This is very true. This LGBT pc crap and their open borders policies are an attempt to disenfranchise morally based, free thinkers like us conservatives. Sadly, countries like Britain are already too far gone, having been caught off guard by the leftist elitist attack. Now it’s too late for them. Here is an article from a few years back where many of the WW2 veterans basically said that their sacrifice wasn’t worth it in light of the “new Britannia - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
We owe it to our kids and grandkids to never let the progressives take their victory here. Close the borders, fight the pc LGBT indoctrination and retake our Country.
Has the policy actually been changed? So far it seems to be just a tweet. The actual legal directive should have sent simultaneously to the tweet.
There is no such thing as transgendering. The are forcing us to use the vocabulary of transgenderism. The next generation will accept it as fact.
Just an insane decision by the president after the NFL drafted a couple dozen women a few months ago. /sarc
Clearly, the NFL is a major discriminator against BOTH females and females who think they are males.
They also discriminate against wolves who think they are panthers.
The fact that he calls it “gender” and not “sex” proves that the author does not understand the nature of the conflict. If you control the language framing the debate, then you also control its outcome. Words like “homosexual” and “cross-dresser” came into use because they are literal and accurate depictions of what makes that an individual a member of that group. Referring to them instead with words like “inter-gender” and “gay” separates the idea of those individuals from the acts they engaged in that made them part of that group in the first place.
It’s even more deliberately deceptive than trying to frame the debate about “illegal aliens” by calling them “undocumented immigrants.” The opposing sides aren’t even talking about the same thing.
If you accept the progressivists’ premise, you at the very least begin the debate on the back foot because the language of the debate tips the playing field in their favor. And at worst, you already have lost the debate because you entered it accepting a disadvantage you cannot overcome.