Posted on 07/29/2017 6:54:39 AM PDT by DWW1990
Donald Trump has finally returned the U.S. military to sound service policy when it comes to the gender-confused. For nearly the whole history of the U.S. military, and for almost as long as the idea of a “transgendered” person has existed, and for reasons that sounded-minded people have long understood and accepted, individuals who imagined themselves “trapped in the wrong body” (or some version of such perversion) have been barred from serving in any branch of the U.S. armed forces.
The only thing that should be up for debate here is why this took so long. Perhaps it was just some measure of politics, but this decision should have been easy and quick. In other words, the decision whether to ban the mentally ill (I prefer morally ill) from serving in the U.S. military should have happened within the first couple of weeks of the Trump administration.
...It is of course absurd that we continue to have to debate the clear, undeniable science and morality of life in the womb, the unmistakable truth of what is marriage, and the like, but to have to debate seriously with large segments of our culture—including high-ranking officials in the worlds of science and politics—what is a man and what is a woman is perhaps the highest level of absurdity any human being in America with two brain cells to rub together has had to endure. Again, we see, liberalism corrupts.
(Excerpt) Read more at trevorgrantthomas.com ...
This is very true. This LGBT pc crap and their open borders policies are an attempt to disenfranchise morally based, free thinkers like us conservatives. Sadly, countries like Britain are already too far gone, having been caught off guard by the leftist elitist attack. Now it’s too late for them. Here is an article from a few years back where many of the WW2 veterans basically said that their sacrifice wasn’t worth it in light of the “new Britannia - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
We owe it to our kids and grandkids to never let the progressives take their victory here. Close the borders, fight the pc LGBT indoctrination and retake our Country.
Has the policy actually been changed? So far it seems to be just a tweet. The actual legal directive should have sent simultaneously to the tweet.
There is no such thing as transgendering. The are forcing us to use the vocabulary of transgenderism. The next generation will accept it as fact.
yes, that’s true, the next generation will accept it as a fact; as a “given” of life.
Just as they have changed the definition of the word “gay”, to mean homosexual and only homosexual, not its dictionary definition, just as they have changed the definition of the word “marriage”, which now has to include same-sex couples, this transsexual business, will be taken as a given, just part of everyday life.
Geez, to listen to some of these people, you would swear that your life isn’t complete until you have had your sex change operation..........
Just an insane decision by the president after the NFL drafted a couple dozen women a few months ago. /sarc
Clearly, the NFL is a major discriminator against BOTH females and females who think they are males.
They also discriminate against wolves who think they are panthers.
Well said!
Like the author, I prefer “gender confused.”
Why is it always males playing on female teams and not females playing on male teams?
Why is every “man has baby” always a female?
Why is every “woman fathers baby” always a male?
Why is every “politician turns honest” always fantasy/sci fi?
:>)
The fact that he calls it “gender” and not “sex” proves that the author does not understand the nature of the conflict. If you control the language framing the debate, then you also control its outcome. Words like “homosexual” and “cross-dresser” came into use because they are literal and accurate depictions of what makes that an individual a member of that group. Referring to them instead with words like “inter-gender” and “gay” separates the idea of those individuals from the acts they engaged in that made them part of that group in the first place.
It’s even more deliberately deceptive than trying to frame the debate about “illegal aliens” by calling them “undocumented immigrants.” The opposing sides aren’t even talking about the same thing.
If you accept the progressivists’ premise, you at the very least begin the debate on the back foot because the language of the debate tips the playing field in their favor. And at worst, you already have lost the debate because you entered it accepting a disadvantage you cannot overcome.
Well said.
Exactly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.