Bad governor Romney (now officially version 5.0) is NOT even in the picture.
Posted on 01/28/2011 10:06:30 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Most them aren’t definite no’s, but even if they’re holding out for the time being merely to see who else jumps in, that’s … not encouraging. Some, like Judd Gregg, may end up endorsing him anyway but might want to see if Daniels (or Huntsman?) declares first. Others, like DeMint, who have embraced the tea party full-fold almost certainly aren’t going to endorse him unless the entire “true conservative” bench decides not to run. Either way … not encouraging.
My favorite part? Hot on the heels of a rumor that Mitt might skip Iowa, there’s now a rumor circulating that he’ll skip South Carolina too. That makes superficial sense since both are social-conservative strongholds, but have we learned nothing from the Giuliani catastrophe, my friends?
As much as anything else, it calls into question just how far ahead of the pack he is as the 2012 contenders emerge. Even as Romney tries to project inevitability by signing up top GOP money men in Washington and New York, the defections suggest he’s seen as far from a sure thing even among insiders. After all, if top Republicans were willing to commit to Romney four years ago when he was a lesser known commodity, why won’t they get on board now when he’s a household name in the political circles and clearly among the most formidable candidates for his party’s nomination?…
Romney’s top strategists in [South Carolina] – who also are DeMint advisers – indicated that they hadn’t heard from their 2008 candidate and were unlikely to get behind him this time…
Peter Brown, a top GOP donor in Columbia who also served on Romney’s state finance committee in 2008, explained why he was not committed again.
“The word on the street is that Romney will skip South Carolina,” Brown said. “Most conservatives believe we need a Jim DeMint-type, assuming Jim will not run for president, someone who really wants to push for a limited federal government – not a government that will grow more slowly.”
Another possibility: His former South Carolina team might be convinced that Romney not only can’t win the state, he can’t win in the south more broadly. Whether that’s because he’s suspect on abortion or because he’s from Massachusetts or because of his faith, I don’t know, but PPP’s polling of some southern states suggests he’s having difficulties throughout the region. And by “difficulties,” I don’t mean he’s in second behind Huckabee. I mean he’s in fourth, way, way out of the lead, with a favorable rating among Republicans between 50 and 60 percent. If this is all about RomneyCare, I’m not sure why the objections would be so much sharper regionally. Any theories, southern readers?
Mitt, like his dad, got brainwashed.
Our Republic is at stake
Yes it is and to me only one person can save it and I'm sure you know who she is. :)
They need to all get behind Sarah Palin and encourage her to run!
Good point, an old man kicked Romney's @ss pretty badly.
Plus the mantle of ROMNEYCARE and the destruction of MA's economy and healthcare system is going to be difficult to explain away.
Depriving a man of his freedom in compelling him to enroll in insurance, needed or not is tyranny.
Not something people are likely run and embrace if they are remotely acquainted with the concept of freedom.
Seems Mitt peaked in 2008 and has no other place to go but down now. That’s got to be good for conservative Americans but bad for the RINO herd.
Shameful.
I may not have many presidential votes left- I hope to have many but we have to make every one count.
Thanks and God Bless.
I would hold my nose and vote for Romney if he is the candidate, rather than abstain under that scenario.
It won’t come to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.