Posted on 04/22/2016 12:18:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Have we not all learned that this is a terrible year for broad pronouncements? The past months are littered with the failed assertions of oh-so-smart people who just knew they had everything figured out.
Trump is a joke. No, wait, he’s inevitable. He’s out of control. No, now he’s more disciplined, He’s got this. No, he’s a loose cannon.
Cruz has no chance to be the nominee. No, wait, now he has the inside track. His campaign operation has too many flaws. No, now they are the smart ones with the best delegate roundup skills.
It’s the Year of the Governor. Nope, all the Governors are gone. Wait, there’s one. It’s John Kasich. He’s a terrible choice. No, wait, he’s great because he matches up well against Hillary. But he can’t win anything outside his own state and Manhattan.
Stop. Everybody just stop.
It’s hard, especially for people in the analysis business. We are supposed to be able to read tea leaves and tell the world what to expect miles down the road. Now it’s a minefield just trying to suggest what might happen in the next few weeks. For the first time in the memories of most people, we have an election year with races not yet settled in the springtime. The usual drill is Iowa, New Hampshire, maybe another state or two, then the concrete sets and we wait six months for the predictable infomercials of the conventions.
You could say this year has been wildly different.
And yet, all through the shows I host and the others I listen to, and across the television landscape, the habit persists: people shooting off at the mouth as if they know what will happen in November.
Since there are many possibilities, any one of a number of these smarty-pants folks may wind up right. But that doesn’t mean there is cause for certainty right now.
The foremost cases in point: “Trump can’t win” and “Cruz can’t win.” These sad-sack defeatist themes are everywhere, and every Republican should know they are highly flawed.
Let’s first dismiss their use by the two campaigns in question. Donald Trump and Ted Cruz will obviously cast doubts on each other’s electability. That’s campaign piffle.
The truth of the matter is that there is a plausible path forward for either man to be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. It is important to solidify this argument now because there will be mischief afoot this summer in the form of urgent calls for some third way, some brave knight to ride in to save us from the certain failure of our actual frontrunners against Hillary Clinton. John Kasich wants to be fill that role. Paul Ryan says he does not, but I’ll believe it when I don’t see it. There are even some noble and palatable names who did offer themselves up this year who might deserve a rethink. Okay, there’s one: Scott Walker.
But none of this is necessary. Trump can win. Cruz can win. Here’s how:
We begin with Trump because, well, everything begins with Trump. Are his negatives high? Sure they are, and there is nothing he can do about some of that. Some people just hate his guts, and the loudest of those seem to be Republicans terrified of having their comfort zones redrawn by a very different kind of nominee.
Most “Never Trump” tantrums will subside if he is the standard bearer. Maybe not among elites and pundits who may not recover from the vapors, but real voters will stare down the barrel of a Hillary presidency come October and get clarity in a hurry. The wild over criticism of him will subside, as will obsessions over some criticisms that may indeed hold water. The realization will dawn that even the brash, inconsistently conservative Trump presidency is infinitely preferable to the certain disaster that would accompany the election of Hillary Clinton.
Once his own party wises up and realizes this, his negatives will drop. They will drop further when they see him do something a Republican nominee has not done in a long while— go after a Democrat opponent with some energy and spine.
After watching John McCain and Mitt Romney’s soft touch against Barack Obama candidacies that swelled into the most harmful presidency in our history, this is the year for the GOP nominee to boldly identify the consequences of bringing about Obama’s third term. Does anyone doubt that Trump will do this?
Ted Cruz would as well, which is a good place to start the case for his electability. Hillary Clinton will dread debate nights with either man. My bet is she will agree to precisely one debate up against the hammer of Trump or the scalpel of Cruz.
Cruz is the embodiment of everything Republicans have sought since Reagan. His consistent conservatism has earned him scorn from Democrats, who know he is a genuine fighter, and from meek Republicans whose inadequacies are unveiled by his steadfastness.
His negatives are high as well. But it’s April. Can we remember that this is the rough and tumble primary season where Republicans in particular relish the circular firing squad? If Cruz carries the nomination out of Cleveland in July, the party will have finally offered up a candidate whom the faithful can vote for with no need to hold noses or make excuses.
The only serious Cruz concerns seem to involve those hard-to-define properties of likability, relatability and personal charm, found in abundance in candidates like Marco Rubio and Chris Christie (and Presidents like Reagan and Bill Clinton).
These are not irrelevant matters, but there is good news on that front. As someone who has known Cruz since his Texas Solicitor General Days, I can tell you he is an affable and good-humored man with connective qualities that will become more apparent when the post-convention smoke clears.
Most Americans have consumed Cruz in sharp doses— a sound bite of a contentious Senate speech, a brief segment on a cable channel— likely on the occasion of a lonely struggle against the Obama administration or a Republican party unwilling to thwart it. Given the time to offer up a positive vision for post-Obama America, Cruz will reveal the talents I have seen him deploy on numerous occasions— the gift of an inspiring and uplifting message that will explain better than most rivals why conservatism is good for rich and poor, young and old, men and women, Americans of all races. He will speak of opportunity and jobs and the rule of law and getting control of insane Washington spending.
And millions will eat it up.
How many millions? I wish I knew. I can’t guarantee a Cruz win any more than I can guarantee a Trump win. But the Cruz campaign will be so energizing to long-starved conservatives that many would crawl on shards of glass to make him President.
So enough laments that Cruz or Trump cannot win. When you hear them, know that it is not likely a heartfelt judgment, but a bat swung from an opposing camp. The Trump people want to win his way, the Cruz people want to win his way. It gives an extra zing to say your guy is the only path to victory, but don’t believe it.
Hillary might beat either man. But either man might beat her. Yes, she will have that infernal let’s-make-history fuel in her tank. But the first woman president thing may lose some appeal after a few months of ads reminding America of her mountain of scandal and proven mishandling of national security matters. Add her complete lack of campaign skills and her inability to count on the raw enthusiasm that propelled Obama, and maybe the prospects look a little brighter. And amid all the wailing over whether Republicans will coalesce, it may be the Democrats who face the harder problem, with millions of Bernie Sanders voters who don’t give a flip about her.
And on that electoral college map that everyone says is so hostile to any Republican, remember that Mitt Romney lost vital Ohio by less than three points and vital Florida by less than one.
This November, either Trump or Cruz will be better than Romney, and Clinton will be weaker than Obama.
So everybody buck up. Enough Republicans bellyaching about how Trump or Cruz cannot win. We’re all caught up in the dramas of today, and more are on the horizon. But the time will come when all of the preliminaries are over and the battle for our nation’s future will be at hand, from the end of July to November 8. In the hands of Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, we will mount that battle with genuinely heavy artillery.
I do city and state contracts mostly, but some Alderman over the years I’ve had to grease up. They really can’t hassle me too much, but it’s always good to know the right ones.
Ed Burke, Rostenkowski and Vrdolyak were notorious for having you ticketed while you were doing work. The newer alderman don’t have that much pull with the police. Not like they used to.
Daley Jr. also took a lot of control from the wards when it comes to building inspectors and the like, the alderman really lost a lot of the power they once had to shake a contractor like me down.
But, I’m not a developer, but I know there is plenty of greasing that needs to go on the get zoning permits the developers want, or to get them to sign off on achetectual improvements, etc, I am not involved in any of that, but it’s where a lot of donations go.
You don’t actually pay off alderman anymore (you donate your 2,500 but), you give to their churches, or their “special causes”. United Way is a big filter of that sort of stuff, and in Chicago, churches. Ever wonder why there is a storefront church in black precincts every block? They all have to be greased if you are a developer.
In the suburbs here, it’s Mega Churches (and again United Way). You can give unlimited to Mega Churches, and the politician can then get recognition from the church and basically and endorsement from the mega-church. Not outright an endorsement, but he’ll be brought in to speak to the congregation a lot, he has a captive audience, where his opponent won’t. Once he get friendly with the church (Duckworth and Kirk are great at this), they have that whole vote locked up hard. Remember, all a politician does with his money is buy votes, so if he can get around disclosing his finances, and you give to the church or charity, you just cut him out of the paper trail, and he gets the same result.
The other big kicker is United Way. You give to them, they know who your giving to on whose behalf etc, and the politicians wives and kids get great jobs there. Do nothing jobs that pay an easy 6 figures. Plenty of other “charities” as well. That’s just the most common we have to deal with.
I also have to be a member of the Elks, Moose, Optimists, about 4 Chambers of Commerce we give to, the list is never ending and it grows every year. Those guys don’t shake you down, but it’s still important to be a donor to them.
Cruz disenfranchising voters with backroom shenanigans isn’t a winning strategy in 2016 or 2020. He is killing his career.
Like you, I know all about this ( heck, almost EVERYONE over the age of 15 does, in Chicago )and NOTHING ever changes, except I'm surprised re the Aldermen. I hadn't realized that little Richie had put a boot down on that one. LOL
This kind of stuff isn't isolated to Chicago nor the state of Ill.! It isn't even an American specific thing, but an "old world concept...as in "BAKSHEESH" which is probably as old as humankind.
He doesn’t want to date his daughter...THAT is creepy.
Both Trump and Cruz have roses _and_ thorns. Both could get the nomination. Only Trump has a chance to win on the first ballot but on subsequent ballots other could.
When I saw the title of this article, I thought it could be about running Trump/Cruz. I was really interested in that bc I think that’s a winner. Everything Trump said about Cruz will be excused with “that’s just primary talk, Ted is smart and played the rules” etc.
It could unite us.
Flame away.
Hillary won over a million votes in NY. Trump won 524,000.
Also, the time to change one's party registration was at the start of LAST OCTOBER and did NOT get much publicity.
And making Hillary SPEND MONEY IN A "EASY" BLUE STATE" is not only as rare as hens' teeth, but amazing!
LOL....and YOU imagine that you know and understand politics?
Besides Cruz being a liar, a cheat, untrustworthy and a WEIRDO. In ways we don't even know about yet. But we do know all that cultish "Raising of the Saints" and "Anointed One" crap and his alignment with Dominionism and Latter Day Saints and other cults disguised as religions.
Cruz is a gigantic risk, at the very least. He needs to be NOWHERE NEAR the presidency. He's a loose cannon, and at the very least a Manchurian Candidate, a foreigner candidate put forth by the Globalist/New World Order to continue their ending of the sovereignty of the USA, first replacing it with a North American Union. He supports the WTO, TPA, TPP, millions of new immigrant workers, open border, settlement of muslims here in unlimited numbers (see the Ryan/Cruz Omnibus spending bill)...is that enough just by itself?
PS Mark Davis is a poser idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.