Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?
Yahoo! News ^ | May 17, 2019 | Andrew Romano

Posted on 05/17/2019 10:08:03 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Not so ‘woke’

And then there were 14.

The ranks of white, male Democrats who seem to have surveyed the party’s sprawling primary field and concluded that America clearly needs another president who looks like them continued to expand this week. Montana Gov. Steve Bullock and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio followed in the footsteps of other little-known white dudes such as Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, California Rep. Eric Swalwell, Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton and Colorado Sen. Michael Bennett, launching their own late-breaking presidential bids.

Bullock and de Blasio’s back-to-back announcements mean that a full 61 percent of the comically vast 23-person Democratic lineup is now made up of white men after the groundbreaking early weeks of the contest, when most of the candidates were women and/or people of color.

Some Democrats were not rejoicing at the news of de Balsio’s candidacy, in particular. “I have no idea what the mayor is doing,” one operative told Yahoo News. “Delusional,” said another.

Yet as skeptical as Dems may be, few have suggested that the latest white guys to declare would be better suited to serve as vice president than as commander in chief.

That dubious honor, it seems, has so far been reserved for candidates of color — black women in particular.

After 2018 Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams was floated by associates of former Vice President Joe Biden as a possible out-of-the-gate ticketmate — a proposition that Abrams swatted aside, saying, “You don’t run for second place” — the VP speculation has intensified around the only black woman already running for president: California Sen. Kamala Harris.

(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: California; Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: andrewromano; california; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; heelsupharris; kamalaharris; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2019 10:08:03 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

maybe because she doesn’t stand a chance in Hell of winning the top slot nomination


2 posted on 05/17/2019 10:09:56 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Kamaltoe has a problem … there’s nobody she can “sleep with” to be given the presidency.


3 posted on 05/17/2019 10:11:21 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is the point where they figure out that every Democrat candidate being also considered as VP is, if picked, an assassination threat to any other Democrat candidate.

None of them can trust each other any more than we trust them, and none can turn his back on the next.


4 posted on 05/17/2019 10:12:20 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She’s not eligible for either.


5 posted on 05/17/2019 10:13:13 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?

Because if she has any political smarts she knows no one has a snowball's chance in New Orleans to beat Trump in 2020, but looking good enough as a VP candidate would make her the automatic front runner for 2024. (And unlike with Sarah Palin, the media would support her in this.)

6 posted on 05/17/2019 10:13:57 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?

She'll fit under the Resolute Desk easier during those National Security meetings.

7 posted on 05/17/2019 10:16:16 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Ms. Harris has a LOT of competition for the “last cookie on the plate”, as I have seen the vying for vice president so succinctly described. Stacey Abrams, for one, and Pete Buttigieg, for another, seem to be the leading favorites for the slot.

What would Ms. Harris bring to the table? Certainly not a sweet disposition.


8 posted on 05/17/2019 10:18:36 AM PDT by alloysteel (The difference between real life and fiction? Fiction has to make sense and follow some logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?”

Is it just me or is that a total non sequitur?


9 posted on 05/17/2019 10:19:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why do I always have to think of everything?

There is a very simple solution to this mess. The Democratic National Committee should just change its rules to make white men ineligible for nomination.

Of course, there will be the problem of white men self-identifying as a black lesbians, or whatever. I’ll leave it to the DNC to work out those details.


10 posted on 05/17/2019 10:19:11 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Maybe because she’s an idiot who is totally unqualified. Yeah, I know, that didn’t stop ObaMao. But the novelty of first black president (even if he was, at most, 3/8th black) has long since worn off.


11 posted on 05/17/2019 10:20:07 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Kamala is an anchor baby.


12 posted on 05/17/2019 10:22:36 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
How would any of the potential 2020 Democrat VPs be more qualified by 2024? They ALL lack gravitas. How can any of them obtain gravitas by 2024?
13 posted on 05/17/2019 10:24:51 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe because she is INELLIGIBLE for either office


14 posted on 05/17/2019 10:28:11 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The “heels-up, knees-wide” KamalToe isn’t even eligible for POTUS or VP. As stated above, she’s an anchor baby. She’s also unqualified and barely made it as “Willie’s Mattress”


15 posted on 05/17/2019 10:31:20 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What’s the “settle” about?
She has a race “qualification” which is the ONLY thing she has. If she had a discernible IQ (goes for ALL the Dimbulbcrat candidates), she’d have a beef.

But she doesn’t so she doesn’t.

Lady, politics is the only place for idiots - oops, make that politics and journalism.

Get a real life, learn a useful trade, and if you fail, seriously consider seppuku. There are plenty of women out there much more capable than you. And they just happen to be conservative.


16 posted on 05/17/2019 10:42:29 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Partisan Media Shills update.


17 posted on 05/17/2019 10:43:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Stacey Abrams, for one, and Pete Buttigieg, for another, seem to be the leading favorites for the slot.

Throw in O'Rourke and you have three Dems with a lot of buzz who all lost statewide races, and thought that qualified them for a promotion.
18 posted on 05/17/2019 10:59:41 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wonder if they ever get tired of writing the same old tripe.


19 posted on 05/17/2019 11:06:02 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

My rule of thumb on presidential election viability

- “Can you win a state wide race?”

No !

So stop wasting people time!


20 posted on 05/17/2019 11:09:06 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson