Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it Bush vs. Dean? Pat Buchanan says Dubya's looking good, Democrats 'could face a wipeout
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, October 21, 2003 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 10/21/2003 2:01:05 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

With an uptick in his approval rating to 56 percent – higher than Reagan at this point in his presidency – George W. Bush seems to have weathered his summer squall and to be well-positioned to do what his father failed to do: Win a second term.

The resurgence in the president's ratings appears due to two factors: the California recall election that riveted the nation – and in which the face of the Democratic Party was that of Gray Davis, and of the GOP that of Arnold. Second, the bull market, with the Dow nearing 10,000 again.

If Wall Street remains the lead indicator it has usually been – a predictor of what is to come in the economy six to 12 months out – Bush could be presiding over good times in 2004.

Moreover, with the dollar sinking, aiding U.S. exports, with most Bush tax cuts taking effect before November '04, with Alan Greenspan gunning the money supply and with a $550 billion deficit pumping out cash, the economy has all the steroids it needs for an Olympic performance in 2004.

Then there is Iraq, about which a consensus seems to be emerging. Those who opposed the war do not want to cut and run and leave Iraq to chaos and civil war. Those who supported the war do not want to stay on forever and fight an Iraqi intifada.

The consensus appears to be this: America will not send fresh new divisions to fight a 5- or 10-year war. Iraq will be helped onto its feet and power transferred as soon as possible, so Iraqis themselves can take responsibility for their own independence. And then, the Americans go home.

But if the United States is losing half a dozen soldiers a week with scores wounded in October of next year, and Bush comes back to Congress for another $87 billion, "Bush's War" will be the issue of 2004. Especially with the Democratic nominee likely to be Howard Dean of Vermont.

Here is another reason to bet on Bush. Though badly cut up by rivals over the summer, Dean still runs ahead of Rep. Gephardt in Iowa and of Sen. Kerry in New Hampshire, with summer sensation Gen. Wesley Clark trailing badly in both states. And we are only three months away from the voting.

During the summer, Gephardt failed to win the endorsement of the AFL-CIO. Clark has had problems both with message and organization, and was beaten up in the last debate. And Kerry just got some very bad news from a Granite State Poll.

Last winter, he led Dean 39 percent to 11 percent in that New Hampshire survey of likely Democratic voters. Now, Dean leads Kerry 30 percent to 17 percent, a turnaround of 42 points. Where 65 percent of likely voters had a positive image of Kerry as of last winter, only half that number do today. Add to this that Dean led all other Democrats in fund raising in the third quarter, and it is becoming difficult to see just who is going to stop the anti-war ex-governor.

The anti-Dean vote may be the majority inside the Democratic Party. But it is divided among Gephardt, Kerry, Clark and Sens. Joe Lieberman and John Edwards, with no sign any of the five can pull it together before Dean begins rolling up victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, and pulling away. One Democrat could step in at this late hour, stop Howard Dean and seize the nomination. But she is reluctant.

If, however, Dean is nominated, he will be an anti-war candidate of a party most of whose national leaders – Gephardt, Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman, Daschle, Clinton – voted for war. The last Democrat to take so vivid an anti-war stand was George McGovern in 1972.

Second, Dean's call for repeal of the Bush tax cuts will make him, for the purposes of GOP campaign commercials, the pro-tax candidate. Lieberman is already on tape predicting a "Dean Depression." Democrats have not nominated a tax-raiser since Walter Mondale in 1984, and like McGovern, he, too, lost 49 states.

Third, Dean's support of civil unions for homosexuals in Vermont will make "gay" marriage, and the GOP constitutional amendment restricting marriage to a man and woman, the social issue of 2004.

In 1972, Nixon ran against McGovern as the candidate, in Sen. Hugh Scott's phrase, of "acid, amnesty and abortion." If Bush and Karl Rove, using the $170 million they plan to raise by spring, can paint Dean as pro-homosexual weddings, pro-hiking taxes and "soft on Saddam," Dean and the Democrats could face a wipeout.

Nothing is certain in politics. Few predicted the Bush swoon of last summer. And the economy could go into that "double-dip" recession some predict. But as of now, it looks like "Four More Years!" for GWB.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; gwb2004; invincible; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Tuesday, October 21, 2003

Quote of the Day by dirtboy

1 posted on 10/21/2003 2:01:05 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The biggest reason is that Howard Dean is a radical leftist wacko who scares the bejesus out of Americans when they think about his national defenseless policies.
2 posted on 10/21/2003 2:11:49 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

3 posted on 10/21/2003 2:14:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator; JohnHuang2
If the Rats had any sense, they'd nominate Richard Gephardt - and then hope the economy stays in the tank.
4 posted on 10/21/2003 2:14:34 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator; JohnHuang2
but the Rats DON'T have any sense, and the economy is steadily improving..
5 posted on 10/21/2003 2:15:09 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
and the economy is steadily improving..

Something that deeply, deeply saddens me.

6 posted on 10/21/2003 2:17:50 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I actually think Gephardt or Lieberman would have the best shot at winning. However, the leftist hard core "hate America" crowd will never nominate either of them.
7 posted on 10/21/2003 2:18:21 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Mirror, Mirror, on the wall,
Who's the most promising Dem of all?"

"ALL dwarves and witches Truth will rout,
And Snow White Bush will wipe them out!"


8 posted on 10/21/2003 2:20:00 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
lol!
9 posted on 10/21/2003 2:21:03 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I actually think Gephardt or Lieberman would have the best shot at winning.

Lieberman has too many flips on his views. Gephardt's pro-labor record might serve him well at this juncture.

10 posted on 10/21/2003 2:22:31 AM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

11 posted on 10/21/2003 2:42:20 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Good one!
12 posted on 10/21/2003 3:51:30 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Democrats have not nominated a tax-raiser since Walter Mondale in 1984, and like McGovern, he, too, lost 49 states.

Well, maybe Dean could make history and go for 50. It took Fritz Mondale 18 years (1984-2002) to acheive this milestone.

13 posted on 10/21/2003 4:11:49 AM PDT by Rubber Duck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Whichever party turns its back on us disgusting moderates will lose.
14 posted on 10/21/2003 4:17:01 AM PDT by tkathy (The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
"Whichever party turns its back on us disgusting moderates will lose."

Well I plan on helping the democrats disgust it's moderates by voting for Dean in the primary. In fact I've joined the faction of right wingers who have sent Dean $25 bucks hoping he will win their nomination.
Personally I find moderates unable to wrap themselves around any political philosophy. It's kind of wishy-washy....but hey, what do I know...I'm a Libertarian who regularly casts a pragmatic vote for the lesser evil.

15 posted on 10/21/2003 5:23:55 AM PDT by Katya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Those who are hoping for Dean to be the Democratic nominee should remember that, from time to time, the Democrats win the White House. I would much rather that the Dems nominate Gephardt or Lieberman, the best of their current bad lot, than hope for a blowout against Dean next year. The consequences of a Dean presidency would be catastrophic, while a Gephardt or Lieberman presidency would merely be unpleasant.
16 posted on 10/21/2003 5:39:21 AM PDT by jalisco555 (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Savage Beast, he's a poet and don't know it.
You can tell by the feet...they're looongfellows.
17 posted on 10/21/2003 6:14:53 AM PDT by Valin (A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Katya
Not me, I support Carol Mosley Braun.
As she's both a woman and a "person of color" allowing me to be PC on two fronts.
http://www.carolforpresident.com/content.php?page=home

All you Dean supporters are nothing but sexist racists!




Oct. is National Sarcastics' Awareness Month.

18 posted on 10/21/2003 6:21:45 AM PDT by Valin (A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Any of them would be horrific, but Dean is the worst of the lot.

You can't even get good Republicans out of Vermont.
19 posted on 10/21/2003 6:29:36 AM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A good look at this last 100 years of Presidential politics shows how hard it is to win re-election as a President. In fact, it has only been done by Wilson, FDR, Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan and Clinton since 1900. Eisenhower and Clinton were helped along by economic prosperity, Wilson, FDR and Nixon were wartime Presidents, and Reagan had decent economic news (which he crafted his first term) and then brought the Cold War to a head.

G.W. Bush has held off a long term recession it appears and is currently embroiled in this War on Terror. Historically, things look pretty good for him. If the unemployment numbers pick up, the Democrats won't have the economy, jobs, or lack of patriotism to use as a national theme against him. They will have to be against the war, against immigration, or against him personally. The first won't sit well with moderates, the second won't sit well with their base, and the third can't be done unless G.W. Bush gives them a scandal to lock onto.

Bush may not be made of teflon, or have picked up a "Slick Willy" moniker, but as long as he keeps his administration (and himself personally) scandal free, the Dems are going to have some well catered pity parties come next November.

20 posted on 10/21/2003 6:44:13 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson