That’s rich. The establishment wants us to shut up and follow their lead, while they kiss rat ass.
Angle wasn’t radical, she just came across that way. She was a fine conservative, just a really bad candidate.
And she ALMOST WON.
There is a good chance Chris Matthews will have a tinkle down his leg if Romney wins.
Romney's not ANY kind of conservative.
I'd much rather gain the Senate by a large margin and see some gains in the House and lose the White House than to see this evil impostor elected.
It’s not “Mitt or lose”, it’s “Mitt AND lose”.
With Mitt, we lose either way. If he’s our best chance, then this country is doomed.
Another liberal in the WH that believes in government run HC, GW and federal mandates? He can’t win. Too many of us are simply not going along with swapping a socialist for a communist.
Nice bringing up Angle, but no mention of Rand Paul, Allen West, or Marco Rubio?
I’m not voting for Mitt. Not for any money. And I know I’m not alone.
If Mitt is it... I’m out
Last time Romney spent a lot of money in Iowa and lost badly to Huckabee.
I don't see how anything has changed for Romney.
Then when you consider Palin coming in, Romney prospects look much worse when there is a woman knocking the crap out of him.
LoL!
Sharon lost because Reid cheated
And to this very day, there are fools here trying to tell us that Sarah isn't running...
Think Republicans have a better chance of self-destructing if Mitt IS the nominee than if he isn’t.
Two really moderate, RINO craptastic presidential nominees in a row is not something we ought to be looking forward to.
If it’s Mitt we do lose....
Pure 100% horse crap.
[ Joe Miller, the Tea Party candidate who took on Lisa Murkowski in Alaska and lost last November, ]
Murcowski robbed Miller by democrats writing her name in..
the democrats candidate couldn’t win so they(many of them)
wrote in Merkowski.. an evil trick..
Lisa Merkowski.. is an evil person.. votes with democrats..
Mitt is self destruction for the Republican Party and the country. He will most likely mean another four years for Obama.
I’m pretty sure the Author of this piece of whatever actually meant to say “It’s Mitt and we Lose!”.
I’m so glad someone is standing up to the slick Willard. The guy has an atrocious record fiscally and socially. His state was 47th in job creation from the bottom. He did cut spending in MA initially but before he left he jacked it up again and left the state with an ever growing subsized health care mandate. The subisized portion grew from 130 million to 800 million in the first three years and by the end of this fiscal year it is estimated to be 880 million. He also forked out hundreds of thousands of dollars for the Governor’s commission on Gay and Lesbian youth while he attempted to raise fees on businesses so high that it took the liberal Democrats in MA intervening to stop him. I thought he was bad on social issues but his record is just aweful on fiscal issues but that is normal. I’ve never found the fiscal conservative social liberal beast some people claim to be. Usually if one is liberal on social issues it always bleeds over into fiscal issues or into Orwellian speech codes to shut up conservatives and such.
Mitt will lose all right. He’ll throw the ball game just like he did against Kennedy in 1994.
But I love the dummies on various sites insisting we do the Dole and McCain dance again. Romney isn’t that different from Obama. But the Democrats could blame us for anything wrong that happened on his watch, get their way on policy since he’s a big lib, and win back their congressional majorities. Win, win, win for them.
Go away Mitt, somewhere like Zimbabwe.