Posted on 08/11/2012 2:48:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Liberal pundits are already fanning out in force to attack and discredit Paul Ryan. Michael Tomasky, who recently wrote a Newsweek cover story calling Mitt Romney a wimp, has now decided that Romneys bold move is a terrible choice because Ryan has proven himself to be an extremist on budget issues.
No doubt there are many Democrats rubbing their hands in glee in contemplation of reviving some version of the ad that featured an actor playing Paul Ryan pushing a grandmother in a wheelchair off a cliff. But the smarter ones are worried.
First, if Ryan is an extremist and his proposals are so unpopular, how has he won election seven times in a Democratic district? His lowest share of the vote was 57 percent in his first race. He routinely wins over two-thirds of the vote. When Obama swept the nation in 2008, he carried Ryans district by four points. But at the same time, Ryan won reelection with 65 percent of the vote, meaning that a fifth of Obama voters also voted for him.
Ryan has pointed out to me that no Republican has carried his district for president since Ronald Reagan in 1984. I have held hundreds of town-hall meetings in my district explaining why we have to take bold reform steps, and Ive found treating people like adults works, he told me. All those ads pushing elderly woman off the cliffs dont work anymore if you lay out the problem.
Second, Democrats know that Ryan has Reaganesque qualities that make him appealing to independent, middle-class voters. Take the cover story on Ryan that the Isthmus, a radically left-wing Madison, Wis. newspaper, ran on him in 2009. Ryan, with his sunny disposition and choirboy looks, projects compassion and forcefully proclaims dedication to his district, the story reported. And hes proved he is not unyieldingly pro-corporate, as when he recently joined in condemnation of AIG retention bonuses.
Third, Ryans ideas arent that novel or scary. The idea of premium support for Medicare, which would change the programs one-size-fits-all policy to a private-insurance model with public options, was endorsed by a bipartisan commission appointed by Bill Clinton back in the 1990s. Late last year, Ryan announced a new version of his proposal with a new partner signing on: Democratic senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, who first achieved political prominence as an advocate for seniors.
Four, Ryan puts Wisconsin and its ten electoral votes in play. Polls have shown that President Obama holds a five to seven point lead in Wisconsin significant, but much less than Obamas 14-point margin in 2008. With Ryan on the ticket, polls show the race is dead even.
Five, if Republicans were looking for a superior candidate, theyve found it in Ryan. His maiden speech as the GOP vice-presidential candidate was perfectly pitched:
We wont duck the tough issues . . . we will lead!
We wont blame others we will take responsibility!
We wont replace our founding principles . . . we will reapply them!
Echoes of Ronald Reagan at his best.
Ryan was judged to have already had the better of President Obama in televised exchanges on Obamacare. His debate with Joe Biden this October might well be remembered as cruel and unusual punishment for dim vice presidents. Recall that Sarah Palin fought a much more engaged Joe Biden to a draw in their 2008 vice-presidential debate.
Six, as Democratic consultant Joe Trippi acknowledged today on Fox News, Ryan will bring in a flood of donations from overjoyed conservatives and tea-party members. Romney had a problem with energizing the GOP base. That problem is now solved, and that will make it easier to pump up conservative turnout.
Democrats will no doubt try to make Paul Ryan into a younger version of the devil theyve tried to paint Mitt Romney as. But they should worry about fighting a campaign on fundamental issues in a weak economy. Thats precisely how Jimmy Carter, the last Democratic president to run for reelection during hard times, wound up losing so badly that it not only cost Democrats control of the U.S. Senate but damaging the liberal brand for years afterwards.
**Hillary rubbing hands together and smirking**
Ah, yes, but for the reason that Billary & Hillary want Osama bin Obama to loose big time in November. And they want no part of her being on the ticket. Her only last chance is in 2016, but only if Obama looses now and she is not a part of the loss. Best, from their point of view, for Biden to stay on the ticket.
Just be certain they actually get the ballots and fill them out for themselves.
In a lot of these places, Obama-voting staff "helps" residents fill out their ballots..
According to the Obamedia she lost because she winked at her dad. Have they declared Biden the winner against Ryan yet?
Pray for America
...is now "mainstream" (MSM, etc.). George Orwell's nightmarish vision of the future is where we now find ourselves.
Unless of course you're in the government, complicit in the larceny, and getting a piece of the action...
Why do you think they could Bork Palin but won’t be able against Ryan?
No fear CD. We conservative daughters of different fathers and mothers are very hands on and heads up at this AL. Our varied parents our very much in their right minds and I’m making sure they vote.
Joe Biden cannot be beaten in a debate. His 1-2 punch of prepared lies and lies he makes up on the spot cannot be countered.
Biden will go into that battle of wits un-armed.
Very good point! The MSM knows all they need to know about him already. He wants to cut spending, so he's BAD, according to them.
Amen, brotha!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.