Posted on 10/24/2003 7:04:26 AM PDT by Mia T
YOO-HOO! ALAN COLMES
The clintons must answer the rape allegation(s)
because the evidence that they are serial predators is overwhelming.
Alan Colmes, the liberal half of Fox News Channel's top-rated debate show "Hannity & Colmes," has some advice for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton and her husband: Pay no attention to those pesky sexual assault allegations leveled against Mr. Clinton by an array of different women.
Colmes, whose new book, "Red, White and Liberal," hits bookstores on Tuesday, tells NewsMax that there's no reason that either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton should respond, for instance, to Juanita Broaddrick's claim that she was attacked, brutalized and violated by Mr. Clinton in a Little Rock hotel room 25 years ago.
"Why should he dignify [the allegation with a response]? Why should she dignify it?" he argues....
At least one well-placed observer agrees with the liberal talk host.
"Alan Colmes knows that facts and evidence count for more than ideological and personal attacks. ... That makes his book a must read for people all across the political spectrum," wrote Bill Clinton in a dust jacket blurb for Colmes' book.
Colmes: Clintons Should Ignore Sexual Assault Allegations |
|
bill clinton and the little missus must "dignify" the Broaddrick rape "allegation" with a response simply because all the evidence--and there is plenty of it--empirical, inferential, much of it contemporaneous ...
thanx to Wolverine for the audio EPILOGUE: (ADDITIONAL AUDIO) Hear Christopher Shays: "The bottom line: HE DID RAPE BROADDRICK."
--confirms that they--both of them-- in fact did it. Simply put, the clintons are demonstrable serial predators. Conversely, the clintons would be demanding the release of the Ford Building evidence if it were in fact exculpatory. |
hillary talks: ON STANDIN' BY MY MAN
by Mia T, 10.19.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
A risible and repulsive result;
While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
In the end,
We will have set apart clinton as the hero
Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
yet not even the punch line.
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.
|
The Real Danger of a Fake President:
They say that the clear focus of American policy was to discourage the state sponsorship of terrorism. So persuading Khartoum to expel Bin Laden was in itself counted as a clear victory. The administration was "delighted".
Bin Laden took off from Khartoum on May 18 in a chartered C-130 plane with 150 of his followers, including his wives. He was bound for Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan. On the way the plane refuelled in the Gulf state of Qatar, which has friendly relations with Washington, but he was allowed to proceed unhindered.
Barely a month later, on June 25, a 5,000lb truck bomb ripped apart the front of Khobar Towers, a US military housing complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The explosion killed 19 American servicemen. Bin Laden was immediately suspected...
bill clinton, State of Union Speech, January 27, 2000
Among the comments clinton made in presence of Secret Service agents:
After the Monica Lewinsky story broke, however, clinton toned down his rhetoric and behavior in front of his Secret Service agents, but those who guarded the president say enough of them saw and heard things which could be damaging to clinton.
Turnover In clinton's Secret Service Detail 'Highest That Anyone Can Remember'
Why does the press continue to ignore the Juanita Broaddrick story?
Richard Gere stunned fellow liberals Monday by suggesting that President Bush is doing a better job of fighting AIDS than President Bill Clinton did.
Introduced by Sharon Stone at a fund-raiser at Cipriani 42nd Street for the American Foundation for AIDS Research, the "Chicago" star hailed Bush for his State of the Union proposal to contribute $15 billion toward the AIDS battle in Africa and the Caribbean. Gere then addressed the track record of Bush's predecessor in the White House.
"I'm sorry, Sen. [Hillary] Clinton, but your husband did nothing about AIDS for eight years," Gere said.
GERE TAKES ON BILL, NY Daily News | 2/5/03
The placebo effect immediately came to mind as I listened to Shelby Steele, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution,debunk the following pernicious spin intended to save clinton.
To wit: A proven felon and utter reprobate can remain president; clinton can be a failed human being but a good president.
The error in these statements arises, says Steele, from the belief that virtuousness is separate from personal responsibility so that one's virtuousness as an individual is determined by one's political positions on issues rather than on whether or not in one's personal life there is a consistency and a responsibility.
Steele's contention is that this compartmentalization, rather than being the amazing advantage the clintons would have us believe, in fact, spills toxicity into, corrupts, the culture.
If mere identification with good policies is what makes one virtuous then those policies become, what Steele calls, iconographic, that is to say they just represent virtuousness. They don't necessarily do virtuous things.
If clinton's semantic parsing strips meaning from our words, clinton's iconographic policies strip meaning from our society, systematically deconstructing our society as a democracy. . .
I would take Shelby Steele's thesis one step further. I maintain that iconographic policy functions like a placebo, producing a real, physiological and social effects.
The placebo effect is, after all, the brain's triumph over reality. Expectation alone can produce powerful physiological results. The placebo effect was, at one time, an evolutionary advantage: act now, think later
bill clinton is the paradigmatic Placebo President. Placebo is Latin for "I shall please." And please he does doling out sham treatments, iconographs, with abandon. To please, to placate, to numb, to deflect. Ultimately to showcase his imagined virtue. Or to confute his genuine vice.
clinton will dispense sugar pills (or bombs) at the drop of a high-heeled shoe... or at the hint of high treason...
clinton's charlatanry mimics that of primitive medicine. Through the 1940s, doctors had little effective medicine to offer so they deliberately attempted to induce the placebo response.
The efficaciousness of today's medicines does not diminish the power of the placebo. A recent review of placebo-controlled studies found that placebos and genuine treatments are often equally effective. If you expect to get better, you will.
Which brings me back to the original question: Can clinton be a failed human being but a good president?
Clearly he cannot. These two propositions are mutually exclusive. clinton's fundamental failure is a complete lack of integrity. He has violated his covenant with the American people.
Because clinton has destroyed his moral authority as a leader, he can no longer function even as a quack; the placebo effect is gone.
And so the Placebo President must now go, too.
September 11 changed a lot of things for me, Bill [O'Reilly]. I will say this, before September 11, I was definitely mildly myopic in terms of my political agenda. If you were Democrat you were probably right, and if you were a Republican you were probably wrong. Everything changed for me that day...
My entire worldview changed. If you would have told me September 9 that I would have been at the world series game filming George Bush throwing out the first pitch with my 6-year-old son crying, I never would have believed you, but I was. Because my whole worldview changed.
The boot in the face, the brute
Brute heart of a brute like you.
"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era."
Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
|
thx to alan colmes, too...
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
Q ERTY3PREDATORSBUMP
|
It must be a very bad trip with that many pictures of Hillary! in it.
If Clinton violently raped someone 20 years ago, he's still a violent rapist...it's not something you can undo. Fact is, there are at least 2-3 other women who claim Clinton forced himself on them, including a classmate of his when he was at Oxford and a Miss America pageant contestant. I'm not sure how you cannot take this seriously, it's further evidence of what a huge mistake it was to have this SEXUAL PREDATOR serve two terms as POTUS.
FReegards...MUD
So, naturally, the question arises, why then did she bring it out at all? Why not continue to live in fear? All I can guess is that living in continual fear brings its own kind of torture. At some point an individual must decide if they can continue doing that, or try to purge those memories and feelings through some kind of cleansing, which often involves revelation of the truth to others around you. Everyone has their limit in this regard, and my guess is that Juanita reached hers, and had to try to break free of the past and purge those demons as best she could.
Just my guess playing amateur psychologist.
And nevertheless a lot of people -- including, I regret to say, a lot of people on this site -- seem strangely inclined to dismiss the evidence against Kobe Bryant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.