Posted on 03/29/2016 2:21:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Plenty of buzz about this last night, especially among anti-Trumpers struck by the coincidence of Trump superfan Newt criticizing him publicly on the same day that an even bigger superfan, Ann Coulter, called Trump “mental” in an interview. (Matt Drudge, yet another superfan, is leading as I write this with the news of Trump’s campaign manager being arrested for battery.) Are Trump’s cheerleaders heading for the lifeboats because they know something we don’t?
Nah. They’re still onboard, they’re just alarmed that the captain won’t steer away from that iceberg that keeps getting closer. Trump’s fans within the commentariat have, I think, convinced themselves that his boorishness is strategic, something he can turn on and off at will to command the media. It’s served him well but now, facing a de facto head to head race with Cruz, he should be sealing the deal by shifting to a more low-key “presidential” approach. Reassure Republican undecideds in the remaining primaries that you’re up to the job. Impress delegates at the convention that you won’t be a loose cannon as nominee. Attract swing voters in the general election by demonstrating that the vulgar, street-fighting Trump of the primaries was a persona adopted for electoral advantage, one that will be discarded to defeat a new opponent in Hillary Clinton. I think it’s dawning on Newt (and Coulter in the other clip) that maybe the boorishness isn’t strategic. Maybe it’s who Trump is. Maybe he can’t resist attacking Heidi Cruz, no matter how obviously stupid that is, because he’s spent his life being rewarded for boorish aggressiveness that supposedly proves his alpha-male dominance. What you’re seeing, in other words, is Gingrich contemplating possibly for the first time that Trump’s campaign really might turn into a dumpster fire in November because he’s too indisciplined and too much of an egomaniac to fiddle with a dangerous approach that’s worked for him in other contexts. Ben Domenech’s got it right:
At exactly the moment Trump ought to be transforming himself into a unifying figure, he is ensuring that is all the more difficult by stooping to baseless personal attacks and driving down his numbers among Republican women and social conservatives. In failing to recognize the importance of delegates and in engaging in these unnecessary personal attacks, Trump decreases his potential to win the nomination on the first ballot. If Trump is actually beaten because of these decisions it shows he’s not ready to lead a party anyway…
Coulter is a lot of things, but she’s no dummy. She understands that by politicizing Heidi Cruz’s depression and her appearance, Trump is hurting his ability to ever receive the support of a growing portion of Republican women, particularly social conservatives and evangelicals.
Until very recently, Cruz said repeatedly that he’d honor his pledge this fall to support the GOP nominee. Lately he’s stopped because, uh, how could he not when Trump’s taking shots at his wife? That’s a microcosm of how a presumptive nominee is throwing away support he desperately needs to win in November. Why can’t Trump lay off when even his own fans are telling him he’s making a mistake? David Brooks has a theory:
Trump’s misogyny, on the other hand, has a commercial flavor. The central arena of life is male competition. Women are objects men use to win points in that competition. The purpose of a woman’s body is to reflect status on a man. One way to emasculate a rival man is to insult or conquer his woman…
It’s not quite right to say that Trump is a throwback to midcentury sexism. At least in those days negative behavior toward women and family members was restrained by the chivalry code. Political candidates didn’t go attacking their rivals’ wives based on their looks. Trump’s objectification is uncontrolled. It’s pure ego competition with a pornogrified flavor.
In this way, Trump represents the spread of something brutal. He takes economic anxiety and turns it into sexual hostility. He effectively tells men: You may be struggling, but at least you’re better than women, Mexicans and Muslims.
And he’ll take that credo into battle against the would-be first woman president. The question unasked of Newt and Coulter is why they didn’t expect Trump to eventually take a cheap shot at Cruz’s wife given the sort of attitude Brooks describes, which Trump has harbored for decades. Why is there a note of frustration in backing (or all but backing, in Newt’s case) a guy who’s had this priced into his stock all along? It’s like watching a Cruz fan get exasperated that he keeps talking about faith and religious liberty. That’s who he is; if you don’t like it, you’re backing the wrong candidate. And it’s a lead-pipe cinch that this is who Trump will continue to be: If he’s the nominee, the odds that he won’t eventually attack Hillary Clinton in some sexist manner during the general election campaign are basically zero. Obama famously said in one of his books that the Hopenchange phenomenon was due in part to his fans projecting their own personal ideals onto him, as a blank slate. But there’s a weird, surprising element of that too with Trump, who should be the opposite of a blank slate after 40 years in the public eye. He is who he is, which is who he’s always been, yet here are Newt and Ann discovering nine months into his campaign that the nasty attacks on Twitter aren’t just some media kabuki he’s performing to dominate the morning chat shows and impress his savvier acolytes within the political class. It just may be that he really is temperamentally unfit for office.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Blah, blah, blah...
As Gingrich said, he could have responded, and should have, but his response was silly, and even sillier was the later tweet with side by side pictures.
I agree with what Gingrich said Trump should have responded with, that would have ended it and made Cruz look the fool... Trump didn’t help himself with how he handled it.
Good grief, you have turned into a bitter old goat.
Newt was a change agent in 1994 and it was all down hill after that.
A punch point of his decline was sitting with Pelosi supporting the scam known as ‘Global Warming’.
er, I was referring to Trump.
ted aint from Brooklyn.
But I just looked. Neither is Trump. A little further up in Queens is where he grew up.
Nope, just tired of being accused of supporting Hillary Clinton because I haven’t joined the cult.
they’re nuts. We moved to Staten Island from Brooklyn when I was seven and I had to take up boxing in my teens because you’d get into a fight whether you wanted to or not at the dance clubs here and in Brooklyn.
my cousin Joseph used to parallel park by ramming the car behind and ahead of him.
I had a friend who for laughs would drive to the projects and tap black guys with his car at red lights. then he’d burst out laughing.
screws loose
Funny you should say this because Trump gave money to Hillary and lots of other Dems...Trump is a militant RINO, why are you trashing the only conservative left in the race Jo6chip?
Not trying to stir you up, I really am interested in why so many Freepers are so adamant about Trump when I think he will cut a deal with Reid and Pelosi if he is elected...
Newt talks about sending colonies to Mars and he calls Trumps comments stupid?
I am as everyone knows a total Trumpet. But I thought it was just stupid of Trump to post that re-tweet.
Now that being said I also think Donald Trump was furious that Ted Cruz in cahoots with his super PAC put up a really tasteless vicious ad using Melania’s photo. Melania Trump has not been active in Trump’s campaign at all.
Newt’s advice to Donald to get back on message is the same as my advice. Destiny will take care of Ted Cruz.
[Are Trump’s cheerleaders heading for the lifeboats because they know something we don’t?]
I think it may be the fact Trump seem to be on a mission to alienate as many potential voters as possible now that he thinks he has the nomination in the bag (and is positioned to blow up the party if someone else gets majority delegates at the convention).
And a Veep spot too.
LOL. Yeah your stories are what I have heard is the norm there. Thank goodness I didn’t park behind Joseph on either of my ventures to NYC.
Newt’s been very pro-Trump. Like a number of people, he is getting uncomfortable that this is going to spin wildly out of control.
I agree with you. Rather than hurling expletives and name calling at Newt, he is offering legitimate feedback about getting the campaign in the right direction. Let’s realize that Trump needs to at some point go into full presidential mode and not have tantrums when something unfavorable is said. He has no chance in November in his current approach.
If you have proof that Cruz coordinated with a PAC, you should contact the Federal Election Commission.
Telephone Numbers:
Toll-free: 800-424-9530
Local: 202-694-1000
TTY for the hearing impaired: 202-219-3336
because he’s too arrogant and too much of a fighter to leave office with a deficit or a weak military.
that’s good enough for me.
ted’s taking “act of loves’” endorsement didn’t help.
You cannot argue against the fact that Trump is a militant RINO and you really are just like Donnie, nasty little comments to those that disagree with you...
Why Trump is a RINO:
Conservatives never give money to Reverend "I wanna start a riot" Sharpton
Conservatives never give money to the Clinton Foundation.
Conservatives never give money to Harry Reid.
Conservatives don't praise baby butchers AKA Planned Parenthood.
Conservatives should not have supported TARP or any other bailout.
Conservatives do not praise socialistic medicine in Scotland or Canada.
Conservatives should be completely against illegal immigration and amnesty of any kind.
Conservatives can disagree with military policy / foreign policy, but once they commit one way, if they change their minds, they should be honest about it and not pretend their position has not changed.
Conservatives should not trash other conservatives no matter what, you can disagree but never trash.
Try to respond Joey by respecting your opponent, I know its hard, but try...
I think the comments of Ann and Newt were more warnings, their honest sentiments, advice if you will, to the guy they support. Headline writers have twisted their sentiments to ‘turning on Trump’ when that’s not the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.