Posted on 01/22/2019 6:54:05 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
(snip)
Look only at her two years in the Senate and two relevant data points pop up. First, theres her recent attempt, along with Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, to apply an anti-Catholic religious test to a judicial nominee because he belonged to the Knights of Columbus. This was too much even for her fellow Democrats to bear not a single one objected to a resolution that implicitly rebuked Harris and Hirono for their behavior.
The second relevant point is Harris conduct during the Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearings. No, not the contentious second round of Kavanaugh hearings involving sexual misconduct allegations, but the relatively placid first round in early September. During that process, Harris insinuated, through a line of questioning, that Kavanaugh had held a highly improper conversation about the Russia investigation with someone at the law firm President Trump had hired. After casting this slanderous aspersion, Harris then knowingly lied to journalists in order to prejudice public opinion against Kavanaugh's nomination. She falsely assured reporters that she had "good reason" and "reliable" evidence that Kavanaugh had indeed discussed the Russia investigation with lawyers at Trump's firm.
Then, as it turned out, she didn't have any evidence at all. She had been bluffing, the way unethical prosecutors do when trying to get people to plead guilty to offenses they didn't commit. But this wasnt some police interrogation room it was a Senate committee hearing. Harris was thus exposed as a liar the moment her bluff was called. But it illustrates how accustomed she already was to using prosecutorial power and access to the media to smear and bully the innocent and guilty alike.
These two incidents clearly indicate the kind of progressivism that Harris espouses. It is the same intolerant, authoritarian, by-any-means ideology ...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Yeah, thats the big wildcard for next year, and everyone knows they will cheat big time!
SmugSmirk.One word.
Kamala Harris = Obama with tits
All the qualities which make her unappealing to us will work to her advantage in the Democrat primaries, so she has a shot at winning the nomination, unless she flames out in the primaries or the DNC picks another candidate as the one they want.
Female version of Obama.
She is not eligible to be POTUS.
U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is NOT a natural born Citizen of USA NOT Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief of Our Military per U.S. Constitution
Both of Senator Kamala Harriss parents were not U.S. Citizens when Kamala was born. Kamala Harris was born to a Jamaican Citizen father (minus one stool leg) and to a Citizen of India mother (minus the 2nd stool leg).
Please link below for more info and share it with the world.
You should also tweet the fact that
Castro is also ineligible, as his
mother is the daughter of an illegal
immigrant, and his parents never
married.
Well, to Dems and lots of people on the right,
She’s been born in Oakland, CA. Which we assume it could be proven easily.
That’s enough for them.
Any other objection to her legitimacy according to the wording of the Constitution is lumped as Birthers.
The fight has been raging on elsewhere already.
Exactly. I didn’t catch anything in the first round of Kavanaugh questioning. I did see the final interrogation where his virginity was discussed, ect, and Harris’ was in a sense the worst of them all.
Harris is a horrible person.
JoMa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.