Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigrants may be key to Bush victory
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 10-18-03 | MORTON KONDRACKE

Posted on 10/18/2003 12:29:25 PM PDT by JustPiper

If the 2004 election is another squeaker, President Bush could lose it because he failed to follow through on his promise to help undocumented Hispanic immigrants gain legal status.

Polls indicate that Latino voters regard immigration as a litmus test issue -- the way African Americans do civil rights, one expert said -- and Bush shows signs of losing once-promising support.

Meantime, Democratic presidential candidates and members of Congress -- with some assistance from Republicans -- are moving to seize the immigration issue that Bush so far has dropped.

Bush can recoup -- and some GOP strategists say he must -- by showing renewed interest (or even taking leadership) to help illegal immigrants get legal and secure U.S. borders at the same time.

Bush carried 35 percent of the Latino vote in 2000 after a vigorous outreach effort (and frequently speaking Spanish on the stump) -- nine percent more than GOP candidate Bob Dole got in 1996.

On Sept. 6, 2001, with Mexican President Vicente Fox by his side, Bush said ''there are many in our country who are undocumented and we want to make sure their work is legal.''

After Sept. 11, 2001, homeland security concerns put a freeze on Bush's plans, and then relations with Fox soured because Mexico opposed the Iraq war. Both immigration and U.S. policy toward Latin America get constant coverage on Spanish-language television.

So this August, a New York Times/CBS poll showed that only 21 percent of Latinos would vote for Bush. And a poll for the GOP Latino Coalition showed that a generic Democrat would beat Bush by 49 percent to 30 percent.

The latest bipartisan Battleground survey showed that, of all demographic groups, Latinos showed the largest ''dropoff rate'' -- a 15 point difference between Bush's personal approval rating of 61 percent and his job performance of 46 percent.

The falloff has also hurt the GOP. In 2000, GOP congressional candidates won 34 percent of the Latino vote, according to exit polls. In 2002, it was 35 percent. But in the August Latino Coalition poll, registered voters said they'd vote Democratic 55 percent to 25 percent.

All this is despite findings that 35 percent of Latinos defined themselves as ''conservative'' and only 22 percent as ''liberal'' -- and by a whopping 53 percent to 7 percent, they said that lowering taxes was a better way to grow the economy than raising taxes.

Conducted by the GOP firm of McLaughlin and Associates, the poll found that 86.7 percent of Latinos favored a policy allowing the federal government to ''normalize the status of illegal workers in this country'' provided they have a clean record.

Moreover, 90.8 percent polled said it was ''important'' -- and 74.8 percent, ''very important'' -- that U.S. immigration laws be reformed to ''reduce illegal immigration by promoting a system which increases the legal flow of workers into this country.''

The leading Democratic presidential candidates are all in favor of plans to legalize undocumented immigrants with clean records, increase the number of work permits and visas, and reach an agreement with Mexico to strengthen border security.

In Congress, several bills have been introduced -- or will be -- to liberalize immigration rules. The most generous is a forthcoming measure being worked out by Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) allowing immigrants who have been in the country for five years, have paid taxes for three and have taken English instruction to get legal work permits.

While some Republicans are as progressive on immigration issues as most Democrats, the GOP has a significant nativist wing calling for the denial of public services to illegals.

GOP pollster Ed Geoas, who has done extensive polling on immigration, says he's convinced that Bush and White House political adviser Karl Rove are eager to take steps toward liberalization, but are waiting until homeland security and economic conditions are better.

Another key GOP strategist says, ''we have to revisit it. It's a big issue in battleground states like New Mexico and Florida.''

Bush had best not wait too long.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Massachusetts; US: Nebraska; US: New Mexico; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bush; democrats; fox; gwb2004; hagel; illegals; illegalvote; immigration; kennedy; kondracke; republicanturncoats; sellouts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Bush had best not wait too long.

He better never...

1 posted on 10/18/2003 12:29:26 PM PDT by JustPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FoxFang; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; CheneyChick; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; 4.1O dana super trac pak; ...
Ping!
2 posted on 10/18/2003 12:30:30 PM PDT by JustPiper (Curses to the Billy Goat and The Bambino !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Polls indicate that Latino voters regard immigration as a litmus test issue

I also regard [illegal] immigration as a litmus test. President Bush supports illegal immigration = I don't vote for President Bush.

3 posted on 10/18/2003 12:32:55 PM PDT by Mini-14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
If Bush is even considering illegal foreigners as his election ace in the hole, I hope he loses. What an insult to citizens and legal immigrants!
4 posted on 10/18/2003 12:35:03 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
Sad, but I agree I cannot vote for him again either
5 posted on 10/18/2003 12:36:29 PM PDT by JustPiper (Curses to the Billy Goat and The Bambino !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
An amen Bump!
6 posted on 10/18/2003 12:37:10 PM PDT by JustPiper (Curses to the Billy Goat and The Bambino !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
I also regard [illegal] immigration as a litmus test. President Bush supports illegal immigration = I don't vote for President Bush.

Ditto.

7 posted on 10/18/2003 12:38:21 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
Perhaps the RINO who wrote the article can explain why the percentage of "hispanics" voting Republican went DOWN after Reagan granted amnesty in '86. Gee, I'm sure it didn't have anything to do with these "first time voter" criminals electing Democrats because they wanted MORE freebies from the government.

Also, notice he says "on immigration, some Republicans are as progressive as some Democrats". Another jerk who thinks the GOP can win if they adopt a "me tooism" policy and parrot whatever the 'RATs say. Yeah, that worked GREAT in the 40s and 70s, didn't it?

8 posted on 10/18/2003 12:38:48 PM PDT by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
The theory that the issue of not legitimizing illegals and making it easy for them to become citizens will automatically lead to poor Hispanic support and electoral defeat didn't hold water for Arnold Schwarzenegger.

I continue to hope that most Latino's want citizenship to occur through the established process.

Prairie
9 posted on 10/18/2003 12:39:18 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
Bump....
10 posted on 10/18/2003 12:39:52 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper

11 posted on 10/18/2003 12:40:23 PM PDT by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
If the 2004 election is another squeaker, President Bush could lose it because he failed to follow through on his promise to help undocumented Hispanic immigrants gain legal status. >>>>>>>


Pres. Bush also took an OATH to up-hold all the US laws, and to work for the CITIZENS.

Anyway, in these so-called PC times, wouldn't it be a little racist to help *only* the hispanic illegals gain legal status ?? Hispanics seem to have a lot more than their share of the USA anyway, as they now get to "press 2" for spanish.

12 posted on 10/18/2003 12:43:10 PM PDT by txdoda ("Navy-brat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
"Bush had best not wait too long."

Aren't those folks ever grateful though. He left the borders open on 9/11 and they are still open. Maybe it's just time to close them to keep anymore from coming in and voting against him for not 'legalizing' them. In fact, just send all the illegals here already back home and he won't have to worry about their support -- or lack of it. And that would include the terrorists as well, of course. An idea whose time is way past due.

13 posted on 10/18/2003 12:45:16 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Hey, I think amnesty is a great idea. If, before December 31, and before they are otherwise caught, illegal aliens go to the immigration offices and give fingerprints and DNA samples and fill out identification information, then they will have until December 31 to get out of the country legally. After December 31, any illegal alien who's caught receives six months detention if not on file, but gets their fingerprints and DNA added to INS files; aliens who are already on files get five years.

Anyone else support that sort of "amnesty"?

14 posted on 10/18/2003 12:45:23 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: txdoda
Pres. Bush also took an OATH to up-hold all the US laws, and to work for the CITIZENS.

He should also consider that illegal voters vote Democrat; anything that increases the number of illegal voters will thus hurt the Republicans.

15 posted on 10/18/2003 12:46:57 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Perhaps the RINO who wrote the article....

Actually he is a Democrat. I think that explains it!

At some point, and maybe we are here now, people are going to be fed up enough with illegal's that it will cut the other way.

16 posted on 10/18/2003 12:47:55 PM PDT by Voltage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
"Immigrants may be key to Bush victory"

Did pandering to illegals help Davis in the recall???

No it didn't because Illegal Immigrants don't vote, Kondracke you ^&%^ing Moron!
17 posted on 10/18/2003 12:48:26 PM PDT by Pubbie (Vote "No" On Recall, "Yes" On Bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voltage
A Democrat who wants to "help" Bush get hispanics to vote Republican so the Republicans can win? LOL. This guy sounds like a real con artist.
18 posted on 10/18/2003 12:50:17 PM PDT by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
LOL.......You would think ANYONE wanting to secure 'the vote' might listen to the VOTERS.

According to the idiot in this article Bush/Rove and the dems are going to spend millions fighting over that BIG 15% that are for ANOTHER amnesty.
19 posted on 10/18/2003 12:52:04 PM PDT by txdoda ("Navy-brat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The number's did show it backfired for the dems, so in a way it backs Morton's article more hispanic's are still conservative
20 posted on 10/18/2003 12:55:50 PM PDT by JustPiper (Curses to the Billy Goat and The Bambino !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson