Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Never lie to me’: Bush to Daschle
The Hill ^ | 10/15/03 | Albert Eisele

Posted on 10/14/2003 6:27:34 PM PDT by Jean S

A new memoir by Minority Leader Tom Daschle says Senate Democrats were actively courting two Republicans — John McCain of Arizona and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island — as most likely to switch parties and give them control of the evenly divided Senate when Jim Jeffords of Vermont informed them he was ready to do so.

The heretofore untold sequence of events that led to Jeffords’ dramatic decision to bolt the Republican Party in May 2001 and become an Independent is disclosed for the first time in Daschle’s book, which covers the tumultuous two-year period following President Bush’s disputed election in November, 2000.

The book by the South Dakota Democrat, Like No Other Time: The 107th Congress and the Two Years That Changed America Forever, was written with co-author Michael D’Orso and is scheduled to be published next month.

The details of Jeffords’s decision, which ruptured his ties with the White House and many GOP colleagues and made Daschle majority leader, are among a number of insights Daschle provides into the inner workings of the Senate, his reaction to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and the bioterrorism attack that exposed 20 of his aides to deadly anthrax spores and caused the Hart Senate Office building to be closed for months.

Daschle also offers some harsh judgments of congressional Republicans and the Republican Party as well as veiled criticism of Vice President Al Gore and several Democratic Senate colleagues.

They include:

• His “complex and layered” relationship with the man he replaced as majority leader, Trent Lott (R-Miss.), who he said was so shocked by losing control of the Senate “that he could hardly finish a sentence” and could not accept the fact he had to share power in a 50-50 Senate.

• His admission that he initially underestimated George W. Bush and his grudging concession that he “is an undeniably effective communicator, not unlike Ronald Reagan” who “knows where he stands and is smart enough to understand what he needs to do in order to frame and express his stance on a particular subject.”

• His implicit criticism of Gore’s personality: “Al Gore’s breadth and depth of knowledge, his experience, his grasp of the issue were clearly superior [to Bush]. But people liked Bush.” However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.

• His undisguised concern about “the rabidly fierce ideology” and “crusader-like zeal” of Bush’s top advisers, including Vice President Cheney, Karl Rove, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz, among others.

• His disappointment with “moderate” Democratic colleagues such as Zell Miller of Georgia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Max Baucus of Montana, John Breaux of Louisiana, Evan Bayh of Indiana and Tom Carper of Delaware for their willingness to go along with Bush and the Republicans on key issues.

• His low opinion of his former Senate colleague, John Ashcroft (R-Mo.), whose fitness to serve as attorney general he questions because he has “openly and defiantly used the power of his positions to advance his right-wing ideology.”

• His disdain for former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) who he said was bent on “demonizing” Democrats and portraying them as not only wrong or misguided but “evil,” and his scathing criticism of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), whom he accused of ruling “by fear, by discouraging any form of dissent among his membership, and by punishing those who dare to disagree.”

• His revelation that he intended to run for president himself in 2004 until he decided, after enduring “excruciating” inner turmoil, that he did not want to risk giving up his Senate seat and could not run for president and lead his caucus “in a new Senate that had an aggressive and extremely empowered Republican majority.”

Daschle also recounts his meeting with President-elect Bush in his Capitol office in January 2001.

“Until then, I never noticed his Texas swagger,” Daschle writes. “Perhaps it was the fact that in order to enter my suite in the Capitol, you actually need to pass through a set of swinging saloon-style doors. The combination of Bush’s confident strut, his self-assured manner, and those saloon doors swinging shut behind him all combined to create an image of a new sheriff in town. Which, in essence, he was.”

Nevertheless, Daschle confesses that he was troubled when Bush, after expressing the hope that they could work together as closely as Bush had with Bob Bullock, his Democratic lieutenant governor in Texas, said, “I hope you’ll never lie to me.”

“That statement caught me up short. What an unusual concern to express in such a meeting.… I’ve often wondered since then what George Bush might have been told about me that would make him begin this conversation, this relationship, from an implied position of mistrust.”

The catalyst for Jeffords’ decision in May 2001 was a meeting in late March between him and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Daschle writes.

The two men met in Dodd’s office on a Friday afternoon in late March “to discuss an amendment on child care. But they wound up talking about Jim’s friction with Bush and with the Republican leadership, Daschle writes. “At one point in the conversation, Jim wondered aloud if there was any room left for him in the Republican Party.”

“Chris could hardly stay in his seat,” Daschle recounts. “As soon as Jim left, Chris got on the phone and tracked me down in my office. ‘I think there’s something going on here,’ Chris said. ‘I think we really need to begin talking to him.”

Dodd’s phone call precipitated a carefully orchestrated behind-the-scenes effort by Daschle and other Democrats, including Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, to persuade Jeffords to defect. The effort was aided by White House snubs of Jeffords and by fellow Republicans, notably Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Pete Domenici of New Mexico, who undercut his authority as chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

Daschle believes that the key precipitating event occurred when Budget Committee Chairman Domenici informed him in early May that there was nothing for special education in the president’s education bill.

“That’s when I started making personal overtures, calling Jim, commiserating with him, and letting him know we were willing to talk whenever he was,” Daschle writes. “He came by my office a couple of times for brief chats … but we were very careful about that. I never came near him on the Senate floor itself or, for that matter, in any location where the press or Republican members might see us.”

Then, on the evening of Monday, May 14, Assistant Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada told Daschle that Jeffords wanted to meet with them in his hideaway office in the Capitol the next morning.

“It was 7 a.m. when Harry and I arrived at Jim’s hideaway that Tuesday morning, and Jim got right down to business. he had three primary concerns, and they could be summarized as: cows, committees and co-workers.”

Daschle agreed to oppose efforts to eliminate the government’s dairy policy and Reid volunteered to step aside so Jeffords could become chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and to let him bring along all his staffers.

Daschle and Reid and their aides watched on television two days later as Jeffords announce his decision in Vermont, without knowing for certain what he would do.

“When Jim reached the point in his speech where he said, ‘I will make this change and will caucus with the Democrats for organization purposes …,’ the room exploded with cheers. You could hear us out in the halls.”


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: daschle; dasshole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Lancey Howard
Harry Reid and Jim Jeffords?? Ewwwww....

What ewwww, I was gonna say they answer children's letters to Santa in those hidden offices. What were you thinking????

41 posted on 10/14/2003 7:23:16 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
"However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election."

Yeah. He didn't go beyond the US Supreme Court!!!! / sarcasm.

42 posted on 10/14/2003 7:24:56 PM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Hmm....
Nevertheless, Daschle confesses that he was troubled when Bush, after expressing the hope that they could work together as closely as Bush had with Bob Bullock, his Democratic lieutenant governor in Texas, said, “I hope you’ll never lie to me.”

“That statement caught me up short. What an unusual concern to express in such a meeting.… I’ve often wondered since then what George Bush might have been told about me that would make him begin this conversation, this relationship, from an implied position of mistrust.”
maybe this perhaps?
A new memoir by Minority Leader Tom Daschle says Senate Democrats were actively courting two Republicans — John McCain of Arizona and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island — as most likely to switch parties and give them control of the evenly divided Senate when Jim Jeffords of Vermont informed them he was ready to do so.

43 posted on 10/14/2003 7:25:37 PM PDT by jmcclain19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
"However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election".

...Might this be the ultimate in revisionist history? Twenty years from now will our children be taught this in school? Listen closely children and I will tell you the story of how George Bush stole the election and Al Gore nobly and steadfastly refused to challenge the results - for the good of the country. Makes me wanna puke!
44 posted on 10/14/2003 7:26:26 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Dasshole always reminds me, that our Congress still has far too many dangerous fools in place..
He is the poster boy for the Peter Principal..

When you look at the quality of Democrat Senators - you get some idea of why many in the world regard the United States as a backward and evil empire....

Think about that for a moment"
Dasshole, Kennedy, Clinton, Schumer, Byrd, Hollings, Levin, Edwards, Graham, etc......

Semper Fi

45 posted on 10/14/2003 7:26:34 PM PDT by river rat (War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You have to more than laugh, you have to read between the lines and find a man (Daschle) so detracted from the real world that he finds Bush's statement offensive.

It wasn't that Bush had heard something about him (other than being able to read the newspapers or watch TV in which Tom lied all the time), it was simply a plain spoken man, being the President, telling a collegue that he doesn't like being lied to, so don't do it and we'll get along.

Sounds like typical Texas talk to me. But then Daschle has lived in DC for so long, how would he know?
46 posted on 10/14/2003 7:26:47 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Wake Up America, You're Dreaming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: river rat
"Dasshole, Kennedy, Clinton, Schumer, Byrd, Hollings, Levin, Edwards, Graham, etc"


...and that is one BIG "etc"
47 posted on 10/14/2003 7:29:07 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Byrd isn't the only dumass in W.Va. Did anyone else hear Rockefeller talking about his recent trip to Iraq? He spouted lie after lie about how George Bush misled everyone in going to war with Iraq. All of the lies have been repeatedly refuted and yet democrats continue to spew them. They seem to think that if you tell the same old lies often enough people will believe them.
48 posted on 10/14/2003 7:36:39 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Thud
FYI
49 posted on 10/14/2003 7:37:03 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Daschole books says "However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election."

What does he think Gore did in Florida? Act like a statesman? Accept the loss with dignity and character?

How is it that people as delusional as Daschole and as spineless as Lott get to be Senate majority leader in the greatest nation on earth?

50 posted on 10/14/2003 7:37:33 PM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Dodd’s phone call precipitated a carefully orchestrated behind-the-scenes effort by Daschle and other Democrats, including Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, to persuade Jeffords to defect.

He came by my office a couple of times for brief chats … but we were very careful about that. I never came near him on the Senate floor itself or, for that matter, in any location where the press or Republican members might see us.

“It was 7 a.m. when Harry and I arrived at Jim’s hideaway that Tuesday morning, and Jim got right down to business.

And he wonders why Bush might think he would lie to him. Too bad Daschle wasn't spending more time reading intelligence reports before September 11 rather than running covert operations in the Senate.

51 posted on 10/14/2003 7:39:36 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
...he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election...

Hello? What color is the sky on your world, Dasshole?

Here on Earth, Gore challenged the results of the 2000 election for weeks until he finally got slapped down by the Supreme Court.

52 posted on 10/14/2003 7:42:22 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
"Geez, this is total drivel. Which tells me Daschle must have actually wrote it since it's his psychotic style."

It also has the sound of a "let it all hang out, I did it my way" memorium.

Could it be that the book's release will be a prelude to Little Tommy's announcing his retirement?

If so, good riddance!

53 posted on 10/14/2003 7:43:17 PM PDT by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
What is this "hideaway office" thing?

The Senior Senators (and some otherwise influential ones) have them. They are lounges more than offices; not listed in any official directory so you can't find one unless you are invited.
They've historically been used for cocktail parties and assignations of any type, but you can't believe the worst of any Senator just because they have one. Some of them use theirs to take a nap when they have to be on the Hill for a long time, and others use theirs for private parties when they are trying to court influence.
And of course, others use them for everything you can imagine.

54 posted on 10/14/2003 7:48:19 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
How is it that people as delusional as Daschole and as spineless as Lott get to be Senate majority leader in the greatest nation on earth?

By putting down members of their own party who disagree with them even more ruthlessly than they deal with the other party.

55 posted on 10/14/2003 7:49:38 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Wright had a book???

(I remember being in the barber shop when he was coming in for a haircut years ago. I told the stylist to ask him if he wanted his eyebrows trimmed. I just died laughing right there in front of him when I heard her ask! That was in between reading excerpts out loud from the Conservative Digest article at the time, "What You Should Know About House Speaker, Jim Wright")
56 posted on 10/14/2003 7:50:14 PM PDT by GOP_Thug_Mom (ad majorem dei gloriam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Does every Senator have a "hideaway office", and if so, what for??

The most famous "hideaway office" belonged to LBJ when he was Majority Leader. His womainizing didn't get publicized as much as JFK or Bubba but it happened.

57 posted on 10/14/2003 7:52:39 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
• His “complex and layered” relationship with the man he replaced as majority leader, Trent Lott (R-Miss)...

Who he had ridden like a wet whore throughout their entire professional relationsip...

• His implicit criticism of Gore’s personality: “Al Gore’s breadth and depth of knowledge, his experience, his grasp of the issue were clearly superior [to Bush]. But people liked Bush.” However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.

Brief pause for projectile vomiting...

• His disdain for former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) who he said was bent on “demonizing” Democrats and portraying them as not only wrong or misguided but “evil,” and his scathing criticism of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), whom he accused of ruling “by fear, by discouraging any form of dissent among his membership, and by punishing those who dare to disagree.”

Both far, far better men than this duplicitous dissembler could ever hope to be in his wildest ambitions.

• His revelation that he intended to run for president himself in 2004 until he decided, after enduring “excruciating” inner turmoil, that he did not want to risk giving up his Senate seat and could not run for president and lead his caucus “in a new Senate that had an aggressive and extremely empowered Republican majority.”

Translation: He polled in the lower fifth percentile and nobody gave the worthless scum any cash.

58 posted on 10/14/2003 7:58:37 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.

What alternate reality is this?

59 posted on 10/14/2003 8:05:07 PM PDT by GeronL (Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl and http://freestateparty.50megs.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
It wasn't a lust for power; simply an effort by a failed candidate to won an election by deflect attention from his poor campaign, nowhere better demonstrated by his inability to win his own state.
60 posted on 10/14/2003 8:14:18 PM PDT by RobbyS (CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson