Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
maybe because she doesn’t stand a chance in Hell of winning the top slot nomination
2 posted on
05/17/2019 10:09:56 AM PDT by
digger48
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Kamaltoe has a problem … there’s nobody she can “sleep with” to be given the presidency.
3 posted on
05/17/2019 10:11:21 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is the point where they figure out that every Democrat candidate being also considered as VP is, if picked, an assassination threat to any other Democrat candidate.
None of them can trust each other any more than we trust them, and none can turn his back on the next.
4 posted on
05/17/2019 10:12:20 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She’s not eligible for either.
5 posted on
05/17/2019 10:13:13 AM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?Because if she has any political smarts she knows no one has a snowball's chance in New Orleans to beat Trump in 2020, but looking good enough as a VP candidate would make her the automatic front runner for 2024. (And unlike with Sarah Palin, the media would support her in this.)
6 posted on
05/17/2019 10:13:57 AM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?She'll fit under the Resolute Desk easier during those National Security meetings.
7 posted on
05/17/2019 10:16:16 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?”
Is it just me or is that a total non sequitur?
9 posted on
05/17/2019 10:19:00 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why do I always have to think of everything?
There is a very simple solution to this mess. The Democratic National Committee should just change its rules to make white men ineligible for nomination.
Of course, there will be the problem of white men self-identifying as a black lesbians, or whatever. I’ll leave it to the DNC to work out those details.
10 posted on
05/17/2019 10:19:11 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Kamala is an anchor baby.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How would any of the potential 2020 Democrat VPs be more qualified by 2024? They ALL lack gravitas. How can any of them obtain gravitas by 2024?
13 posted on
05/17/2019 10:24:51 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Maybe because she is INELLIGIBLE for either office
14 posted on
05/17/2019 10:28:11 AM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The “heels-up, knees-wide” KamalToe isn’t even eligible for POTUS or VP. As stated above, she’s an anchor baby. She’s also unqualified and barely made it as “Willie’s Mattress”
15 posted on
05/17/2019 10:31:20 AM PDT by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What’s the “settle” about?
She has a race “qualification” which is the ONLY thing she has. If she had a discernible IQ (goes for ALL the Dimbulbcrat candidates), she’d have a beef.
But she doesn’t so she doesn’t.
Lady, politics is the only place for idiots - oops, make that politics and journalism.
Get a real life, learn a useful trade, and if you fail, seriously consider seppuku. There are plenty of women out there much more capable than you. And they just happen to be conservative.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder if they ever get tired of writing the same old tripe.
19 posted on
05/17/2019 11:06:02 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She’s just as ineligible for Veep as she is for the presidency. And she knows it - she’s carefully edited her website to avoid giving the facts of her ineligibility.
21 posted on
05/17/2019 11:16:31 AM PDT by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
22 posted on
05/17/2019 11:32:34 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: 2ndDivisionVet
She can strike a blow for feminism! Except she already did with Willie Brown.
23 posted on
05/17/2019 1:01:09 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(Build the wall, deport them all.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
There are 14 white male Dems running for president. So why should Kamala Harris settle for veep?
Yahoo is now commie media. Becuase we're a free society and the best person wins?
25 posted on
05/17/2019 3:44:43 PM PDT by
Vision
(Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
27 posted on
05/17/2019 4:31:31 PM PDT by
dead
(Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Harris isn’t remotely qualified for her current job.
30 posted on
05/17/2019 7:57:02 PM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
