brings up the "evil" Southern redneck. The Society of Professional "Journalists" guidelines pleads that no member use pejorative words with Muslim or Islam.
But, if a member absolutely must, then the member is strongly encouraged to include one or more examples of American "terrorists" such as anti-abortion groups, rednecks, etc. To wit, their Oct., 2001 National Convention in Seattle, published guidelines. Number 5: When writing about terrorism, remember to include white supremacist, radical anti-abortionists and other groups with a history of such activity. diversity_profiling.asp on their web site.
This of course is news management and not reporting. It sucks and is one reason mainstream "journalists" suck.
I don't know this newspaper employee's politics but he did not go far enough. Internment camps.
To: sarcasm
We're not really at war, or we wouldn't still be dealing with this cr*p.
I have believed for some time that we're going to have to lose a city before Americans will really believe we're at war. And once that happens, which given enough time is almost inevitable, the PCers will suddenly become very, very quiet.
7
posted on
10/27/2003 4:32:26 AM PST
by
Restorer
(Never let schooling interfere with your education.)
To: jocon307
I have been writing for a while in this space that I believe we should have a moratorium on immigration from anywhere in the Islamic world Makes more sense then O'Reilly's or Buchanan's idiotic suggestions on immigration.
8
posted on
10/27/2003 7:01:12 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: Restorer
we're going to have to lose a city before Americans will really believe we're at warI think you're being too optimistic.
One city gone would merely interfere with the sheeples TV watching patterns for a day or two.
Most of them have already forgotten 9/11.
9
posted on
10/27/2003 7:11:09 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Proud member: "Old Crow and White Lightning Association" aka "MA power & light")
To: ASA Vet
I disagree. The problem with 9/11 is that Bush has been too effective at fighting terrorists. Thus people have been allowed to subconciously think of 9/11 as an event, like an earthquake, not part of a process, like a war being waged against us.
Oddly enough, successes for the terrorists will brings their descturcion closer, while their ongoing failure to succeed in their attacks is actually a victory for them.
This is because their only real military asset is our reluctance to pull the plug of niceness and PC on them. Losing an American (or probably even a European) city would result in the immediate, permanent opening of a large, economy size can of whup*ss, followed shortly after by their annhilation.
10
posted on
10/27/2003 7:43:15 AM PST
by
Restorer
(Never let schooling interfere with your education.)
To: Restorer
I sure would prefer you to be correct.
The sheeple I work with on a daily basis have
assigned blame for everything on the evil Bush,
his father, and rich folks after oil.
11
posted on
10/27/2003 8:06:35 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Proud member: "Old Crow and White Lightning Association" aka "MA power & light")
To: sarcasm
BTTT
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
13
posted on
10/28/2003 5:01:54 AM PST
by
SJackson
To: WilliamofCarmichael
I got just two words. Internment camps
Who do you purpose putting in them?
14
posted on
10/28/2003 6:03:42 AM PST
by
Valin
(A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject)
To: aculeus
Buchanan wants a moratorium of Muslim immigrants.
He just looks at the larger picture as well.
15
posted on
10/28/2003 9:08:55 AM PST
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: sarcasm; Futenma33
Stanley Crouch can handle critics.
16
posted on
10/28/2003 9:53:01 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: tet68
We're going to find out, sooner or later,If Abdul will pray, to a smoking crater.
17
posted on
10/28/2003 9:54:26 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Internment camps for whom?
18
posted on
10/28/2003 10:00:34 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
To: Valin; Protagoras
Re: Who to send to camp for the duration of the wars -- wars, as in against radical Islam attacks
and the home-grown attacks on our culture and heritage.
In the early 1970s I became convinced that traditional political debate was impossible with the New Left. They soon seized the Democrat party and most traditional, patriotic Party leaders fled under a hail of "neo-conservatives!" epithets.
Since then others have joined the leftist swine's assault on our heritage and culture. I've listened to almost four decades of America is the "root cause" of the world's problems. I've watched our rights disappear and our sovereignty weakened.
Who would I put into the internment camps? Whoever the Bush administration, with the advice of Americans like Rumsfeld and Lt. Gen. Boykin, has the guts to confront.
Sadly, it will take more attacks on our sovereignty and more 9/11s however because "all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
I spit on America's domestic enemies' "rights." Abolish their "rights." Abolish what we are "accustomed" to in our universities, mainstream media, foundations, Islamists groups, and more -- all enemies of our heritage and culture. They have no rights under our Constitution.
If necessary and except for the Second Amendment put the Constitution on the shelf in a safe place and take care of business. It's happened before during war time and it's been restored.
WE'VE LOST MORE RIGHTS -- SPEECH, PROPERTY AND PERSONAL PROTECTION -- DURING PEACETIME DUE TO THE LEFTIST SWINE THAN DURING ANY WARTIME.
The short answer is, anyone who will not sign a loyalty oath.
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Who would I put into the internment camps? Whoever the Bush administration, with the advice of Americans like Rumsfeld and Lt. Gen. Boykin, has the guts to confront.The short answer is, anyone who will not sign a loyalty oath.
You are seriously deranged. And you are clearly worse than any enemy you perceive.
I would fight you to the death before any foreign enemy.
20
posted on
10/28/2003 8:16:09 PM PST
by
Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson